Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Monsters Cafe and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1014/2025 M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.versusMONSTERS CAFE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.03.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the parties to the lis entered into a Master LoanAgreement dated 30.11.2017 pursuant to which the petitioner advanced a loan amount of Rs.14,64,600/- to the respondents at an interest rate of 19% per annum, repayable in thirty-six equated monthly instalments. The respondents committed default in repayment from 10.02.2021 and failed to adhere to the terms and conditions of the agreement. The petitioner issued a loan recall/termination notice dated 06.12.2023 and thereafter invoked the arbitration clause 10.1 by issuing notice dated 1...
Haroon@ Harun Khan and Others vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5601/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24030/2025 HAROON@ HARUN KHAN AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with SI Rahul, PS Burari. Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 454/2015 dated 14.04.2015, registered at Police Station Burari, District North, New Delhi, under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [the DP Act], and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the...
Eagle Hunter Soulutions Limited Through Its Authorized Representative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 12244/2019 & CM APPLs. 3309/2020, 9714/2021 EAGLE HUNTER SOULUTIONS LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Prakash Sharma, AdvocateversusASHOK KUMAR TIWARI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Guriqbal Singh Pantalia, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT (ORAL)1. The present writ petition, filed by the Management, is directed againstthe award dated 11.10.2018 passed by the learned Labour Court in a claim application filed by the Workman. Vide the aforesaid award, the Workman was held to be entitled to the relief of reinstatement with full backwages, along with continuity of services and all other consequential benefits.2. Briefly, the Workman had preferred a claim application, therebyclaiming that he was employed by the Management as a Security Supervisor since 02.07.2001 and his last drawn salary was Rs.6,576/- per month. It was further...
Madho Singh Chauhan vs Smriti & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 25/2024, CM APPL. 591/2024, CM APPL. 19898/2025, CM APPL. 19899/2025 & CM APPL. 58148/2025 MADHO SINGH CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSMRITI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. K. Sunil and Ms. Jahanvi Kapoor, Advocates for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 27, 2026/MR/TP At 2:35 P.M.3. At this stage, it is already 2:35 P.M., no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 27, 2026/MR/TPThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The O...
Deepak Khurana vs National Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 06.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 28.03.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 3211/2025 DEEPAK KHURANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Sr Adv. with Mr. Harish Chand, Mr. Anant Chittoria, Mr. Deepak Ahlawat and Mr. P.C. Arya, Advs.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Singh, SPP and Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present application, the applicant is seekinggrant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. RC- Agency, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Section 21(c)/23(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter NDPS Act). BAIL APPLN. 3211/2025 Page 1 of 82. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that aconsignment of liquorice roots (Mulethi), which had been imported from Afghanistan, had been ...
Puneet Budhiraja vs Santosh Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12618/2019 and CM APPL. 51584/2019 PUNEET BUDHIRAJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Mrgank Kashyap, AdvocateversusSANTOSH SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ankit Dwivedi, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.03.20261. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have reachedto an amicable settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 17.03.2026 before Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi. In terms of the settlement, the parties have agreed that a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- be paid to the respondent/workman.2. Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner haddeposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- which is lying deposited with the Registry of this Court. He submits that out of the said amount, Rs.1,25,000/- be released to the respondent/workman and the remaining amount alongwith the interest accrued upon the entire amount be releas...
Ajay Sarup (Through Power of Attorney Holder) vs Anjali Bhargava & Anr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 606/2025 & I.A. 21799/2025 AJAY SARUP (THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER) .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rohan Ganpathy, Advocate (M:8826787980)versusANJALI BHARGAVA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Kartik Nagarkatti, Advocates (M:9873368749)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.03.20261. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present matter, with liberty to file fresh suit, on account of certain other developments, which need to be incorporated.2. Accordingly, the present suit is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.3. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J MARCH 27, 2026/auThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 15:46:50...
Talib & Ors. vs State Through Sho Cyber Cell North & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4956/2025 TALIB & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Monis Rais, Advocate with Petitioners in person.versusSTATE THROUGH SHO CYBER CELL NORTH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP. Respondent No. 2 in Person (VC).CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 45/2024 dated 25.11.2024, registered at Cyber Police Station, District North, New Delhi, under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. The impugned FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2, alleging that on 14.11.2024, he increased the limit of his credit card to Rs.35,000/-, pursuant to which he received intimation of five ...
Shobhojeet Dey & Ors. vs Dr B R Ambedkar University Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11252/2025& CM APPL. 46245/2025, CM APPL. 46246/2025, CM APPL. 50052/2025, CM APPL. 54780/2025 SHOBHOJEET DEY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni, Ms. Pranjal Abrol, Mr Gurpal Singh, Mr. Ayan Dasgupta, Advs.versusDR B R AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder JS RupalMr. Hardik Rupal Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra Ms. Tripta Sharma Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. Ms. Abrol, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that in view of the order dated 16.03.2026 passed in W.P.(C) No. 17897/2025, the present petition has become infructuous.2. In view of this statement, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to avail any/all legal rights in case of any subsequent cause of action. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 27, 2026 / (MS)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the ...
Arun Jain & Ors. vs Harsh Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 62/2024, CM APPL. 18073/2024, CM APPL. 18075- 18076/2024 ARUN JAIN & ORS. .....Appellants Through: NoneversusHARSH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.03.20261. None has appeared in the present Appeal since 18.08.2025. Today also, none is present.2. The Appeal along with the pending Applications, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 27, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2026 at 15:22:11...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »