Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Bhavani D.ED. College vs National Council for Teacher Education & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3984/2026 SRI BHAVANI D.ED. COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Adv.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers :- (a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and Quash the WithdrawalOrder dt. 19.05.2025, withdrawing recognition ofpetitioner institution for running the D.EL.ED course from academic year 2025-2026; and;(b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No.2to issue restoration of recognition of petitioner institution for D.EL.ED course from Academic Year 2025-2026; and;(c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus enabling the petitioner toparticipate in counselling and admit students for D.EL.ED course for Academic Year 2025-2026.And/or2. For the reaso...
Shanti & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 987/2026 SHANTI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. The petitioners are the complainants at whose instance FIR No.Puri, District North West, Delhi, under Sections 85, 80, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR concerns the suicide of their daughter, allegedly in the wake of demand for dowry and harassment by her husband and his family.2. It is the petitioners grievance that the investigation is not beingconducted satisfactorily. For this purpose, they seek the constitution of a Special Investigation Team, a court-monitored investigation, and the seizure and forensic examination of the mobile phones of the accused.3. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, learned Additional Standing Counsel f...
Swati Saista vs the Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 159/2026, CM APPL. 19134/2026 & CM APPL. 19135/2026SWATI SAISTA .....Appellant Through: Appellant-in-Person (through VC).versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate (Panel Counsel) for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Kumar & Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.2 (through VC). Ms. Pratima N. Lakra- CGSC along with Ms. Upanita Soumyadarshini & Mr. Shailendra Mishra, Advocates for Respondent No.3 / Ministry of Law & Justice and Ministry of Women & Child Development. Mr. Venkat Mani Tripathi - Government Pleader for Respondent No.3/Union of India.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19136/2026 (Condonation of Delay)1. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 4 days in filingthe Appeal is hereby condoned.2. The Application stands disposed of.LPA 159/20263. Heard th...
Jag Mohan Kapoor vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3919/2026 JAG MOHAN KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal, ASC for MCD with Ms. Deepa Rathore, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Gupta and Mr Anubhav Gupta, Advs. for R-3. Mr Neeraj, SPC with Mr Yash Tyagi(GP) and Mr Vivek Tomar, Adv. forR-4&5.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 27.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Jag MohanKapoor under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site i.e., Open Space, Local Shopping Complex, D Block, East of Kailash, South Zone, Ward S-86, New Delhi.3. The case of th...
Niraj Kumar & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3910/2026 CM APPL. 19148/2026 NIRAJ KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Sourabh Soni Mr. Atal Singh and Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shakun Sudha, Advocate with Mr Garvil Singh (GP) and Ms Deepshikha Kaur Anand, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 27.03.2026 CM APPL. 19148/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 3910/20263. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-a. A direction to the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi to decide the correctness/antecedents of the documents produced by Petitioners No. 1 to 15, showing proof in support of the fact that no case/FIR is pending against them, within Two weeks, a...
Ramesh Chandra Singh vs Bar Council of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27.03.2026+ LPA 161/2026 & CM APPL. 19155/2026 RAMESH CHANDRA SINGH .....Appellant Through: Appellant-in-person.versusBAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Preetpal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur, Ms. Medha Sharma, Ms. Simran Kumar, Ms. Pooja and Mr. Gaurav, Advocates for BCI.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIATEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral)1. The present intra court Appeal has been filed being aggrieved by theOrder dated 19.03.2026 (Impugned Order) in W.P.(C) 3525/2026(Writ Petition), whereby the Writ Petition, seeking a direction to Respondent No. 1 / Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) to clarify that 6 seats are reserved for advocates with less than 10 years of practice, was dismissed.2. The Appellant-in-person submitted that the Appellant is a practicingadvocate and a candidate for the member in the BCD Election 2026. The Appellant challenged the notification dated 24.12.2025...
Rahul J. Sheth vs Durgesh Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 87/2026, CRL.M.A. 9260/2026, 9259/2026 &CRL.M.(BAIL) 626/2026RAHUL J. SHETH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given)versusDURGESH SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Petitioner assails order dated 18.02.2026 of the appellate courtwhereby on account of default in compliance with the directions under Section 148 Negotiable Instruments Act, suspension of sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was revoked.2. Learned counsel for petitioner has taken me through records and it iscontended that suspension of sentence was not subject to deposit 20% of the compensation amount, therefore, the suspension of sentence once granted could not have been revoked. In this regard, learned counsel has taken me through record.3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that after conviction,the ...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2280/2026M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9312/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9313/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2280/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9311/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16383/2019 filed under sections 138/141 o...
Prof. (Rtd.) Desh Bandhu vs School of Planning and Architecture, New D ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.03.2026+ LPA 157/2026 PROF. (RTD.) DESH BANDHU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.versusSCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, NEW DELHIAND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIATEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 19097/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of.LPA 157/20263. This Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 27.02.2026(Impugned Order) passed in W.P.(C) No. 2844/2026 (Writ Petition), whereby the Writ Petition was dismissed on the ground that the Appellant was trying to re-open the very same issue, which was abandoned earlier inW.P.(C) No. 10752/2025 (Earlier Writ Petition) disposed of vide orderdated 08.08.2025.Signed By:NEELAM LPA 157/2026 Page 1 of 54. The Appellant has challenged...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2283/2026M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9321/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9322/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2283/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9320/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16398/2019 filed under sections 138/141 o...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »