Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 43 of about 750 results (0.020 seconds)University of Delhi vs.ram Kishan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-31A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 02.2019 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shiv Ram Singh, Adv. + W.P.(C) 2591/2003 versus RAM KISHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal with Ms.Meghna De, Mr.Sachin Kumar & Ms.Neelam Tiwari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articleof the Constitution of India, the petitioner/Delhi University impugns award dated 02.09.2002 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-II, Delhi in ID No.44/2000 whereunder the learned Labour Court after coming to the conclusion that the services of the respondent/workman had been illegally terminated w.e.f. 01.02.1998, directed that he would be deemed to be in service from 01.02.1998. The learned Labour Court consequently directed that all consequential reliefs and wages would be payable to the respondent/workman. Page 1 of 6 W.P.(C) 2591/2003 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner whi...
Tag this Judgment!Lupin Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 38874/2018 9978/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2019 and CM APPL. 38873/2018 & M/S MICRO LABS LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10757/2018 and CM APPL. 41978/2018 & 41979/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10936/2018 and CM APPL. 42605/2018 & 44745/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS AND W.P.(C) 9978/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 24 + W.P.(C) 11278/2018 and CM APPL. 43787/2018 & 43788/2018 ERIS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Sahadeva Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Ms Archana 9978/2018. Ms Bitika Sharma, Ms Namrita Kochhar and Ms Vrinda Pathak in W.P.(C) 10757/2018. Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocat...
Tag this Judgment!Kavita Jain vs.munna Lal Sharma
Court: Delhi
$~30 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:13. 02.2019 Tr. P. (C) No.125/2018 KAVITA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate with Mr.Sagar Chaturvedi, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL MUNNA LAL SHARMA Through: None. ..... Respondent CM No.6161/2019 (for early hearing) 1. Despite the advance copy of the application having been served, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent.2. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the next date of hearing before the trial court is 18.02.2019. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. TR.P.(C.) 125/2018 3. Notice of the Transfer Petition for 14.08.2018 has been served on the respondent, who did not put in his appearance. Therefore, next date in this petition i.e. 14.03.2019 is cancelled. I proceed to dispose of this petition. Tr.P. (C) No.125/2018 Page 1 of 2 4. The petitioner seeks transfer of her Civil Suit No.2077/2016 filed by her from the court of Ms.Shuchi...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Kumar Singh & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 820/2019 MANISH KUMAR SINGH & ORS Through: Mr. Anjum Kumar, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr.N.K. Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 3291/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 820/2019 Quashing of FIR No.454/2015, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Mansarovar Park, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 11th January, 2016 reached between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she CRL.M.C. 820/2019 Page 1 of 4 has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on ...
Tag this Judgment!Narinder Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5750/2018 and CRL.M.A. 47324/2018 NARINDER KUMAR Through: Nemo. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Arun Vohra, Mr. Dilip Kumar and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is accused No.2 in complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and upon his appearance before the trial court, he had pleaded guilty, and it is so recorded in the order of 9th February, 2018. However, lateron while taking plea of mental illness, petitioner had filed an application seeking withdrawal of his plea of guilt and the said application has been rejected by trial court vide impugned order of 5th May, 2018. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and the material on record, I find that the trial court has observed that the pl...
Tag this Judgment!Purshotam Keshwani & Ors. Vs.nishant Mitrasen Mahimtura & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h February, 2019 CS(COMM) 825/2018 PURSHOTAM KESHWANI & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kartik Nayar, Mr. Nikhil Y. Chawla & Mr. Rishab Kumar, Advs. Versus NISHANT MITRASEN MAHIMTURA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pradeep Vade and Mr. Venkata Krishna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.5693/2018(u/O.XXXIX R. 1 & 2 CPC).1. The application of the plaintiffs for interim relief is for consideration.2. The four plaintiffs namely, (i) Mr. Purshotam Keshwani; (ii) Mr. Sidhant Keshwani; (iii) LIBAS Impex; and, (iv) LIBAS Fashions Pvt. Ltd. have instituted this suit, against the four defendants, namely, (a) Nishant Mitrasen Mahimtura; (b) Ms. Reshma Riyaz Gangji; (c) Riyaz Eqbal Gangji; and, (d) LIBAS DESIGN LTD., for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off and for ancillary reliefs. The mark of the plaintiffs as under:-"3. CS(COMM) 8...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Mukesh Kapil vs.ranjeet Towers (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13.02.2019 + FAO (OS) 108/2014 & CM APPL. 3543/2014, 33060/2017, 34708/2017 & 18578/2018 SHRI MUKESH KAPIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindroo & Ms. Sapna S. Kapil, Advocates RANJEET TOWERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. versus Through: Mr. Virag Gupta, Mr. Gaurav Pathak & Ms. Vanya Gupta, Advocates for R- 2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 22.10.2013 and order dated 06.02.2014 whereby the learned Single Judge had dismissed an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the appellant herein (plaintiff in the suit) against respondent No.2 in a Civil Suit bearing CS (OS) 2296/2012. The relevant facts are that property bearing No.14 Bazar Lane, Babar Road, Bengali Market, New Delhi (Suit Property), was owned by the father of the appellant herein, namely, late Shri Darsha...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:04. h February, 2019 Judgment delivered on:13. h February, 2019 + CRL.A. 1091/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1695/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50253/2018 (Probation) RAJ KUMAR STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Amit Kumar and Mr.Subhash Baghel, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.A. 1091/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1695/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50253/2018 (Probation) 1. Appellant impugns order on conviction dated 06.07.2018 convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under section 3IPC and order on sentence dated 09.07.2018 directing the Appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs 5000/- and in default thereof to undergo simple imprisonment of three months. CRL.A. 1091/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. Case of the prosecution is that on 05.09.2012 at around 9:00 ...
Tag this Judgment!Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors. Vs.smt. Raj Kumari and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~26. * + % W.P.(C) 1444/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13.02.2019 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, St. Counsel, GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advs. versus SMT. RAJ KUMARI AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.6621/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1444/2019 & C.M. No.6620/2019 1. The GNCTD has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 28.08.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.1884/2017. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, has allowed the said Original Application preferred by W.P.(C.) No.1444/2019 Page 1 of 6 the respondent the widow and daughter of the deceased Government servant, late Raj Kumar Singh wherein they had sought gra...
Tag this Judgment!Nitin Shakya & Ors. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 289/2019 NITIN SHAKYA & ORS. Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person ........ Petitioners Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Ajeet Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.221/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Sagarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 4th January, 2017 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties.... Petitioner No.1 is present in person and has chosen to argue himself. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ajeet Singh on the basis of identity proof Crl.M.C.289/2019 Page 1 of 5 produced by...
Tag this Judgment!