Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 47 of about 750 results (0.019 seconds)Ram Dass vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~04. * + % W.P.(C) 13483/2018 RAM DASS Date of Decision:13.02.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Singh, Adv. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal with Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for DDA. Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 04.09.2018 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.2325/2013. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application wherein the petitioner assailed the disciplinary action taken against him by the respondent.2. The petitioner was issued a charge memorandum dated 13.03.2008 alleging gross negligence in processing a file pertaining to allotment of land W.P.(C.) No.13483/2018 Page 1 of 4 in favour of Housing Society. Departmental Inquiry was held. T...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Shahnawaz & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 797/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3233/2019 MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Shahid Ahmed, Advocates Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional ....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Harindra Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.758/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Sultanpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 13th April, 2018 (Annexure P-2).2. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.797/2019 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Abhishek Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 440/2017 ABHISHEK KUMAR Versus Through: In person .....Petitioner .....Respondents STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 11th September, 2015 puts petitioner on trial for the offences under Sections 498A/406 IPC in FIR No.361/2012, registered at police station Pandav Nagar, Delhi. Against trial courts order of framing Charges against petitioner, a revision petition was preferred. The Revisional Court vide impugned order of 26th December, 2016 has dismissed it by observing that at this stage prima facie case has to be seen and appreciation of evidence is not required to be undertaken and has relied upon decisions of Supreme Court to hold so.... Petitioner, who appears in person, chooses to argue himself and submits that th...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Rockland Hospital Ltd. Vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3870/2014 & CM No.7811/2014 M/S. ROCKLAND HOSPITAL LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Mushtaq Sanam and Mr Choudhary, Singh Prateek Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Naushad Ahmed Khan, and Ms for ASC, Mr Zahid Manisha, GNCTD. Mr Vaibhav Agnihotri proxy for Mr Ajay Verma, Sr. Standing counsel for DDA. Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1302.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that 1. directions be issued to respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner pursuant to the judgment dated 22.03.2007 passed in W.P. (C) 2866/2002 (Social Jurists, a Lawyers Group v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. :140. (2007) DLT698(DB). The petitioner also impugns a show cause notice dated 08.08.2013 issued by respondent no.1 calling upon the petitioner to explain as to why action should not be initiated against...
Tag this Judgment!Airports Authority of India vs.bgsctpl-vil Consortium
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 01.2019 Date of decision:13. 02.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 140/2016 BGSCTPL - VIL CONSORTIUM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.K.L. Varghese, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Santha Varghese, Mr.Sanand Ramakrishnan & Mr.Rajeev Mishra, Advs. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sonal Kumar Singh, Ms.Prity Sharma & Ms.Paromita Majumdar, Advs. + O.M.P. (COMM) 149/2016 & IA No.533/2016 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sonal Kumar Singh, Ms.Prity Sharma & Ms.Paromita Majumdar, Advs. versus BGSCTPL-VIL CONSORTIUM ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K.L. Varghese, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Santha Varghese, Mr.Sanand Ramakrishnan & Mr.Rajeev Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been O.M.P. (COMM) Nos.140/2016 & 149...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Shambhuji vs.sh. Saurabh Kulshrestha
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 165/2019 & CRL.M.A. 3055-3056/2019 DR. SHAMBHUJI Through: In person Versus SH. SAURABH KULSHRESTHA Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR .....Petitioner .....Respondent ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 3rd November, 2018 dismisses petitioners complaint for defamation by observing that the alleged defamatory statement is part of necessary pleadings in a civil suit and so, alleged defamatory statement is squarely covered under Exception 8 of Section 499 IPC.2.... Petitioner, who appears in person, chooses to argue himself. He submits that in reply to application under Section 340 Cr.P.C., respondent at three places stated that petitioner has forcibly dispossessed his mother. It is pointed out that respondent in the Reply (Annexure P-8) has stated that petitioner has beaten his mother and had threatened her to throw her out of her own house. It is pointed out that petitioners mother had...
Tag this Judgment!Manisha vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 362/2018 MANISHA STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Mr. Tarun Goomber, Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.407/2015 was registered on 25.04.2015 by Police Station Safdurjung Enclave on the complaint of the petitioner, allegations having been made and the investigation taken up for offences allegedly committed under Sections 354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The police, having concluded the investigation, submitted report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking trial of one Dr. Naval Bhatia on the accusations for offences punishable under Sections 354/354-A/506/509 IPC. Allegations had also been made by the petitioner agains...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Gupta vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Swati Jain vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2190/2018 SWATI JAIN versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. F.K. Kha, Mr. Sarwesh and Mr. Saket, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.267/2017 initially registered under Section 3IPC. After investigation, chargesheet was filed under Sections 498-A/304-B/302/201/182/120-B/34 of the IPC at Police Station Rani Bagh.2. A charge has been framed against the petitioner under Sections 498-A/304-B/2of the IPC.... Petitioner has been in custody since 13.12.2017.... Petitioner is sister-in-law of the deceased i.e. wife of the brother 3.4. BAIL APPLN. 2190/2018 Page 1 of 3 of the husband of the deceased (Devrani).5. The allegations in the FIR are that the dece...
Tag this Judgment!Youngsters Fc vs.football Delhi (Dsa)
Court: Delhi
$~30 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:12. 02.2019 F.A.O.No.541/2018 & C.M. No.49484/2018 YOUNGSTERS FC ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Mukhija & Chitanshu, Advocates. Versus FOOTBALL DELHI (DSA) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Through: Mr. Piyush Joshi, Advocate. ....Respondent 1. Mr. Piyush Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent is in the process of constituting a fresh arbitral tribunal in order to hear the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 14.07.2018 which was communicated to him on 03.08.2018. On 30.11.2018 after hearing both the parties, this court has passed the following order :-"1. Mr. Piyush Joshi, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent.2. The appellant is a club of persons/individuals playing football, which has participated in football competitions at different levels. The appellant club is registered with the respondent (DSA) which is an association of numerous foo...
Tag this Judgment!