Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 46 of about 750 results (0.013 seconds)Narinder Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5747/2018 and CRL.M.A. 47318/2018 NARINDER KUMAR Through: Nemo. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Arun Vohra, Mr. Dilip Kumar and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is accused No.2 in complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and upon his appearance before the trial court, he had pleaded guilty, and it is so recorded in the order of 9th February, 2018. However, lateron while taking plea of mental illness, petitioner had filed an application seeking withdrawal of his plea of guilt and the said application has been rejected by trial court vide impugned order of 5th May, 2018. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and the material on record, I find that the trial court has observed that the pl...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender Rajpal & Anr vs.ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~26, 27, 28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:13. h February, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 28/2019 JITENDER RAJPAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate versus ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Chetan Dutt, Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Ms. Anubha Singh, Advocates FAO(OS) (COMM) 29/2019 VARUN TANDON ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate versus ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Chetan Dutt, Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Ms. Anubha Singh, Advocates ..... Respondent FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2019 AMRAJIT SINGH KAPOOR & ANR Through Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellants versus ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Chetan Dutt, Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav and Ms. Anubha Singh, Advocates ..... Respondent * % + + + FAO(OS) (COMM) 28/2019 etc. Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Jitender Singh Tomar vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 803/2019 and Crl.M.A.3253-3254/2019 SH. JITENDER SINGH TOMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate STATE versus Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Naresh, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is one of the several accused persons who stand summoned in the criminal case (CC No.12482/2018) registered on the basis of report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.605/2015 to Police Station Hauz Khas. The FIR was registered on the compliant of Honorary Secretary, Bar Council of Delhi alleging offences punishable under sections 420/467/468/471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed, certain individuals, statedly...
Tag this Judgment!Donv and Limited vs.mykind Vacations Private Limited
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~CP-15 * % + CO.PET. 218/2014 DONV AND LIMITED Date of Decision:13. 02.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Mr. Peeush Sharma, Mr. Bharvi Thakur & Ms. Kritika Nagpal, Advocates versus MYKIND VACATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shyam Moorjhani, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Mr. Tanya Joshi & Mr. Ankit Jalal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) This petition is filed under Section 433(e) read with Section 434 and 1. 439 of the Companies Act, 1956(hereinafter referred to as the Company Act) for winding up of the respondent company.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner started business with the respondent in 2010 vide Sale Agreement dated 1.1.2010. It is stated that an account was provided to the respondent to make the bookings for final customers. The said agreement was to continue until 31st March, 2011. The parties entered into a FIT Sales Agreement on 25.11.2011. It is...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Micro Labs Limited vs.drugs Controller General of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 38874/2018 9978/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2019 and CM APPL. 38873/2018 & M/S MICRO LABS LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10757/2018 and CM APPL. 41978/2018 & 41979/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10936/2018 and CM APPL. 42605/2018 & 44745/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS AND W.P.(C) 9978/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 24 + W.P.(C) 11278/2018 and CM APPL. 43787/2018 & 43788/2018 ERIS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Sahadeva Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Ms Archana 9978/2018. Ms Bitika Sharma, Ms Namrita Kochhar and Ms Vrinda Pathak in W.P.(C) 10757/2018. Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocat...
Tag this Judgment!Stellar Constellation Projects P. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.deepak Garg
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h February, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 462/2019 STELLAR CONSTELLATION PROJECTS P. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Manisha Bhandari, Mr.Omkar Shrivastava, Mr.Anil Mathur and Mr.Divyadeep Chaturvedi, Advocates ..... Respondent versus DEEPAK GARG CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Represented by: None Crl.M.A.No.3267/2019 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(Crl.) No.462/2019 & Crl.M.A.No.3266/2019 1. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 4th September, 2018 summoning the petitioners as accused on a complaint being CC No.1858/2017 filed by the respondent No.2 before the Court under Section 200 Cr.P.C. The first ground urged by learned counsel for the petitioners is that the learned Metropolitan Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction over PS Malviya Nagar had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain W.P.(CRL) 462/2019 Page 1 of 8 the complaint as the complainant is a...
Tag this Judgment!Gaurav Verma vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 792/2019 & CRL.M.A.3219/2019 GAURAV VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Mishra, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public respondent-State for Prosecutor with SI Naresh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.3220/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 792/2019 & CRL.M.A.3219/2019 Quashing of FIR No.50/2011, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at police station Mansarover Park, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th November, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Naresh Kumar, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No.2 present in the Cour...
Tag this Judgment!Narinder Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5742/2018 and CRL.M.A. 47308/2018 NARINDER KUMAR Through: Nemo. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Arun Vohra, Mr. Dilip Kumar and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is accused No.2 in complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and upon his appearance before the trial court, he had pleaded guilty, and it is so recorded in the order of 9th February, 2018. However, lateron while taking plea of mental illness, petitioner had filed an application seeking withdrawal of his plea of guilt and the said application has been rejected by trial court vide impugned order of 5th May, 2018. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and the material on record, I find that the trial court has observed that the pl...
Tag this Judgment!Simla- Chandigarh Educaional Society and Anr. Vs.central Board of Seco ...
Court: Delhi
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2681/2018 & CM APPL. 10968/2018 Date of Decision:13. h February, 2019 % 1. SIMLA- CHANDIGARH EDUCAIONAL SOCIETY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tarique Siddiqui, Ms. Reetika Gupta and Mr. Aamir Zaidi, Advs. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Through: Mr. Amit Bansal with Mr. ..... Respondent Seema Dolo, Advs. for CBSE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition was directed against an order dated 17th October/13th November, 2017, whereby the provisional affiliation granted to the petitioner-School was withdrawn.2. Mr. Bansal, learned counsel for the CBSE, submits that the said allegation stands restored vide order dated 11th February, 2019.3. As such, in view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, draws my attention to prayer B in the writ petition, and asserts that one of the allegations, W.P.(C) 2...
Tag this Judgment!State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.kuldeep @ Sonu
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 20th December, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 13th February, 2019 + CRL. L.P. 620/2018 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .......... Petitioner Through: Ms.RadhikaKulluri, APP for the State. Versus KULDEEP @ SONU .....Respondent Through: Mr. T. A. Siddique, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The present leave petition has been filed by the State under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated15.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge- 01, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.9210/2016 arising out of case FIR No.585/2015 under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and under Sections of Protection of Children from Sexual OffencesAct, 2012(hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act) whereas, the charge...
Tag this Judgment!