Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Suman Jain vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 1171/2017 & CM No.5324/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 1212/2017 & CM No.5502/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 3938/2017 & CM No.17354/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus MOHD. AKHTAR. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS AND + W.P.(C) 4946/2017 & CM No.21381/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: W.P.(C) 1171/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 27 For the... Petitioner: Mr S. D. Singh, Mr Puneet Kumar Jain, Mr Rahul Kumar Singh and Ms Kamla Kumar and Mr Kartik Arora. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kishan Rawat and MrRajanNarain, Prabhakar, Advocate Advocates for R-1. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-3/UOI. Mr Jawahar Raja, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Kritika Padode, Advocate for R-5 a...
Tag this Judgment!Narinder Paul Kaushik vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Suman Jain vs.chelmsford Club Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 1171/2017 & CM No.5324/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 1212/2017 & CM No.5502/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 3938/2017 & CM No.17354/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus MOHD. AKHTAR. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS AND + W.P.(C) 4946/2017 & CM No.21381/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: W.P.(C) 1171/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 27 For the... Petitioner: Mr S. D. Singh, Mr Puneet Kumar Jain, Mr Rahul Kumar Singh and Ms Kamla Kumar and Mr Kartik Arora. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kishan Rawat and MrRajanNarain, Prabhakar, Advocate Advocates for R-1. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-3/UOI. Mr Jawahar Raja, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Kritika Padode, Advocate for R-5 a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Cinevistaas Ltd. Vs.m/s Prasar Bharti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. h December, 2018 Date of decision :12. h February, 2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 31/2017 & I.A. 13479/2018 M/S CINEVISTAAS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.K. Bansal, Advocate (M- 9810925670) versus M/S PRASAR BHARTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Mr. Saket Chandra & Mr. T. Rajat Krishna, Advocates (M-8130881262) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT I.A. 13479/2018 (for restoration) 1. This is an application seeking restoration of OMP(COMM) 31/2017 which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 7th September, 2018. For the reasons stated in the application, OMP(COMM) 31/2017. Accordingly, I.A. is allowed. O.M.P. (COMM) 31/2017 2. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, Act) has been filed challenging order dated 8th August, 2009 passed by the Ld. Arbitrator. The said order rejects the prayer for...
Tag this Judgment!International Traceability Systems Ltd vs.afc India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 2.2019 + ARB.P. 770/2018 INTERNATIONAL TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunav Patnaik with Mr. Shikhar Saha, Advs. versus AFC INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kaustubh Anshuraj with Mr. Devesh Partap Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act). The petitioner prays that a sole Arbitrator be appointed in the matter to adjudicate upon the disputes obtaining between the parties herein.2. Notice in this petition was issued on 9.10.2018. Notice was made ARB.P. 770 of 2018 Pg. 1 of 7 returnable on 11.1.2019. On that date, Mr. Kaustubh Anshuraj, Advocate, entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. Mr. Anshuraj sought time to obtain instructions in the matter.3. Accordingly, it was clearly indicated in the order dated 11.1.2019...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Telecom Ltd vs.atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 12, 2019 + + EFA(OS) (COMM) 4/2019 RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD ..... Appellant versus ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent EFA(OS) (COMM) 5/2019 RELIANCE TELECOM LTD ..... Appellant versus ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Counsel for the Appellant: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saket Singh, Mr. Sayarce Basu Mallik, Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Advocates Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warier, Mr. Angad Kochhar, Mr. Varun Byreddy, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) ORDER1 These appeals question the orders made in the course of enforcement proceedings taken out by the respondent/decree holder ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. EFA (OS)(Comm) No.4 & 5/2019 Page 1 of 8 2. At the outset, this court notices that the appeal is not maintainable given the p...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Vikram Kumar Dabas vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Lokesh Kumar vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 % + CRL.REV.P. 831/2016 LOKESH KUMAR versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. S.C.Sagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the Respondent: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Deep Chand, P.S.Vasant Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 17.09.2016 whereby the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner impugning order on conviction dated 26.04.2016 and order on sentence dated 05.05.2016.... Petitioner has been convicted of an offence under Section 380 and Section 454 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo 2 years imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- in default 3 months SI for the offence under Section 380 IPC and RI for 3 three years and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default 3 months SI for the offence under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Mona vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 12, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2229/2018 MONA Through: Mr.Adit S. Pujari, Advocates ........ Petitioner STATE Versus Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR SI Sandeep, PS Crime Branch. ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.321 of 2013 under Sections 302/452/395/396/412/120B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Crime Branch, East Delhi. Status Report and the medical report have been obtained from the concerned Sr. Medical Officer of Tihar Jail.... Petitioners counsel presses for interim bail for a period of two months to enable to get herself treated from a private hospital. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that petitioner is the master mind who had got four persons murdered, while committing dacoity in the house of the complainant and that petitioner can be treated in the government hospital while in custody. Upon hearin...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Tourism & Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.( Dttdc ) v ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) No.69/2019 & I.A. Nos. 2148/2019, 2149/2019 & 2150/2019 Date of decision:12. h February, 2019 DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.( DTTDC ) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate. versus GRAVISS CATERING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): Facts 1. This petition is directed against an award dated 20 March 2018 passed by a sole Arbitrator. The background in which the instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act) has been filed is set out hereafter:2. However, before I proceed further, I would like to indicate that the petitioner i.e. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Limited would be hereafter referred to as DTTDC while the respondent i.e. Graviss Catering Private Limited would be referred to OMP (COMM) No.69/2...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »