Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 44 of about 750 results (0.036 seconds)Aditya Mittal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 795/2019 & CRL.M.As. 3227-28/2019 ADITYA MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Mr. Anurag Bansal and Ms. Susmita Mahala, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajeshwar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.261/2017, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at police station Dwarka Sector-23, Delhi is sought on merits. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that charge-sheet in this case has been filed and vide impugned order of 29th November, 2018 charge has been framed against petitioner for the offence under Sectionof IPC. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no application of mind in filing of the charge-sheet and framing of the charge as the complainant/first informant of this FIR has not stated anything against petitioner and first informant has rath...
Tag this Judgment!Bgsctpl - Vil Consortium vs.airports Authority of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 01.2019 Date of decision:13. 02.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 140/2016 BGSCTPL - VIL CONSORTIUM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.K.L. Varghese, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Santha Varghese, Mr.Sanand Ramakrishnan & Mr.Rajeev Mishra, Advs. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sonal Kumar Singh, Ms.Prity Sharma & Ms.Paromita Majumdar, Advs. + O.M.P. (COMM) 149/2016 & IA No.533/2016 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sonal Kumar Singh, Ms.Prity Sharma & Ms.Paromita Majumdar, Advs. versus BGSCTPL-VIL CONSORTIUM ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K.L. Varghese, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Santha Varghese, Mr.Sanand Ramakrishnan & Mr.Rajeev Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been O.M.P. (COMM) Nos.140/2016 & 149...
Tag this Judgment!University of Delhi vs.prof Devendra Mishra & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :13. 02.2019 LPA1942010 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Singh, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Mansha ..... Appellant PROF DEVENDRA MISHRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shankar Raju, Mr. K.R. Chawla, Mr. Nilansh Gaur and Mr. Santosh K. Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant-University of Delhi assails the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 5075/2007 on 16.02.2010. The said writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge and the communication dated 20.06.2007, informing the respondent that he was not favourably considered for re-employment till the age of 65 yearson attaining the age of superannuation, was set aside, and the appellant was directed to pay all emoluments to the petitioner that would have been admissible to him under the Rules, by treating him to be in service till 31.01.2010 i.e. till h...
Tag this Judgment!Eris Lifesciences Limited vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 38874/2018 9978/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2019 and CM APPL. 38873/2018 & M/S MICRO LABS LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10757/2018 and CM APPL. 41978/2018 & 41979/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10936/2018 and CM APPL. 42605/2018 & 44745/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS AND W.P.(C) 9978/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 24 + W.P.(C) 11278/2018 and CM APPL. 43787/2018 & 43788/2018 ERIS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Sahadeva Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Ms Archana 9978/2018. Ms Bitika Sharma, Ms Namrita Kochhar and Ms Vrinda Pathak in W.P.(C) 10757/2018. Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocat...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Surendra vs.syndicate Bank
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 439/2018 & CM APPLN. 1854/2018 Reserved on Pronounced on :24. 01.20 13.02.2019 SHRI SURENDRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ravi Bassi, Adv. with Mr.Sanyam Malik & Mr.Nitin Kumar, Advs. versus SYNDICATE BANK ..... Respondent Through Mr.Puneet Taneja, Adv. with Ms.Laxmi Kumari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside impugned order dated 18.10.2017 of the Appellate Authority, constituted under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, vide which Administrative order dated 05.03.2016 of respondent bank forfeiting the gratuity of the petitioner has been upheld. Further seeks direction thereby directing to restore order dated 12.06.2017 of the Controlling Authority vide which the controlling Authority, constituted under the Payment of Gratuity W.P.(C) 439/2018 Page 1 of 11 Act, 1972, directed the respondent to pay the applicant a sum of 10,00,0...
Tag this Judgment!Manoranjan Tv vs.neeraj Singh Rahtor & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: - 13.02.2019 + W.P.(C) 426/2017 & C.M.No.1989/2017 MANORANJAN TV ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber with Mr.Aditya Chhibber, Advs. versus NEERAJ SINGH RAHTOR & ANR. Through Mr.Rajat Sharma, Adv for R-1. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the ex-parte award dated 01.12.2014 passed by the learned Labour Court IX, Delhi in I.D.No.663/2011. The petitioner also seeks quashing of the consequential recovery notice dated 30.12.2016, whereby the petitioner was asked to deposit with the respondent no.2 a sum of Rs.4,97,000/- alongwith interest @ 8% p.a. towards backwages of the respondent no.1 as directed under the impugned award.2. Mr.Ankur Chhibber, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned award, has been passed without giving any opportunity to the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Bhoj Raj Singh vs.jamshed Ali & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:13. 02.2019 Tr. P. (C) No.55/2018 BHOJ RAJ SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Versus JAMSHED ALI & ORS Through: Mr. Yogesh Gaur & Mr. Deepak Gautam, Advocates. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL By this petition, the petitioner seeks transfer of Civil Suit 1. No.606/2007 (new Civil Suit No.8897/2016; titled as Bhoj Raj Singh vs. Jamshed Ali & Ors.) from the court of Ms. Harleen Singh, Senior Civil Judge, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, to any competent court of jurisdiction in North-East District, Delhi.2. Initially, the petition was filed on the ground that the other suit bearing No.158/2007 (new Civil Suit No.4652/2015) is pending adjudication between the parties before the court of Sh. Amitabh Rawat, Senior Civil Judge, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.3. Learned counsel for the parties, at this stage, pointed out that the Civil Suit No.158/2...
Tag this Judgment!Kirti Shah vs.c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2019 CRL.A. 157/2019 KIRTI SHAH C.B.I. Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Senior .....Appellant Advocate with Mr. Abhilash Mathur, Mr. Prashant Jain and Mr. Manyank Sharma, Advocates versus Through: Mr.Ashutosh Ghade and .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Mr. Nikhil Goel, Advocates ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.3279/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.(BAIL) 284/2019 For the offence under Section 120B IPC, appellant has been directed to undergo simple imprisonment for period of two months and fine of 50,000/- with default clause and for the offence under Section 420 IPC, he has been directed to undergo simple imprisonment of two months and fine of 2,20,00,000/- with default clause. Learned senior counsel for appellant seeks suspension of the sentence awarded to appellant by submitting that out of the total stock of CRL.A. 157/2019 Page 1 of 2 5,000 meteric tons of metal, appellant had li...
Tag this Judgment!Preeti Sharma & Ors. Vs.m/s. Megma Housing Finance & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2082018 & CM APPL. 19121/2018. PREETI SHARMA & ORS. ..Appellants Through: Mr.M.L Garg, Advocate. Versus M/S MEGMA HOUSING FINANCE & ANR. ..Respondents Through: Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT1302.2019 VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) FAO2082018 1. The appellants have filed this appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('ACA') against the Judgment dated 20.11.2018 passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge (Central), Pilot Court, Tis Hazari, Delhi (ADJ) dismissing their petition under section 34 against the arbitral award dated 07.10.2011.2. The facts leading up to the filing of the present Appeal are that the appellants had availed of a loan from the respondent No.1 in the year 2007 and as on 31.08.2011, a sum of Rs.25,57,166/- was outstanding against them. FAO2082018 Page 1 of 5 3. The respondent issued a legal notice to the appellants and then referred the dispute to the Arbitrator as per the ar...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar vs.larsen and Toubro Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~O-10 & O-11 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h February, 2019 + 10 CS(COMM) 538/2017 & O.A. 106/2018 & I.A. 11521/2018 SUNIL KUMAR Through: Mr.Vikas ..... Plaintiff Kumar, Mr.Aliya Durafshan and Mr.Manish Paliwal, Advocates Through: Mr.A.C. Mishra, Advocate ..... Defendant versus LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. + 11 UJJVAL CONSTRUCTIONS CS(COMM) 540/2017 & O.A. 105/2018 & I.A. 11519/2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Vikas Kumar, Mr.Aliya Durafshan and Mr.Manish Paliwal, Advocates versus LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. Through: Mr.A.C. Mishra, Advocate ..... Defendant JUDGMENT (ORAL) I.A. 11519/2018 & I.A. 11521/2018 1. The delay in filing the appeals is condoned. Both applications are disposed of. O.A. 106/2018 & O.A. 105/2018 2. The defendant has challenged the order dated 26th July, 2018, whereby the learned Joint Registrar has dismissed the defendants applications for condonation of delay in filing the written statements and has directed the CS(COMM) 538/2017 & CS(COM...
Tag this Judgment!