Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 21 of about 750 results (0.017 seconds)Mrs. Deepak Kaur vs.s. Hari Simran Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~OS-13 * % + CS(OS) 453/2017 Date of decision:21. 02.2019 ..... Plaintiff IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MRS. DEEPAK KAUR Through Mr.Amit Bhagat and Mr.Amit Dwivedi, Advs. Versus S. HARI SIMRAN SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ritu Raj Jamwal and Mr.Mohit Yadav, Advs.for D-1, 2 and 4 Mr.Bijoy Kumar Ms.Madhusmita Bora, Advs. for D-3 Pradhan and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.12960/2018 1. This application is filed by defendant No.1 under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC with section 11 and 151 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a final decree of partition of the suit property by metes and bounds and for separate share of the suit property. The immovable property in question is 5, Jantar Mantar Road, New Delhi-110001. Plaintiff claims to be the joint undivided owner and in joint possession of 20% undivided share of the suit property. It is the case of the plaintiff that the...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep @ Piddi vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 02.2019 CRL.REV.P. 587/2018 & CRL.M.A. 12589/2018 PRADEEP @ PIDDI versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. G. C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Govind Puri, PS Uttam Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 19.03.2018, whereby the Trial Court has rejected the application of the petitioner claiming juvenility.2. The Trial Court noticed that there was no record of the school available and accordingly ossification test was conducted. The Medical Board opined the age of the petitioner as between 20-22 years.3. Noticing the record of the Medical Board the Trial Court rejected the application raising the claim of juvenility and held the petitioner to be major i.e. 18 years of age on the dat...
Tag this Judgment!Holiday Club vs.gajraj Singh
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI HOLIDAY CLUB Date of Decision:21. 02.2019 W.P.(C) No.4935/2008 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Radhalakshmi R., Adv. versus GAJRAJ SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.K. Sharma, Adv. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM No.27183/2017 (Under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act) 1. This is an application filed by the respondent/workman praying for a direction to the petitioner/management to pay him his last drawn wages from the date of the impugned Award.2. Before dealing with the rival contentions of the parties, it may be appropriate to note that the writ petition filed on 11th July, 2008, impugns the Award dated 28th June, 2003 passed by the learned Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts at Delhi, whereunder the petitioner has been directed to reinstate the respondent/workman along with 60% of his last drawn wages w.e.f 3rd October, 1988. The record shows t...
Tag this Judgment!Paresh Kumar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 994/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3956/2019 PARESH KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr. R.K.Rahul, Advocates ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shubhang Mr. Ranveer Dabas, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.693/2015, under Sections 354-A/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Preet Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 6th August, 2018 (Annexure P-6) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Shubhang on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the Crl...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar Aggarwal & Anr vs.reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.153/2019 20th February, 2019 VINOD KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate. versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.153/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 8169/2019 & 8172/2019 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 03.10.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs by noting that despite repeated opportunities, the plaintiffs witness failed to appear for cross-examination, and thus there being no evidence led on behalf of the appellants/plaintiffs, hence the RFA No.153/2019 Page 1 of 4 appellants/plaintiffs have failed to prove their case seeking rendition of ac...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.rajbir
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 02.2019 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. + W.P.(C) 1739/2019 & C.M. Nos.8086-8087/2019 Through: None. RAJBIR versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/North Delhi Municipal Corporation impugns the Award dated 24.03.2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Dwarka Courts in ID No.181/16. Under the said award, the Industrial Tribunal has directed the petitioner/management to regularise the respondent/workman from the date when other similarly situated persons, who had been appointed on muster rolls basis alongwith the respondent, were regularised.2. The facts as emerge from the record are that the respondent had joined the erstwhile Municipal Corporation as a Mali/Beldar on 27.01.1984 in which post he continued to work till 24.03.198...
Tag this Judgment!India Infoline Finance Limited vs.harshad Hirji Thakkar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP(I) (COMM) No.53/2019 + % INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED20h February, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi and Mr. versus HARSHAD HIRJI THAKKAR Through: Shivank Diddi, Advocates (9958260000) ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.2674/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM) No.53/2019 2. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act). The petition has been OMP(I)(COMM) No.53/2019 Page 1 of 21 filed by the petitioner India Infoline Finance Limited. The petitioner is the creditor and the respondent is the debtor on account of the respondent availing a credit of Rs. 10,00,00,000 under the Master Credit Facility Agreement dated 15.09.2018. It was pleaded that that the market value of the shares pledged by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr vs.naveen Mahajan & Anr
Court: Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 899/2016 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. with Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advs. Versus NAVEEN MAHAJAN & ANR Through: Mr. Abhai Pandey with Mr. Varun Sharma & Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advs. ..... Defendants AND CS(COMM) 900/2016 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. with Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advs. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW NAVEEN MAHAJAN & ANR Through: Mr. Abhai Pandey with Mr. Varun Sharma & Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advs. ..... Defendants The plaintiffs instituted these two suits, against the same defendants, 1. for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing registered designs no.219309, 224813, 252225, 230893 & 262661 of the CS(COMM) Nos.899/2016 & 900/2016 Page 1 of 5 plaintiff and from passing off their goods as those of the plaintiffs and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suits were entertained ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Suri vs.archaeological Survey of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 06, 2019 Judgment delivered on: February 20, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4099/2018, CM Nos. 16145/2018 & 46395/2018 RAJEEV SURI Through: Mr. Jayant Tripathi, Mr. Mayantara Roy and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Deepak Goyal, Adv. for UOI Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Mr. Jeemon Raju, Advs. with AR for R4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: That in the facts and circumstances set out in the petition, and the Grounds taken therein, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be graciously pleased to:-"A. Issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the monument of Shaikh Ali Gumti in Defence Colony W.P.(C) No.4099/2018 Page 1 of 7 available with the......
Tag this Judgment!Atul Kumar Mittal vs.indian Institute of Technology Delhi Through Its ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 01.2019 Pronounced on:20. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 9777/2017 & CM APPLN. 4747/2019 ATUL KUMAR MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Divyanshu Sahay, Adv. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate with Mr.G.D. Bahuguna, Supdt, (Legal) for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner has prayed as under: (i) Issue writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the departmental appeal dated 15.03.2017 filed by the... Petitioner before the Visitor of the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi under section 13(10) of the Statutes of the Institute and quash the order of dismissal of the departmental appeal [as W.P.(C) 9777/2017 Page 1 of 32 communicated to the... Petitioner vide Letter No.100203/2017/IESI/ U-1, dated 25.10.2017 (Anne...
Tag this Judgment!