Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohit Rathi vs.state of Nct of Delhi& Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4351/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS MOHIT RATHI versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI& ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr.Vijay Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Mursalin Khan, P.S.Jagatpuri Mr.Shivender Kr.Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.103 of 2013 under Sections 354A/354D of the IPC registered at Police Station Jagatpuri, New Delhi, based on a settlement. Charges have been framed under Section 354D. The parties were known to each other as they were studying in 2. CRL.M.C. 4351/2018 Page 1 of 3 the same school.... Petitioner is alleged to have misbehaved with the complainant consequent to which the FIR has been registered.3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the part...
Sanjeev Kumar Bhambra & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4368/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 SANJEEV KUMAR BHAMBRA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Saurabh. Mr. K.S. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 30901/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4368/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.357 of 2017 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Govind Puri, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR CRL.M.C. 4368/2018 Page 1 of 3 was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and settlement dated 29.05.2018 has been e...
Gopal Jha vs.state Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1386/2018 versus GOPAL JHA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr.Manish Kaushik, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sonu Siwach, P.S.Sarai Rohilla. Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey, Adv. for complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.189/2018 under Sections 376/376D/5IPC, Police Station Sarai Rohilla.2.... Petitioner has been in custody since 15.05.2018. The allegations made by the complainant are that her husband who was staying with her used to bring his friends and in his presence would permit them to make physical relations with her against her wish. BAIL APPLN. 1386/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been f...
Manish Dubey vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2018 Decided on:28. h August, 2018 CRL.A. 132/2016 MANISH DUBEY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Karamvir Singh, PS North Rohini. CRL.A. 184/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate versus + NAVIN THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Karamvir Singh, PS North Rohini. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Manish Dubey and Navin challenge the impugned judgment dated 16th December, 2015 convicting them for offences punishable under Section 397 IPC read with Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 22nd December, 2015 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years each and to pay a fine of 2,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period...
Sachin Saini & Ors vs.govt. Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3492/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 SACHIN SAINI & ORS versus GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Pawan Kaushik, Advocate with petitioners in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. Mr. Amarjeet Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. SI Vikas Kumar, PS Dwarka South. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.541/2017 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC, Police Station Dwarka South.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant is the purchaser of the roof above the second floor from the builder. It is alleged that the petitioners are the purchasers of the second floor. There was a dispute with regard to the roof rights above the second CRL.M.C. 3492/2018 Page 1 of 3 floor.... Petitione...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.babli & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 28, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 869/2015 & C.M. 27364/2015 PREM LATA & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 870/2015 & C.M. 27054/2015 BABLI & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 873/2015 & C.M. 27063/2015 LALITA & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates Page 1 of 8 MAC.APP. 869/2015 MAC.APP. 870/2015 MAC.APP. 873/2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th July, 2015 rendered by Motor Accident 1. Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compe...
Phool Singh Yadav vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2018. RSA1212018 CHANCHAL DEVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Mr. Avdhesh Nuniwala and Mr. Sachin, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: None. ..... Respondent AND RSA1222018 PHOOL SINGH YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Mr. Avdhesh Nuniwala and Mr. Sachin, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CMs No.34762/2018 & 34763/2018 in RSA No.121/2018 & CMs No.34766/2018 & 34767/2018 in RSA No.122/2018 (all for exemption) Through: None. ..... Respondent Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of.1. 2. RSAs 121/2018 & 122/2018 Page 1 of 18 RSA1212018 & CM No.34761/2018 (for stay) & RSA1222018 & CM No.34765/2018 (for stay) 3. These two Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugn the judgments and decree [both dated 31st May, 2018 in RCA No.01/2017 and RCA No.56/201...
Simmi Kathpal vs.hanuman Mandir Public School and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~36 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:28. h August, 2018 + W.P. (C) 6840/2017 SIMMI KATHPAL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Ashutosh Dixit and Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advs. versus HANUMAN MANDIR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan and Ms. Akshay Pathak, Advs. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The prayer in this writ petition is essentially for issuance of a direction, to the Respondent No.1-School (hereinafter referred to as the School) to comply with the directions contained in the order, dated 29th April, 2017, passed by the Deputy Director of Education (hereinafter referred to as the DDE).2. Paras 2.1 to 2.8 of the writ petition are completely irrelevant, in so far as the controversy in issue is concerned. The relevant facts, which commence from para 2.9, may be culled out as under: W.P.(C). 6840/2017 Page 1 of 12 3. On 24th August, 2015, the petiti...
Krishna Bahadur Dahal vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~41 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1611/2018 KRISHNA BAHADUR DAHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Nitin Rai Sharma and Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing trial (in session case no.1357/16) in the court of the Special Judge on the charge for offence under Section 20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The case had reached the stage of final arguments when application was moved by the prosecution under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) for permission to examine two more witnesses. The said application was allowed by the Special Judge by order dated 05.03.2018, which is impugned by the petition at hand under Section 482 Cr. PC. Crl. M.C. No.1611/2018 Page 1 of 2 2. Having heard the counsel on both sides and having gone throu...
Gaurav Kumar vs.satish Kumar & Ors. (Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 28, 2018 + MAC.APP. 95/2018 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr.Pavan Kumar, Advocates versus + MAC.APP. 348/2018 GAURAV KUMAR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. P.S. Goindi, Advocate 1. GAURAV KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.S. Goindi, Advocate versus SATISH KUMAR & ORS. (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr.Pavan Kumar, Advocates for respondent- Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 23rd November, 2017 grants compensation of `63,56,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to injured-Gaurav, aged 27 years, on account of grievous injury suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 7th September, 2009. MAC.APPs. 95/2018 & 348/2018 Page 1 of 8 2. In the above-captioned first appeal, Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Insurer) seeks reduction in ...