Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahesh Kumar (Minor) Through His Father Bhoop Singh Gurjar vs.union of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
#63,70,71 & 72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8207/2018 PRIYANK SHRARMA versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8247/2018 MAHESH KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER BHOOP SINGH GURJAR ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8248/2018 SANCHIT KAPOOR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8252/2018 KARTIK SINGH SAWHNEY versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8207/2018, W.P.(C) 8247/2018, W.P.(C) 8248/2018 & W.P.(C) 8252/2018 Page 1 of 6 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Manu Beri, Mr. Prasenjit Keswani and Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 8207/2018 Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Advocate in W.P.(C) 8247/2018, 8248/2018 & 8252/20 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for UOI Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and M...
Educare Limited & Anr. Vs.s. K. Sachdev & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2018. + CS (COMM) 107/2018 EDUCARE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advocate. (Mob.9560386043) versus ..... Defendants S. K. SACHDEV & ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Advocate. (Mob. 9811081980) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 6818/2018 1. This is an application under Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC filed by the Plaintiffs seeking amendment/modification of the list of witnesses.2. Brief background of this matter is that the Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off, damages, etc., of the trade mark SHRIRAM SCHOOL. Issues were framed in the matter on 3rd March, 2015. One of the issues framed is: (1) Whether the use of the name Shree Ram World School by the Defendants amount to passing-off their services as and for that of the Plaintiffs, as alleged?. OPP 3. The Plaintiffs hav...
Barkha Ram vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~41 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2018 W.P.(C) 1044/2018 & CM No.4364/2018 (stay) BARKHA RAM ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. R. V. Sinha, Mr. A. S. Singh, Mr. Amit Sinha, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Mr. Harvesh Kumar, AD for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 11th January, 2018 in PPA No.296/2016 of the Court of District Judge, New Delhi acting as Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order [No.EC/09/AD/LIT/2016/T-1(Sub) dated 29th August, 2016 of the respondent No.4 Estate Officer, Directorate of Estates]. of eviction of the petitioner from quarter No.E-195, Moti Bagh, New Delhi allotted to the petitioner by virtu...
Rajesh Kumar vs.babuddin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2018 CRL.L.P. 563/2018 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Mahavir Singh and Mr.Rajkamal, Advocates. versus BABUDDIN Represented by: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.30955/2018 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 119 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. No.30956/2018 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions CRL.L.P. 563/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 22nd August, 2017 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act), the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. The facts leading to the present case are that the petitioner, who was the supplier of eggs, supplied eggs to the respondent worth 3,39,000/- from ...
Shri Sandeep Khandelwal and Ors. Vs.registrar Cooperative Societies an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~37. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8969/2018 and CM APPL. 34483/2018 1. SHRI SANDEEP KHANDELWAL AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Yadav with Ms. Anita Tomar, Advocates and petitioner No.1 in person. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur and Mr. Surender Chawla, Advocates for R-1/RCS. Mr. Asutosh Lohia, Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Soumya Kumar, Mr. Sanyam Khetrapal and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Advocates for R-2 with R-2, Mr. Narinder Singh, R.O. in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioners claiming to be ORDER2908.2018 the Secretary, Vice President, Joint Secretary and Member, respectively of the Navniti Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (in short Society) praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 06.08.2018 issued by the respondent No.2, appointed as the Administ...
Kamla Sharma vs.pawan Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. 08.2018 RC REV.153/2016 KAMLA SHARMA Through Versus PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. Respondent Through Mr.Manish Kumar and Mr.Ashwani Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the order dated 15.7.2015 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) allowing the application for leave to defend filed by the respondent/tenant.2. The Eviction Petition was filed by the petitioner for eviction of the tenanted premises i.e. one room/godown on the ground floor of property No.116-A, Kamla Nagar, Delhi-110007.3. The petitioner has filed three separate eviction petitions against three separate tenants occupying separate rooms in the same property. The Eviction Petition is based on common questions of fact and ...
M/S Tanaria Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs.national Highways Authority of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 172/2017 M/S TANARIA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD...... Appellant Through Mr. S. Sharma, Advocate versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITYOF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. V. K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Gupta, Mr. Noopur Dubey and Mr. Aneesha Sadhwani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL):1. This intra court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns order dated 30.05.2017 whereby application filed by the appellant for condonation of delay of 240 days in refilling of the objections under Section 34 of the A&C Act has been rejected. FAO (OS) (Comm.) 172/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. The impugned order records that as per Section 34(3) objections...
Ravinder Kumar Sehgal vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~13 & 14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. h August, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 904/2018 RAVINDER KUMAR SEHGAL Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 927/2018 NIKHIL SEHGAL & ANR. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates for... Petitioners. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Suneel Siddhu, P.S. Parliament Street. Mr. Karan Preet Singh, Advocate for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This petition under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks release of the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in case FIR No.103/2017 dated 16.09.2017 Bail Appln. Nos.904 & 927 of 2018 Page 1 of 8 under sections 406/420/467/468/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Parliament Street, New Delhi.2. The ab...
Amit Sahni vs.election Commisssion of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 08.2018 Through:... Petitioner-in-person. ........ Petitioner $~ * + W.P.(C) 9023/2018 AMIT SAHNI versus ELECTION COMMISSSION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R-1/ECI. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Rajat Gava, Adv. for R-2/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO RAJENDER MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL): CM APPL. 34707/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9023/2018 1.... Petitioner, who appears in person and claims to be a practising Advocate has filed this writ petition in public interest and the prayer made by the petitioner in the writ petition reads as under: i) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus/or any other appropriate writ/order/direction, thereby issue directions to the respondents to take appropriate action to make requisite amendments in Rule 39(2)(b), Rule 70, Rule 73(2)(e) of the ...
M/S Morgan Securities & Credit Pvt Ltd vs.nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 825/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 M/S MORGAN SECURITIES & CREDIT PVT LTD ........ Petitioner versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Rohit P. Raman with Ms. Shweta Sharma, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal with Ms. Hemlata Kharayal and Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocates for R-2 & 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 27.09.2017, whereby, the Court of ACMM has directed that the complaint cases filed by the petitioner under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act be transferred to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, which is seized of the FIR No.103/2009 under Section 406 IPC Police Station Barakhamba Road. It is informed that the said FIR has been registered consequent to an order passed, in a complaint case filed by respondent No.2, un...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »