Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Puneet Kumar Arora vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4358/2018 Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 PUNEET KUMAR ARORA ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Pradeep, P.S.Begumpur Ms.Natasha Rani, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 30862/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4358/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1140 of 2014 under Sectionsof the IPC registered at Police Station Begumpur, CRL.M.C. 4358/2018 Page 1 of 3 New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The parties were neighbours at the time of the incident. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner had attempted to hit the children of the locality who were playing because a ball with which they were playing had ...
Chanchal Devi vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2018. RSA1212018 CHANCHAL DEVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Mr. Avdhesh Nuniwala and Mr. Sachin, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: None. ..... Respondent AND RSA1222018 PHOOL SINGH YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Mr. Avdhesh Nuniwala and Mr. Sachin, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CMs No.34762/2018 & 34763/2018 in RSA No.121/2018 & CMs No.34766/2018 & 34767/2018 in RSA No.122/2018 (all for exemption) Through: None. ..... Respondent Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of.1. 2. RSAs 121/2018 & 122/2018 Page 1 of 18 RSA1212018 & CM No.34761/2018 (for stay) & RSA1222018 & CM No.34765/2018 (for stay) 3. These two Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugn the judgments and decree [both dated 31st May, 2018 in RCA No.01/2017 and RCA No.56/201...
Rakesh Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4360/2018 RAKESH SHARMA STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Satinder Singh and Ms. Sunaina Phul, Advs. For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Karan Pal, P.S.Hauz Khas Ms. Shaheen Sheikh, Advocate. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M. A. 30867/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4360/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.172/2014 under Sections 354-D/420/511 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, New Delhi, based on a settlement. Charges against the petitioner have been framed under Section 354-D/420 of the IPC. CRL.M.C. 4360/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was working as Staff...
Navin vs.the State (n.c.t. Of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2018 Decided on:28. h August, 2018 CRL.A. 132/2016 MANISH DUBEY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Karamvir Singh, PS North Rohini. CRL.A. 184/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate versus + NAVIN THE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Karamvir Singh, PS North Rohini. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Manish Dubey and Navin challenge the impugned judgment dated 16th December, 2015 convicting them for offences punishable under Section 397 IPC read with Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 22nd December, 2015 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years each and to pay a fine of 2,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period...
Narender Kumar Singh vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 62/2018 NARENDER KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger, Mr. Sanjay Verma, Mr. Jitender Kumar and Ms. Roopa Nagpal, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Lavkesh Kumar, PS Preet Vihar Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Adv. for the R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing prosecution in the criminal case registered on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) presented on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.221/2008 of police station Preet Vihar. After compliance with the provision of Section 207 Cr. PC, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) considered the question of charge. By order dated 24.01.2017, she Crl. M.C. No.62/2018 Page 1 of 3 found no grounds to put the petitioner on trial...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.lalita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 28, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 869/2015 & C.M. 27364/2015 PREM LATA & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 870/2015 & C.M. 27054/2015 BABLI & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. + MAC.APP. 873/2015 & C.M. 27063/2015 LALITA & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates Page 1 of 8 MAC.APP. 869/2015 MAC.APP. 870/2015 MAC.APP. 873/2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th July, 2015 rendered by Motor Accident 1. Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compe...
Madhu Pamnani vs.neeraj Pamnani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h August, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 44/2018 MADHU PAMNANI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Advocate for the appellant along with appellant in person. versus NEERAJ PAMNANI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anil Sharma and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sood, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed against the order dated 25.11.2017 passed by the Principal Judge (South), Family Court, Saket by which an execution petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that while passing an interim order in a petition pending before the Guardianship Court, six conditions were laid for allowing the visitation rights which find mentioned in the order dated 05.04.2010. She further submits that the petition filed before the Guardianship Court was finally decided by an order dated 27.09.2012. The ...
M/S Shivalik Hydro Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~64 * + W.P.(C) 8975/2018 & CM No.34626-27/2018 M/S SHIVALIK HYDRO PVT. LTD. AND ANR......... Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, Addya Mishra and Ms. Jyoti Chaturvedi, Advocates. versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Shanker Mathur, Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Ms. P. Singh and Ms. Deepabali Datta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2808.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the Suspension Order dated 20.02.2018 (hereafter the impugned order) issued by the respondent (hereafter BHEL), whereby BHEL has suspended W.P.(C) 8975/2018 Page 1 of 10 business dealings with petitioner no.1 (hereafter SHPL) for a period of three years. Factual Background 2. On 01.06.2012, BHEL issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for the work of Dismantling, Renovation, Erection, Testing, Commissioning and Handing over Operating Unit Plant to OPHC Unit No.1 to...
Saloni Mahajan vs.rahul Vig & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2085/2016 SALONI MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaaul, Ms. Madhuri Dhingra & Mr. Shoumya Karmakar, Advs. versus RAHUL VIG & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Osama Suhail & Mr. Mohit Thareja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner was concededly married to the first respondent on 31.07.2010 and out of their cohabitation, a male child took birth on 30.11.2011. The marriage of the parties ran into rough weather sometime around 28.08.2011 when the first respondent left for Denmark statedly in connection with his gainful employment there. The petitioner felt constrained to file a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (no.C- 616/1/12), inter alia, seeking maintenance allowance to be awarded.2. The first respondent, while resisting the said petition, filed an affidavit disclosing his income and assets, cop...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -3 vs.oriental Pathways ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~36, 39, 40, 41, 47, 49 * + THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL -3 ITA9292018 & CM No.34866/2018 Date of decision:28. h August, 2018 ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate ORIENTAL PATHWAYS ( NAGPUR) PVT. LTD...... Respondent THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL -3 ITA9322018 & CM No.34867/2018 Through WITH ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate ORIENTAL PATHWAYS ( NAGPUR) PVT. LTD...... Respondent Through WITH ITA9332018 & CM No.34868/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL -3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate ORIENTAL PATHWAYS ( NAGPUR) PVT. LTD..... Respondent Through versus ITA9292018+connected Page 1 of 16 WITH ITA9342018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL -3 ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate ORIENTAL PATHWAYS ( NAGPUR) PVT. LTD.... Respondent Through WITH ITA9412018 & CM No.34879/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENT...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »