Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Bhajan Singh vs.national Council for Teacher Education & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
#100 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 9036/2018 RAM BHAJAN SINGH ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Mayank Manish and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi and Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India instituted on behalf of the petitioner prays as follows:-"A. Issue an appropriate writ(s)/direction(s) or order(s) directing to respondent No.2 to intimate the current status of the petitioner institution application bearing W.P.(C) 9036/2018 Page 1 of 3 B. C. application ID No.NCRAPP13840 dated 23.06.2015, and/or; Direct the respondents to process the application of the petitioner institution for the B.Ed. course; and/or Pass any such other order/direc...
Ravinder Kumar vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~59 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5633/2017 and CM No.23564/2017 RAVINDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sunil K. Goel and Mr Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advs versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, SC with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advs for L&B/LAC Mr Venkatesan, Adv for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.578 (1-16) and 58(0-4) total measuring 2 bighas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Gokulpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') resulting from Award No.2004/1967 dated 29.09.1967 be declared as null and void and also be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Co...
Siddharth Chandra vs.state of Nct & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~36 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4006/2016 Decided on:28. h August, 2018 SIDDHARTH CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Pratap Sigh, Ms. Rukmini Mukherjee and Mr. Sumeet Kaul, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing prosecution in a criminal case (CC no.12022/1/10) registered on the criminal complaint of the second respondent (complainant). He had been summoned in the said case alongwith certain other accused including the company described as M/s. Intercon Infotech Pvt. Ltd. in which he was a director and an authorized signatory at the relevant point of time. The criminal case entered the stage of trial upon notice under Section 251 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) being served on the petitioner and other co-accused on 12.08.2011 stating the accusations constituting ...
Pramod Gupta vs.cement Corporation of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2018 + CS (OS) 1549/2014 & I.A. 16253/2015 PRAMOD GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Vivekanand, Advocate. (Mob. 9810149231) versus CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kailash Pd. Pandey and Mr. Deepak, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff under Section 14 and 1. 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Defendant Cement Corporation of India, has filed objections to the award under Sections 30 and 31 of the 1940 Act.2. A contract relating to interior/construction work for the Cement Corporation of India Complex was awarded to the Plaintiff on 4th July, 1988. The work was to be completed within 12 weeks i.e. 3th October, 1988. Extensions were sought and were granted. According to the Defendants, extensions were required because of the Plaintiffs defaults but according to th...
Allied Icd Services Ltd. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:27. h August, 2018 W.P.(C) 13770/2009 ALLIED ICD SERVICES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K.K.Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gunjan Kumar and Mr. Anshul Rai, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Mukesh ........ RESPONDENTS Kumar Tiwari and Mr.Abhishek Rana, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Swesh Choudhary and Mr.Bhavya Dubey, Advs. for Deptt. of Customs. + W.P.(C) 3912/2010 THAR DRY PORT ........ Petitioner Through Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gunjan Kumar and Mr.Anshul Rai, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advs. for R-1/UOI. WP(C) No.13770/2009 and connected matters Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 6543/2010 THAR DRY PORT ........ Petitioner Through Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gunjan Kumar and Mr.Anshul Rai, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through ...
Mrs. Kulpreet Kaur vs.the Deputy Inspector General Central Industrial ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8935/2018 MRS. KULPREET KAUR ........ Petitioners Through: Ms Manmeet Arora, Ms Pavitra Kaur and Mr Keshav Sehgal, Advocates. versus THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE ..... Respondent Through: Mrs Suman Chauhan with Mr Assistant Singh, Harminder Commandant, CISF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2708.2018 Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM APPL. 34353/2018 1.2. W.P.(C) 8935/2018 & CM APPL. 34352/2018 3. under:-"The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to comply with the terms of the Impugned Contract dated 16.11.2017 and extend the Impugned Contract by a period of at least two and a half (2) months so as to enable the... Petitioner to seek an alternative livelihood; W.P.(C) 8935/2018 Page 1 of 5 b) Issue a writ of Certiorari directing...
Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5053/2017 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil K. Goel with Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Ms. Mrinalini Sen with Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocates for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit of LAC has been handed over in Court. The same is taken on record.2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra no.1146 measuring 14 bighas 8 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Mehrauli, District South, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed t...
Earnest @ Aik vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2018 Delivered on:27. h August, 2018 CRL.A. 1112/2016 EARNEST @ AIK ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Amicus Versus Curiae and Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE Represented by: Mr. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, Special Cell. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1st October, 2016 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS whereby appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 21(c) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act') and the order on sentence dated 5th October, 2016 sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Manvinder Singh Marwah @ Romy, the co-accused, was also convicted und...
A Parthasarathy vs.swami Parthasarathy & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h August, 2018 + CS (COMM) 349/2018 A PARTHASARATHY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Aditya Dewan, Ms. Iti Agarwal Verma and Ms. Tamanna Goyal, Advocates with Mr. Siddharth Jain in person. (M:9560795595) versus SWAMI PARTHASARATHY & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Ms. Sona Babbar and Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocates. (M:9810651177) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 11394/2018 in CS (COMM) 349/2018 1. The present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages, etc. was instituted by the Plaintiff on the ground that one of his literary works known as Vedanta Treatise: The Eternities , 11th edition was infringed by the Defendants by publishing a book titled Vedanta for Modern World. The case of the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff is a world renowned philosopher and had published the said work after over 30 years of research. He is a philosopher wel...
Somaya Gupta vs.jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 7915/2018 SOMAYA GUPTA versus ........ Petitioner JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Ms Sneha Mukherjee, Advocate. :Ms Ginny Jetley Rautray and Ms Anushka Ashok, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, challenging the constitution of the Internal Complaints Committee (hereafter ICC) constituted in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereafter the Act).2. The petitioner claims that the ICC is biased as it was constituted by the Executive Committee of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (hereafter the University) which includes the Vice Chancellor and Rector-I of the University against whom the petitioner has made a complaint of sex...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »