Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajender Jaina vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2018. RAJENDER JAINA RSA1642017 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Adv. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. ..... Respondent This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 11th January, 2017 in RCA No.45145/2015 of the Court of Additional District Judge (West)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 6th May, 2015 in CS No.564/2014 (Unique ID No.02401C01331922007) of the Court of Civil Judge (West)]. of dismissal of a suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondent/defendant Delhi Development Authority (DDA).2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 4th July, 2017, when, without indicating the substantial question of law, if any arising, whic...
Pankaj @ Sandeep @ Bachcha vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 663/2018 & Crl.M. (B) 995/2018 PANKAJ @ SANDEEP @ BACHCHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate with Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for State ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2708.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th February 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pilot Court, North District, Rohini, Delhi in SC No.483/2017 arising out of FIR No.382/2016 registered at PS Jahangir Puri whereby the Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC, Section 341 read with Section 34 IPC, Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 455 read with Section 34 IPC but was acquitted for the offence under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC. The appeal is also directed against the order dated 26th Februa...
In the Matter of Radiant Life Care (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd. (In vol.liqn.) Vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~CP-48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:27. 08.2018 + CO.PET. 9/2018 IN THE MATTER OF RADIANT LIFE CARE (DELHI) PVT. LTD. (IN VOL.LIQN.) ............ Petitioner Through Kunal Sharma, Advocate for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA9582018 By this application the OL prays winding up of the company Radiant Life Care (Delhi) Private Limited and to finally dissolve it from the date of filing the application Application is taken on record and stand disposed of. CO.PET. 9/2018 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) seeking for Voluntary Winding up of RADIANT LIFE CARE (DELHI) PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company), from the date of the filing of the instant petition. CO. PET. 15/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The record shows that the said Company in issue was incorporated on 06.01.2010, vide registration No.1977...
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Int ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~44 to 48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.916/2018 Date of decision:27. h August, 2018. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT. TAX), ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.917/2018 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT. TAX), ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.918/2018 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT. TAX), ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. ITA9162018 & connected Page 1 of 14 INCOME TAX APPEAL No.919/2018 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Himanshu S...
Management of Hindustan Times Ltd. Vs.aita Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 5607/2016 & CMs 2731/2017, 1681/2018 & 16193/2018 Judgment reserved on:10. 08.2018 Date of judgment:27. 08.2018 MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Abhishek M. Singhvi, Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Mr.Raj Birbal, Senior Advocates along with Ms.Raavi Birbal, Ms.Meghna Mishra, Mr.Ankit Rajgarhia, Mr.Naman Joshi and Ms.Riya Singh, Advocates. versus AITA RAM & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Meenakshi Arora, Senior Counsel with Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Mr.V.Madhukar, Mr.Sachin Dev and Mr.Rajnish Kumar Singh, Advocates. Sharma CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. It needs no emphasis that if a man is deprived of his livelihood, he is deprived of all his fundamental and constitutional rights and for him the goal of social and economic justice, equality of status and of opportunity, freedom enshrined in the Constitution remains illusory. WP (C) 5607/2016 Page 1 of 40 Therefore, the approach of the Cou...
Spicejet Ltd. Vs.siesta Hospitality Services Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : July 24, 2018 % Judgment pronounced on decision : August 27, 2018 + FAO (OS) (COMM) 40/2018 & CM APPL. 9333-9334/2018 SPICEJET LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Samrat Nigam, Mr. Amit Punj & Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Advs. versus SIESTA HOSPITALITY SERVICES LTD. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Awantika Manohar and Mr.Dhawesh Pahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1. In this appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 'the Act') the appellant SpiceJet Ltd. (in short 'SpiceJet') impugns the order of 07.12.2017 by a learned Single Judge. The impugned order FAO (OS) (COMM) 40/2018 Page 1 of 15 allowed a Section 34 petition challenging the arbitration award of a Tribunal dated 06.12.2014.2. Briefly...
Pradeep Kashyap vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4291/2018 PRADEEP KASHYAP versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate with petitioners in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Marya Nagar. JUDGMENT2708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.87/2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Maurya Enclave.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled and the terms of settlement have CRL.M.C. 4291/2018 Page 1 of 3 been mentioned in paragraph 6 of the petition. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, pass...
Sh. Amit Raj & Ors. Vs.state (n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4334/2018 SH. AMIT RAJ & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Arun Kumar with Mr. Raghav Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvender Verma, APP for the State. SI Ravi Poonia, PS Seemapuri. Respondent No.2 in person. JUDGMENT2708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30789/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4334/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.615/2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, CRL.M.C. 4334/2018 Page 1 of 3 Police Station Seemapuri.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.3 i...
Ajay Agarwal vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d August 2018 Decided on:27. h August 2018 + W.P. (CRL) 1971/2018 & Crl.M.A.12159/2018 SANJAY AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. Kartikeya Singh, Mr. R.P. Saini and Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....Respondents versus Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC. Mr. Satish Agarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel for DRI. + W.P. (CRL) 1977/2018 & Crl.M.A.12179/2018 AJAY AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. Kartikeya Singh, Mr. R.P. Saini and Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....Respondents versus Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC. Mr. Satish Agarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel for DRI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL W.P. (Crl) Nos. 1971/2018 & 1977/2018 Page 1 of 21 JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. These are two wri...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.new World Synthetics Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.806/2018 Reserved on:09. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:27th August, 2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus NEW WORLD SYNTHETICS LIMITED, ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Through SANJIV KHANNA, J.Present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for short) assails the order dated 5th February, 2018 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal for short) in the case of New World Synthetics Limited (the respondent-assessee, for short). The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2005-06, for which year the respondent-assessee had filed its return on 30th October, 2005, declaring a loss of Rs.32,27,360/-.2. The issue raised in the present appeal relates to addition of Rs.2,61,72,160/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 41(1) of the ITA No.806-2018 Page 1 of 7...