Skip to content

Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 23 2018

Deere & Company & Anr vs.mr. Malkit Singh & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #9 CS(COMM) 738/2018 DEERE & COMPANY & ANR Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Pravin Anand with Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola and Ms. Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates versus MR. MALKIT SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. J.Sai Deepak with Mr Rohit Mittal and Mr Avinash K. Sharma, Advocates Date of Decision:23. d April, 2018 $~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 3692/2018 1. Despite the matter being vehemently argued by learned counsel for plaintiffs on 16th March, 2018, this Court did not pass an ex-parte injunction order, but a short notice was issued as it was of the view that an injunction would have very serious consequences and the defendants should be given one opportunity to plead their case. Consequently, this Court while issuing CS (COMM) 738/2018 Page 1 of 10 notice had directed the Registry to specifically state that the matter would be taken up for hearing on the date fixed and no adjournme...


Apr 23 2018

Manish Singhla vs.union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~21 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11007/2017 and CM No.46292/2017 % Date of decision :23. d April, 2018 MANISH SINGHLA Through : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav ........ Petitioner and Mr. Amuropp Panda, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. S. Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Siddharth Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The petitioner in this case was appointed as a Director of the company being MSPG Trading. As such, the petitioner continued as a Director only till 02nd June, 2017 when he resigned. As such the petitioner ceased to be the Director of the company by operation of law.2. It has additionally been stated in the writ petition that the petitioner had also submitted formal resignation to the Board of Directors of the Company. However, the returns which were required to be filed by the company to this effect were not filed. As such the ...


Apr 23 2018

Undis Vatvedt Singh vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 960/2018 & Crl.M.A.3520/2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2018 UNDIS VATVEDT SINGH STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Madhav Khurana with Mr. Varun Singh Thapa, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Vipin Kumar, PS IGI Airport. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2304.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.223/2015 under Sections 25/Arms Act, Police Station IGI Airport as also Order- on-Charge dated 11.01.2018.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner, who is a Norwegian national, was travelling to Norway from Delhi. During scrutiny one live cartridge was found in her Check-in Baggage. CRL.M.C. 960/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had gone to visit the relatives of her husband in Nabha, ...


Apr 23 2018

Chetna Fab Finish vs.sudha Collection

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 23rd April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 264/2018 CHETNA FAB FINISH ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. K. S. Aryu, Advocate versus SUDHA COLLECTION Represented by: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 7398/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exception. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 264/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd January, 2018, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2.... Petitioner Chetna Finish Fab, through its proprietor Raj Kumar, filed complaint case No.6146under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short 'NI Act') stating that Sudha Collection (respondent) through its proprietor C. V. Ramana Rao was engaged in export of home products. Chetna Finish Fa...


Apr 23 2018

Bajaji D. And Anr. Vs.air India Engineering Services Ltd (Aiesl) and A ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order: April 23, 2018 W.P.(C) 3972/2018 & CM156732018 BAJAJI D. AND ANR. Versus Through: Mr. Suresh Tripathy, Advocate ........ Petitioners AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD (AIESL) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Roshan Lal Goel and Mr. Rishesh Mani Tripathi, Advocates for respondent No.2-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. This Court vide order of 4th April, 2018 had directed first respondent to consider petitioners Representation of 22nd May, 2017 and 18th January, 2018 regarding sending of petitioners on Director General Civil Aviation Approved B-1 course conducted by respondents.2. Impugned order of 10th April, 2018 (Annexure P-5) decides petitioners Representation without addressing the issue raised in the Representation. All that has been said in impugned rejection order (Annexure P-5) is that petitioners were inducted as AME-Trainees in JEOC (Jet Engi...


Apr 23 2018

Kiran Sachdeva & Anr. Vs.amarpal Singh & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~R-5 to 7. * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1617/2006 S.AMARPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: None. versus SMT. SURINDER SACHDEVA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. for R-1 & 2. EFA112009 SURENDER SACHDEVA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. versus AMARPAL SINGH Through: None. EFA122009 KIRAN SACHDEVA & ANR. Through: None. versus AMARPAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondent ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA CM(M) 1617/2006 & conn. Page 1 of 5 % The parties to the litigation from which these three matters have come ORDER2304.2018 1. up are related to each other. The summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs. 11,60,000/- had been filed on the original side of this Court, it having been registered as CS (OS) 1188/1985. The suit...


Apr 23 2018

Monalisa Kosaria vs.ministry of Women and Child Development and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~43 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4037/2018 Date of decision :23. d April, 2018 % MONALISA KOSARIA ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person versus MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ........ RESPONDENTS ORS. Through : Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC for R-1 & 2 with Mr. Gaurav Rohilla Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC- GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. and Insp.Vijay Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition makes a grievance against the manner in which the Delhi Police solved complaints of cyber crimes against women and seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus to the Delhi Police with regard to registration of FIRs, the investigation into the crimes and collection of evidence. Primarily, the petitioner is aggrieved with W.P.(C)No.4037/2018 Page 1 of 7 regard to the delayed reaction of the police upon receipt of such complaints.2. Appearing on advance...


Apr 23 2018

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.rishi Pal & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~4 & 5 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 195/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Mr.Pavan Kumar, Advocates. versus RISHI PAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for respondent no.1. + MAC.APP. 862/2017 RISHI PAL Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Mr.Pavan Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award dated 11th January, 2018 whereby compensation of Rs.11,65,000/- has been awarded to the claimant. MAC. APP. 195/2017, 862/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. The appellant in MAC.APP.195/2017 is seeking reduction whereas appellant in MAC.APP.862/2017 is seeking enhancement of the award amount.3. The accident dated 13th August, 2010 resulted in grievous injuries to Rishi Pal. The claimant was admitted in Mah...


Apr 23 2018

s.amarpal Singh vs.smt. Surinder Sachdeva & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2018

$~R-5 to 7. * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1617/2006 S.AMARPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: None. versus SMT. SURINDER SACHDEVA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. for R-1 & 2. EFA112009 SURENDER SACHDEVA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. versus AMARPAL SINGH Through: None. EFA122009 KIRAN SACHDEVA & ANR. Through: None. versus AMARPAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondent ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja & Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advs. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA CM(M) 1617/2006 & conn. Page 1 of 5 % The parties to the litigation from which these three matters have come ORDER2304.2018 1. up are related to each other. The summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs. 11,60,000/- had been filed on the original side of this Court, it having been registered as CS (OS) 1188/1985. The suit...


Apr 21 2018

Vishal vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-21-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 21, 2018 + CRL.A. 830/2015 VISHAL Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, DHCLSC Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sumit of Police Station Aman Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The present Appeal arises from the impugned judgement dated 27th March 2015, passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, North-West District, Rohini Delhi, holding the Appellant guilty of culpable homicide amounting to murder and convicting him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter `IPC') 2. The Appellant was tried in FIR No.128/2013, registered at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi, on the charge of murdering Madan Lal Soni on 26th March, 2013 at about 10:15 p.m. at D-18, Inder Enclave-II, Mubarakpur, Delhi. The Trial Court, convicted the Appe...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial