Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indira Bahuguna and Ors vs.lt Governor of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:2. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3905/2017 INDIRA BAHUGUNA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Mund and Mr. R.K Tiwari, Versus Advocates. LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate Ms. L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, learned counsel for the LAC submits that the counter affidavit is ready, the same has been handed over in Court today.2. With the consent of the parties the petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.'s 990 (4-16) and 930 (2-5), situated in the revenue estate of village Satbari, Tehsil Saket, New Delhi (hereinaf...
Tapan Kumar Deo vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 02, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7050/2017 & C.M.29264/2017 TAPAN KUMAR DEO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Achintya Dvivedi & Mr. B.P.Pandey, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Ms. Vidhu Mohan, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Seerat Deep Singh & Ms.Sneh Suman, Advocate + W.P.(C) 7053/2017 & C.M. 29268/2017 PRATAP SINGH AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms.Prachi Gupta, Mr.Manu Mridul & Ms.Spandana Gunda, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Ms. Vidhu Mohan, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Seerat Deep Singh & Ms.Sneh Suman, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) W.P.(C) 7050/2017 & W.P.(C) 7053/2017 Page 1 of 4 1. In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of two sepa...
Reliance Communications Ltd. Vs.atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~28 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 19/2018 Date of Judgment:2. d February, 2018 RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ravindra Srivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shally Bhasin, Mr. Chaitanya Sahay and Mr. Raghav Pandey, Advocates versus ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Rishad A. Chowdhury, Mr. Krishnayan Sen and Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocates for respondent no.1. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivek Trehan, Ms. Fareha Ahmad Khan and Ms. Jhanavi Mitra, Advocates for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CAV.PET.89/2018 1. Mr. Sethi, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, appears on behalf of the caveator.2. Accordingly, the Caveat Petition stands disposed of. FAO(OS)(COMM).19/2018 Page 1 of 5 CM.APPL40534054/2018(Exemption) 3.4. Exemption allo...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.ram Roop & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1011/2015 & C.M. 32164/2015 1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus RAM ROOP & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N.Prashar, Advocate for claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 12th October, 2015 grants compensation of `7,17,300/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondents-claimants on death of one- Krishan Kumar , son of Ram Roop, aged 20 years, who had died in a vehicular accident on 16th January, 2008 while he was driving motor cycle of third respondent herein. The factual position of this case stands already noted in the impugned Award and so, needs no reproduction.2. Suffice to note that apart from evidence of Ram Roop, father of deceased (PW-1/A) and eye witness Sunil Kumar (PW-1), there is evidence of Nagendera Paswan (R2W1), from the office of Regional Transport Authority (RTA), who has proved the dr...
Mohd Irshad Khan vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2140/2017 MOHD IRSHAD KHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka,Adv. for R-1/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For orders see Crl.Rev. P. 963/2017. INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY02 2018 SU...
Dharam Pal vs.ranbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~A-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision 02.02.2018 + RC.REV. 73/2017 & CM APPL. 6048/2017 DHARAM PAL Through Mr.A.K.Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus RANBIR SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kapil Kr.Dagar and Mr.Prikshit Chaudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order dated 27.08.2016. The respondent/landlord has filed the eviction petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25(B) of the DRC Act for a property bearing No.C-60, Vijay Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi. In the eviction petition, it has been pleaded that the petitioner requires the suit property for his bona fide needs as he wants to open a mobile shop for his son Bhushan Vashisht who is presently unemployed.2. It is also pleaded that the respondent has no other commercial or suitable premises t...
Rajinder Valecha & Anr. Vs.satpal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:05. 12.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:02.02.2018 RFA5902016 RAJINDER VALECHA & ANR. ..... Appellants/plaintiffs. Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra & Mr. Amit Sanduja, Advocates. versus SATPAL & ANR ......... RESPONDENTS/defendants. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is the impugned judgment and decree dated 16.05.2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge (North-East)-01, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (in short learned ADJ) by which the civil suit No.114/2016 of the appellants/plaintiffs was dismissed against both the respondents/defendants.2. The brief facts for disposal of this appeal are that the appellants, who are husband and wife filed a civil suit for recovery of Rs.33,35,000/- against the respondents, who are also husband and wife. It is alleged by the appellants in their plaint that on the request of the respondents they had advanced them a f...
M/S. Superon Schweisstechnik India Limited vs.m/s. Geetech India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 642/2017 & I.A. 11217/2017 M/S. SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIK INDIA LIMITED Through Mr.D.K. Yadav, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S. GEETECH INDIA ..... Defendant None Through Date of Decision:02. d February, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. In the order dated 31st January, 2018, it has been recorded that learned counsel for the defendant wished to withdraw his vakalatnama, since he was not receiving any instructions from the defendant.2. As none appears for the defendant even today, it is proceeded ex-parte.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff gives up prayers (b), (c) and (d) of the prayers to the suit. The statement made by learned counsel for plaintiff is accepted by this Court and plaintiff is held bound by the same. CS (COMM) 642/2017 Page 1 of 5 4. He further states that in view of the judgment of this Court in Satya Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Satya Infra & Estates ...
Ayush Lohia and Anr vs.land Acquisition Collector (South) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10840/2015 Date of Judgment :2nd February, 2018 AYUSH LOHIA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. N.S. Dalal with Mr. Amit versus Dhankar, Advocates. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (SOUTH) AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.84(4-3), 84(1-12) and 84(3-4), total land measuring 8 bighas 19 biswas, to the extent of 1/5th share out of the same, situated in the revenue estate of village Satbari, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land), stand lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation ...
Mohd Parvej & Ors vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2018 CRL.REV.P. 963/2017, Crl.M.A.No.21373-74/2017, Crl.M.A.No.706/2018 MOHD PARVEJ & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka,Adv. for R-1/UOI. + BAIL APPLN. 2140/2017 MOHD IRSHAD KHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka,Adv. for R-1/UOI. + BAIL APPLN. 2149/2017 MOHD PARVEJ ........ Petitioner CRL REV. P. 963/2017 & Bail Appns.2140 /2017, 2149/2017 Page 1 of 9 Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka,Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mar.Pramod Bahuguna, Advocate for R-2/Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »