Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maharaj Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7294/2016 MAHARAJ SINGH Date of Judgment:05. h February, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Richa Oberoi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep, Advt. for UOI. Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Adv. for LAC/ L&B. Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of the petitioner falling in Khasra no.253 measuring 1 bigha and 1 biswa, situated in the revenue estate of village Saidulajab, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 A...
Suresh Sharma vs.shailesh Awasthi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SURESH SHARMA RFA No.110/2018 5th February, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Dr. Abhishek and Mr. Dalip Singh, Advocates. SHAILESH AWASTHI versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.4325/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.4326/2018 (delay in filing) & CM No.4327/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the applications, delays in filing and re-filing are condoned. CM stands disposed of.1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.110/2018 Page 1 of 7 impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.8.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for possession and damages with respect to the suit property bearing no.21/22, Flat No.6, First Floor, Krishna Nagar, Safdarjung Enclave,...
M/S Geo Miller & Co Pvt Ltd vs.bihar Urban Infrastructure Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:5. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2940/2017 & CM No.12833/2017 M/S GEO MILLER & CO PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.D. Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Mr. Kamla Prasad, Mrs. Surabhi Shukla and Mr. Jitender Singh, Advs. versus BIHAR URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PVT LTD AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shivam Singh, Mr. Anand Miglani and Ms. Apoorva Srivastava, Advs. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL)1) After some arguments, Mr. S.D. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner says that he will withdraw the captioned writ petition and file his action in the appropriate court, provided the interim protection granted by this Court continues to operate till such time a decision is taken at least qua the interim order.2) Mr. Shivam Singh, who appears on behalf of the respondents says he would have no difficulty if the interim order passed by this W.P. (C) 2940/2017 Pag...
Kartik Solanki vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + KARTIK SOLANKI BAIL APPLN. 293/2018 Judgment delivered on:05. 02.2018 ........ Petitioner STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : versus ..... Respondent Mr K.K.Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr Sameer Chandra and Mr Rajesh Kaushik Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State. Insp Prem Kumar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0502.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 2209/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 293/2018 1. This is the second petition filed by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.390/2017 under section 419/457/3IPC; Police Station Bhalswa Dairy.2. It is noticed that the first anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by a detailed speaking order dated 03.11.2017. The Court has, inter alia, recorded as under:-"BAIL APPLN.293 /2018 Page 1 of 3 3. 8. It has been revealed from th...
Shiv Dutt Sharma vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:5. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1870/2016 SHIV DUTT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to his 1/2nd share i.e. 2 Bighas and 14 Biswas comprised in Khasra No.414 (5-8), situated in the revenue estate of village Ghonda Gujran Khadar, Delhi, (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as neither physical possession of the land has bee...
Smt. Satyawati @ Satwanti vs.ministry of Child and Development and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~56 * + W.P.(C) 1053/2018 & C.Ms. 4391-92/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI1 SMT. SATYAWATI @ SATWANTI Through: Mr. Parmesh Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus MINISTRY OF CHILD AND DEVELOPMENT AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER0502.2018 Vide impugned order of 30th June, 2017 (Annexure P-1), petitioners service as Anganwadi worker stands terminated by the concerned officer of Department of Women and Child Development, Government of NCT of Delhi. In this petition, quashing of impugned order of 30th June, 2017 and reinstatement of petitioner with back wages is sought.2. At the outset, learned counsel for first respondent, submits that there is a jurisdictional issue. While drawing attention of this Court to Section 14 of The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 it is asserted by W.P.(C) 1053/2018 Page 1 respondents counsel that for the relief claimed in this petition, petitio...
Arun Arora vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:05. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 827/2016 ARUN ARORA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K.Rout, Mr.U.D.Bhargava and Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondent/LAC-L&B. Ms.Aastha Jain and Mr.Rishi Ahuja, Advocates for respondent/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in court; the same is taken on record.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioner admeasuring 1 bigha comprised in Khasra No.731 and 734, situated in the revenue estate of village Tuglakabad, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand W.P. (C) No.827/2016 Page 1 of 7 lapsed i...
Azhar Ahmed vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:5. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7927/2016 AZHAR AHMED Through: .....Petitioner Shri Sonal Anand and Shri Ayush Sai, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Shri Paritosh Anil, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Akhil Mittal, Advocate for LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.57 (1-08), measuring 01 Bigha and 08 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Behlolpur Khedar, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as neither th...
Dal Chandra Rastogi vs.central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~39 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1069/2018, CM Nos.4455-4456/2018 Date of decision:5. h February, 2018. SIDDHARTH RASTOGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms.Ananya versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ANR. Kapoor, Mr.Sumit, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate + W.P.(C) 1070/2018, CM Nos.4457-4458/2018 DAL CHANDRA RASTOGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms.Ananya versus Kapoor, Mr.Sumit, Advocates Respondents CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The writ petitioners, namely, Siddharth Rastogi and Dal Chandra Rastogi, had filed declarations of undisclosed income of WP(C) Nos.1069/2018 & 1070/2018 Page 1 of 6 Rs.44,57,940/- and Rs.40,11,000/- respectively under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 in ter...
Balvir Singh vs.securities & Exchange Board of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:05. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 4517/2017, CM APPL.19724/2017 ........ Petitioner BALVIR SINGH Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hiren Dasan, Mr. Uday Gupta, Mr. Chand Qureshi, Ms. Shanti Pandey and Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Advocates. Versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. J.Srinivas, Officer from SEBI. Ms. Surabhi Anand, Advocate for R-3. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 24.03.2017 passed by the Recovery Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereafter referred to as Recovery W.P.(C) 4517/2017 Page 1 of 16 Officer). By virtue of this order, the Recovery Officer has in effect, attached all accounts, lockers whether held singly or jointly by the petitioner.2. It is not in dispute that pursuant to this orde...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »