Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2018 ASHOK KUMAR CRL.A. 715/2017 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellant Ashok Kumar impugns a judgment dated 30.01.2017 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.8967/2016 arising out of FIR No.136/2014 PS Delhi Cantt. by which he was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (in short POCSO Act). By an order dated 31.01.2017, he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine `50,000/- each under both the offences.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge-sheet was that on 28.02.2014 at around 04.30 p.m. in Jhuggi No.T-61, East Mehram Nagar, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi, t...
Kamla Devi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* + % KAMLA DEVI STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST. CAS. 48/2000 versus 2nd February, 2018 Through: None. ........ Petitioner Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) TEST. CAS. 48/2000 and I.A. No.15216/2010 (under Section 151 CPC) 1. This matter is on the Final Board of this Court since 12.11.2017, no one appears for the petitioner or the objector although it is 12 noon. I have therefore gone through the entire record and am proceeding to decide the case.2. This testamentary case is filed by the petitioner Smt. Kamla Devi seeking probate of the Will dated 26.5.1995 said to be executed by one Sardar Gurcharan Singh Dhingra who expired at TEST CAS. 48/2000 Page 1 of 10 Delhi on 18.6.1995. At the time of his death the deceased Sardar Gurcharan Singh Dhingra was residing at SFS Flat No.143, Hauz Khas, New Delhi. It is this Hauz Khas property which the petitioner claims ...
Satish Kumar vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7045/2016 SATISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Date of Judgment :2nd February, 2018 Through Mr. Puneet Sharma with Ms. Iti Sharma, Advocates. versus CORAM: GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Arush Chikersal, Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of the petitioner admeasuring 237 sq. yds. out of Khasra no.487/1, situated in the revenue estate of village Kilokri, Tehsil Mehrauli, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.khushi Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 97/2017 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Archna Gaur & Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocates Versus KHUSHI RAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankul Nagpal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL Impugned Award of 20th December, 2016 grants compensation of `21,21,067/- to respondents-claimants with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondents-claimants on account of death of one Deepak Goyal in a vehicular accident on 5th September, 2011. The factual position of this case stands already noted in the impugned Award and so needs no reproduction.2. Suffice to note that learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has relied upon evidence of claimants / family members and while taking the age of deceased to be 28 years, as reflected in the Pan Card and High School Marks Sheet, has MAC.APP.97/2017 Page 1 assessed income of dece...
Mohd Parvej vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2149/2017 MOHD PARVEJ ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka,Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mar.Pramod Bahuguna, Advocate for R-2/Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For orders see Crl.Rev. P. 963/2017. INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY02 2018 SU...
Kailash Kumari & Anr vs.shakuntla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d February, 2018 RC.REV. 6/2017 KAILASH KUMARI & ANR Through: Ms. Ritu Jain, Adv. ........ Petitioners SHAKUNTLA Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Devinder Singh Khatana and Mr. Sagar Lal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the judgment [dated 16th July, 2016 in E.No.(Unique Case ID No.02406C0031342012) of the Court of Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi]. dismissing the application of the two petitioners for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the sole respondent and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioners from Shop No.7 on ground floor of property no.67, Village Garhi, Main Market, East of Kailash, New Delhi as shown in red colour in the site plan filed with the petition for eviction.2. This petition came up first before this ...
Shashikant Thakur & Ors vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:2. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 981/2018 SHASHIKANT THAKUR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Shambhu, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashim Sood, CGSC with Ms. Payal Chandra, Adv. CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL)1) Issue notice.2) Mr. Ashim Sood accepts notice on behalf of respondents.3) Learned counsel says that he does not wish to file a reply in view of the fact that for the moment the issue raised in the writ petition is covered by the judgment dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C) No.11307/2017, titled Raman Nanda vs. Union of India and Ors.4) Briefly, the grievance of the petitioner is that they have been disqualified by the respondents on account of the fact that final statements and returns in respect of two companies, namely, Dew Speciality Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Dew Envirotech Pvt. Ltd. have not been filed. W.P. (C) 981 /2018 Page 1 of 35) To b...
Lotus Herbals Limited vs.the Chief Commissioner of Custom & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~1 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 110/2016 LOTUS HERBALS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mohan Vidhani with versus Mr.O.P.Bansal and Mr.Ashish Singh, Advocates. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms.K.Enatoli Sema, Advocate for D-1. Ms.Anjali J.Manish with Ms.Nidhi Saini, Advocates for D-2. Date of Decision:02. d February, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, directions etc.2. Learned predecessor of this Court vide order dated 19th September, 2013 had restrained the defendants from selling any goods under the trademark LOTUS or any mark bearing the word LOTUS either as a suffix or prefix. CS (COMM) 110/2016 Page 1 of 4 3. Today learned counsel for defendant no.2 reiterates that defendant no.2 had placed an order for unbranded goods with defendant no.3. She ...
Pallav Mongia vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 12006/2015 & C.M. No.31848/2015 ........ Petitioner Through Mr Ashish Virmani, Mr Pankaj Singh, Mr Sabyasachi Bhandari, Advocates along with petitioner in person. versus PALLAV MONGIA UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Rohit Thakur, Deputy Director, Mr Deevyendra Ameta, Asst. Director, for UOI. Mr Simranjeet Singh, Ms Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocates for Respondent No.2/Air India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0202.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning paragraph 3.2 of the Civil Aviation Requirement dated 06.08.2010 (hereafter the impugned CAR) issued by respondent no.3 (Director General of Civil Aviation - hereafter DGCA).2. The petitioner claims that he was scheduled to travel from Delhi to Patna on 12.12.2015 and was due to return on 13.12.2015. He, accordingly, booked tickets with respondent no.2 (Air India) well...
Karan Sharma vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2018 CRL.REV.P. 962/2017, Crl.M.A.No.21365/2017, Crl.M.A.No.703/2018 KARAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms.Priyanka, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr Pramod Bahuguna, Advocate for R-2/Customs. + BAIL APPLN. 891/2017 KARAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh K. Sharma and Mr.Deepak Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Sanjay Pal, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Sanjeev Narula, Counsel Abhishek Ghai, Adv. Sr.Standing for Customs with Mr. CRL REV. P. 962/2017 & Bail Appn. 891/2017 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. 2. This order shall dispose of both the aforenoted petitions. Criminal revision petition (No.962/2017) has assailed the order of ch...