Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lacoste & Anr vs.aman Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~OS-3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2705/2014 LACOSTE & ANR Date of Decision:01. 02.2018 ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Kangan Roda and Ms.Shreya Sethi, Advs. versus ..... Defendants AMAN JAIN & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This suit is filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent injunction directing the defendants, etc. from using the trade mark LACOSTE and Crocodile Device or any other mark or trade mark deceptively or confusingly similar to the said trade mark. Other connected relies are also sought.2. It is the case of the plaintiffs that it is a registered proprietor of LACOSTE (Stylized) and Crocodile Device in India. Details for registration are given in para 4 of the plaint. It is pleaded that the history of these trademarks goes back to early 1930s. Plaintiff No.1 was founded by the famous tennis player Jean Rane Lacoste who won mens single tournament twice at Wimbledon in 1925 and 1928 and other ten...
Rajender @ Raju @ Ganju vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Mahesh Syal vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~9 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:01. 02.2018 + C.M. APPL. Nos.28421/2017 & 34087/2017 in W.P.(C) 4698/2017 Through: Mr. V.K. Ohri, Adv. ........ Petitioner MAHESH SYAL THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for R-1&2. Mr. Manish Vashisht, Ms. Trisha Nagpal and Ms. Astha Gupta, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL)1) In this writ petition, the following substantive prayers have been sought for by the petitioner: (a) Direct the Respondent no.3 to remove herself and her son from the property No.Must. No.46, Killa nos. 3(4-02) 4 (4-16), (3-18) 6 Min (3-08), 7 (4-16) & (1-100), now known as Syal Farm, 6, Green Avenue, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi so that the... Petitioner and his wife can stay peacefully at the self acquired above mentioned property in their old age; (b) a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ of the similar nature directing the Respondent no.1 to constitute Appellat...
Sushma Kumari vs.girijesh Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.777/2017 % SUSHMA KUMARI1t February, 2018 Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus GIRIJESH GUPTA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prashant Diwan and Mr. Brijesh Diwedi, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.777/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.33032/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the daughter-in- law/defendant No.1 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 22.7.2017 whereby the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the mother-in-law/respondent no.1/plaintiff and has passed a decree for possession with respect to the third floor of the property bearing No.WZ-3335, Mahendra Park, Near Rani Bagh, Delhi-110034. RFA No.777/2017 Page 1 of 13 Appellant/defendant No.1 has also been injuncted from handing over the suit property being the t...
Lt. Col. Hawa Singh Jattayan (Retd.) vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 586/2018 & CM No.2566/2018 LT. COL. HAWA SINGH JATTAYAN (RETD.) Through: Mr T. L. Garg and Mr Rohan ........ Petitioner Garg, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Ms Anumita Chandra and Mr Brajesh Kumar, Govt. Pleader for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0102.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 08.09.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Director General Resettlement (hereafter DGR). By the impugned order, the petitioner has been dis-empanelled from DGR Coal Loading and Transportation Scheme.2. The Directorate General Re-Settlement, Ministry of Defence has floated various schemes for providing an opportunity of employment to ex-servicemen. One such schemes is of sponsoring ex- W.P.(C) 586/2018 Page 1 of 9 servicemen for taking up the work of loading/unloading and transportation of ...
Mohd Shafeeq vs.yogesh Kumar Verma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t February, 2018 CM(M) 414/2017 and CM APPL.14240/2017 (stay) MOHD SHAFEEQ ........ Petitioner Through: M. Mohsin Israily, Advocate with M. Saif Islam Israily, Advocate versus YOGESH KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma Advocate for R-1 along with R-1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The controversy raised through the petition at hand arises out of proceedings in the civil suit (CS No.525/2016) in which the respondents 1 to 2 herein are the plaintiffs and the petitioner herein is the defendant no.1.2. The suit was instituted praying for relief in the nature of possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction. It was filed in 2013 and had reached the stage of trial when there were certain defaults on the part of the defendant (i.e., the petitioner). This is confirmed by the copy of the proceedings recorded on 27.10.2016 revealing that though one of the defenda...
Kalu @ Vijay Pal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Rashmi Raikhy & Anr vs.the State of National Capital Territory Delhi & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : FEBRUARY01 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 2196/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.144RASHMI RAIKHY & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Ms.Anandini Kumari, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC. Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate for R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition under Articleof the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of LOC (Look Out Circular) in FIR No.against them and also for quashing of the order dated 09.04.2015 of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. The writ petition is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. W.P.(C) No.2196/2015 Page 1 of 5 3. The respondent No.4 was married to Arun Handa (since Proclaimed Offender) on 23.11.2008 at Delhi. After her marriage, respondent No.4 went to U...
Dinesh vs.state of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 756/2018 and CM APPL. 3156/2018 1. DINESH Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh and Mrs. Shweta Sinha, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for R-1/GNCTD and R-2/DSSSB. Mr. Dheeraj Gupta, Advocate for R-3/MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is aggrieved ORDER0102.2018 by the order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the Tribunal, dismissing O.A. No.401/2015 filed by her, wherein she had sought quashing of the order dated 05.12.2014, issued by the respondent No.1/GNCTD and the respondent No.2/DSSSB, declaring her overage for the post of Primary Teacher, in pursuance to the Advertisements No.004/2009 and 070/2009. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2017 passed by the Tribunal, dismissing the review application filed by her f...
Sanjay Kumar Jutshi @ Bunti vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 416/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 02.2018 SANJAY KUMAR JUTSHI@BUNTI Through : versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: Through : ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr Bankim K.Kulshrestha and Mr V.S.Nirmal, Advocates. : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State. ACP Rajender Bhatia, PS V.Vihar. ACP Rajender Bakshi. JUDGMENT0102.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A.1600/2018(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 416/2018& Crl. M.A. 1601/2018(stay) CRL.M.C. 416/2018 Page 1 of 3 1. The The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.01.2018, whereby the objection of the counsel for the petitioner/Defence, to the objection raised by the Public Prosecutor with regard to the nature of questions being put, has been rejected.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at the time o...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »