Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aero Club of India Pvt. Ltd & Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:02. 02.2018 RESERVED ON:03. 01.2018 + LPA4462016, CM APPL.28738-28739, 46287/2016, 31616- 31617 & 37057/2017 AERO CLUB OF INDIA PVT. LTD & ANR. .....Appellants Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS LPA4472016, CM APPL.28744-28745, 46288/2016 & 37061/2017 AERO CLUB OF INDIA PVT. LTD & ANR. .....Appellants Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Mr. Krishna Datta Multani, Advs. for appellant No.2. Ms. Anjana Gosain and Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Advocates for R-1 in LPA Nos.446/2016 & 447/2016. Mr. Rajesh Gogna and Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Advocate for R- 1/UOI in LPA No.447/2016. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Ms. Chetna Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates for R-2 & 3 with Mr. Puneet Gupta, APD, SAP (AAI), Mr. Raama Sharma, AM (Comm), AAI, Ms. Bhavya, Manager (Law), AAI and Mr. Akanya, AM (Law), AAI. LPA-446 & 447/2016 Page 1 of 2...
Veerpal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~1 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :2. d February, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 821/2017, CRL. M. B. 2207/2017, CRL. M. A. 17715-17716/2017 + HARISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Adv. with Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 922/2017, CRL. M. B. 2195/2017, CRL. M. A. 20329/2017 VEERPAL ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Naomi Chandra, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petitions have been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of the judgment dated 01.05.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.18/2016, whereby the findings of conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court were endorsed. By a judgment dated 28.01.2016, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate had found both the petitioners CRL. REV. PET. 821/2017 & 922/2017 Page 1 o...
Amarjeet Pandey vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + AMARJEET PANDEY BAIL APPLN. 2340/2017 Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2018 ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms Sonika Tyagi. Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State. SI Sandeep Singh, PS I.P.Estate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0202.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.10/2017 under SectionsIPC read with Section 6 POCSO Act, 2012. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.01.2017.2. The petitioner was taken in custody, consequent to an FIR registered on 15.01.2017, on the complaint of one Ram Manohar Sharma, who had alleged that he was a resident of the Ashram of one Swami Santosh Anand and in that Ashram, there was also a male BAIL APPLN.2340 /2017 Page 1 of 4 child of six years of age.3. The FIR alleges that on 14.01.2017, the complainant found the ch...
Vikas Chandel vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1 * + W.P.(C) 6298/2014 VIKAS CHANDEL Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev.P.Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj & Mr.Surender Kumar, Advocates ORDER0202.2018 The petitioner is seeking quashing of OM dated 19.07.2013 issued by % 1. the Directorate General, SSB rejecting a representations made by him and two other personnel regarding the anomalies in the fixation of their pay and for stepping up of pay.2. The petitioner was recruited as a Constable in the Medical Cadre of the respondent No.2/SSB on 06.02.2004 in the pay-scale of `3050-75-3950. On 01.01.2006, the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission was accepted by the Central Government and on applying the said recommendations, all the Constables in the SSB including the petitioner W.P.(C) 6298/2014 Page 1 of 4 herein were grant...
Pratap Singh Ahluwalia vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 02, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7050/2017 & C.M.29264/2017 TAPAN KUMAR DEO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Achintya Dvivedi & Mr. B.P.Pandey, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Ms. Vidhu Mohan, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Seerat Deep Singh & Ms.Sneh Suman, Advocate + W.P.(C) 7053/2017 & C.M. 29268/2017 PRATAP SINGH AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms.Prachi Gupta, Mr.Manu Mridul & Ms.Spandana Gunda, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Ms. Vidhu Mohan, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Seerat Deep Singh & Ms.Sneh Suman, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) W.P.(C) 7050/2017 & W.P.(C) 7053/2017 Page 1 of 4 1. In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of two sepa...
Alok Kumar vs.high Court of Delhi Thr Registrar General and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~33, 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:2. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 382/2018 ALOK KUMAR Through: Mr. Arun Maitri, Mr. Alok Kumar and ........ Petitioner versus Ms. Radhika Chandrashekhar, Advocates HIGH COURT OF DELHI THR REGISTRAR GENERAL AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. + W.P.(C) 603/2018 Chaitanya Puri, Advocates TARUN CHANDIOK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mahir Malhotra and Mr. Varun Chandiok, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THR REGISTRAR GENERAL AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. for Puri, Advocates Chaitanya respondent no.1. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC with Mr. Manashwy for respondent no.2. Jha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL W.P. (C) Nos.382/2018 & 603/2018 Page 1 of 5 G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL26542018(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 603/2018 1.2. ...
Sky Light Hospitality Llp vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:2. d February, 2018 W.P.(C) 10870/2017 and CMNo.44503/2017 SKY LIGHT HOSPITALITY LLP ........ Petitioner Through Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Madhur Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -28(1), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Sky Light Hospitality LLP, a limited liability partnership, who had on 13.05.2016 taken over and acquired rights and liabilities of M/s Sky Light Hospitality Private Limited upon conversion under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, has filed the present writ petition impugning notice dated 30.03.2017 for the assessment year 2010-11 under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short).2.... Petitioner also impugns the order dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Assessing Offic...
Devi Lal Jain vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 02, 2018 W.P.(C) 923/2018 & C.M. 3906/2018 DEVI LAL JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.C.Gupta and Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocates Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. V. Govinda Ramanan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner was compulsorily retired on 3rd February, 2012 and he challenges impugned order of 7th November, 2012 (Annexure P-2) whereby pension of `6,38,980/- was credited to his account.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had made several Representations to respondents to seek full pension instead of 2/3rd pension and the said Representations have not been responded to, thereby compelling petitioner to serve a legal notice of 5th September, 2017 (Annexure P-8) upon respondents. It is further submitted that there is no response to the said legal notice also.3. Learned counsel for respondents ...
Simla Devi and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:02. d February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7031/2015 SIMLA DEVI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Prateek Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Mr.Nikhil Kumar and Mr.Atul Krishna, Advocates for respondent no.1/UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti for respondent/LAC-L&B. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for respondent/DDA. Advocate Tyagi, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, Ms.Luthra, learned Senior Counsel submits, on instructions, that land of the petitioner Janak Rani, mentioned at serial no.6 in Khasra No.58 pertains to only 1 bigha and not 1 bigha 6 biswas as reflected in the writ petition.2. The petitioners, who are ten (10) in number seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transpare...
Standing Conference of Public Enterprises vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h October 2017 Pronounced on:01. t February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5830/2004 STANDING CONFERENCE OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES Through Mr. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Advocate ........ Petitioner with Mr. Inderjit Singh, Advocate versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Sanchita Ain, Ms. Azra Rehman, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. C.K. Bhatt and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1 The Standing Conference of Public Enterprises (known, to the citizenry by the acronymous appellation SCOPE) has moved this Court, by means of the present writ petition, challenging the order dated 16th February 1996, as well as the award, dated 2nd December 2003, of the Industrial Tribunal-II (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) passed in ID No.212/1995 (Management of M/s. Standing Conference of Public Enterprises v. Workmen as...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »