Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhruv Bhasin and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:5. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11516/2016 DHRUV BHASIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Puri, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi Adv. for L&B/LAC. Ms. Anjuna Gosain Adv. for R-2 Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.193 min, measuring 13 Bighas and 14 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Bijwasan, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred ...
United India Periodicals Pvt Ltd vs.cmyk Printech Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1074/2016 & I.A. 8916/2017 UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate with Mr.Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Advocate. versus CMYK PRINTECH LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Learned Amicus Curiae. Mr. Suyash Singh, Advocate for Mr. O.P. Gupta/R-1. Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Ms. Anubha Singh and Mr. Shishir Raj, Advocates for R-2 & 3. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Reserved on :15. h December, 2017 Date of Decision:5. h February, 2018 MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT I.A. 3831-3833/2017 in CS(COMM) 1074/2016 1. I.A. 3831/2017 has been filed by the defendant-applicant under Order XXIII Rules 3 & 3A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CS(COMM) 1074-2016 Page 1 of 29 CPC) challenging the compromise settlement dated 11th November, 2016 arrived at between the plaintiff on one hand and the defendant on the other hand in terms o...
M/S Parmatma India Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:05. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1002/2016 M/S PARMATMA INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K.Rout and Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advts. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Advts. for LAC/L&B. G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC. Let the counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra nos.min, 12 min, 1 bigha 18 biswas, situated in village Singhu, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is ...
Ms. Meenakshi Sharma & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 05, 2018 W.P.(C) 1033/2018 MS. MEENAKSHI SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Yatender Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD & Mr. N.R. Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Claim of petitioners is that they were working on contractual basis in respondent No.3-School as Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) and PET (Primary Education Teacher) and they had made Representations to respondent Directorate of Education claiming that their appointment was on regular basis but they were made to work on contractual basis. Vide order of 4th December, 2017 (Annexure P-26), respondent - Directorate of Education has directed respondent- School to restore the service of petitioners, if they fulfill educational qualifications as per Recruitment Rules and grant them all the prescribed ...
M/S Sunshine Enterprises vs.indian Council for Agricultural Research
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8051/2017 and CM APPLS.33142/2017 & 47466/2017 Date of decision :05. 02.2018 M/S SUNSHINE ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari and Mr. Shashwat Singh, Advs. versus INDIAN COUNCIL FOR ARGICULTURAL RESEARCH ..... Respondent Through Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % The petitioner had responded to a tender issued by the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), calling for bids for the purpose of awarding the contract for security services at its premises NASC Complex and Krishi Vihar Colony. The tender was through a two bids process (technical and financial bid). The petitioners grievance is that its bid was rejected on the alleged ground that it has not furnished particulars to indicate fulfilment of essential eligibility criteria. W.P.(C) 8051/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. The respo...
Siddharth Rastogi vs.central Board of Direct Taxes, Union of India, Mi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~39 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1069/2018, CM Nos.4455-4456/2018 Date of decision:5. h February, 2018. SIDDHARTH RASTOGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms.Ananya versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ANR. Kapoor, Mr.Sumit, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate + W.P.(C) 1070/2018, CM Nos.4457-4458/2018 DAL CHANDRA RASTOGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Ms.Ananya versus Kapoor, Mr.Sumit, Advocates Respondents CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The writ petitioners, namely, Siddharth Rastogi and Dal Chandra Rastogi, had filed declarations of undisclosed income of WP(C) Nos.1069/2018 & 1070/2018 Page 1 of 6 Rs.44,57,940/- and Rs.40,11,000/- respectively under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 in ter...
Dr. Vidya Sagar Garg vs.insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:05. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 9520/2017, CM APPL.38726-38727/2017 DR. VIDYA SAGAR GARG Through: Ms. Pallavi Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi and Mr. B.N. Dubey, Advocates. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition which is directed against the order dated 12.10.2017, passed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (in short the Board) via which, petitioners application under Regulation 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016 (in short"201. Regulation") seeking registration as an Insolvency Profession (I.P.) has been rejected via the impugned order. 1.1 Inter alia, the ground on which the petitioners application has been rejected is that he is not a fit and proper person...
Ms. Sangeeta @ Shaheen vs.abdul Ghaffar (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.102/2018 and C.M. No.3956/2018(stay) + % MS. SANGEETA @ SHAHEEN5h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate. versus ABDUL GHAFFAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 25.9.2017 by which trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for possession and damages with respect to suit property bearing no.4685, Gali Razia Begum, Hauz Qazi, Delhi-110006. Trial court has awarded damages at Rs.5,000/- per month. RFA No.102/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. There is no dispute that the respondent/plaintiff is the owner of the suit property and earlier one Sh. Ram Chander was the tenant in the suit premises and on the d...
Mr Arun Jaitley vs.arvind Kejriwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3457/2015 MR ARUN JAITLEY ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajeev Nayyar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manik Dogra, Advocate. versus ARVIND KEJRIWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Anupam Srivastava with Mr.Rishikesh Kumar, Mr.Mohd.Irsad, Ms.Shreya Mehta and Mr.Dhairya Gupta, Advocates. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:5. h February, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) O.A.No.6/2018 & I.A.No.424/2018 1. Present appeal has been filed by defendant No.1-appellant challenging the order dated 31st October, 2017 passed by the Joint Registrar, whereby his application being I.A.No.7371/2017 under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC for summoning of documents/records of DDCA was dismissed on the ground that the impugned statements were not made by the defendant No.1 on the basis of the said documents and further the said documents were not in public domain. CS(OS) 3457/2015 Page 1 of 5 2. Learned counsel for defendants-appellants submits that unde...
Ashwani Kumar vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 05, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1051/2018 & C.M. 4386/2018 1. ASHWANI KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. F.S. Chauhan, Advocate Versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Paramjeet Benipal & Mr. Nikhil Mundeja, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC & Ms. Manisha Saroha & Mr. Shubhasnh Pundir, Advocates for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, petitioner claims that he had applied for the post of Junior Technical Assistant on compassionate ground vide application of 8th August, 2011 (Annexure P-1) and vide Communication of 20th November, 2015 (Annexure P-8), petitioner has been informed by respondent that petitioner is medically unfit.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had been advised to obtain an independent medical opinion and he has done it. Attention of this Court is drawn to Medical Certificate of 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »