Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 22 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)National Marble & Sanitary Store v.v. Vs.m/s. Shalimar Paints Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.887/2017 + % NATIONAL MARBLE & SANITARY STORE V.V. ..... Appellant Manchanda, 25th October, 2017 Through: Rishi Mr. Advocate. versus M/S. SHALIMAR PAINTS LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.37623/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.37622/2017 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 37624/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 45 days in filing and 99 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.887/2017 Page 1 of 12 RFA No.887/2017 3. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 26.11.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.16,24,038....
Tag this Judgment!Central Board of Trustees vs.indcon Projects & Equipments Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~2. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 844/2015 & CM No.19050/2015 (for stay). CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Manchanda and Mr. Rajat Manchanda, Advs. versus Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. INDCON PROJECTS & EQUIPMENTS LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2510.2017 ..... Respondent 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 4th January, 2008 in ATA No.593(4)/2007 of the Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi]. passed, in the absence of the petitioner and allowing the appeal preferred by the respondent under Section 7-I of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 against the order dated 6th August, 2007 of the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (APFC), Delhi passed under Section 14-B of the Act, imposing damages for delayed remittances of PF dues. The Tribunal has, vide the impugned order, reduced the damages im...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.ninder Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 184/2017 and CM77012017 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus + MAC.APP. 824/2017 NINDER KAUR & ORS Through: None NINDER KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants versus Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) TATA AIG GEN INS. CO. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate 1. Ranjeet Singh, a bachelor, then aged 25 years, died due to the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 24.09.2012 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as a truck bearing registration no.HR-63B-2895, admittedly insured against third party risk with Tata AIG General Insurance company MACA Nos.184/2017 & 824/2017 Page 1 of 6 Ltd. (insurer). On the accident claim case (old suit no.777/2012, new MACT case no.476944/16) instituted on 31.10.2012 by the firs...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.archana Saxena & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.404/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus ARCHANA SAXENA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + MAC APPEAL No.781/2016 ARCHANA SAXENA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, Adv. Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Anupam Saxena, a bachelor, was riding on motorcycle carrying along Arun Sain on the pillion on 06.10.2010 and had reached new flyover on way to Ghaziabad at about 5.00 a.m., when his motorcycle came to strike against a motor vehicle described as Tata 407 bearing MAC Appeal No.404/2016 & conn Page 1 of 5 registration No.DL1E1008(the Tata407) which was stationary on the flyover, it admittedly having broken down, it being under the control of its driver Ba...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs.sushil Kumar Bubna
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.893/2017 % M/S MANEESH PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ..... Appellant 25th October, 2017 Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Rohan Ahuja and Mr. Mohit, Advocates. versus SUSHIL KUMAR BUBNA ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.38074/2017 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. Nos. 38072-73/2017 (for delays) 2. These are applications seeking condonation of delays of 128 days in filing the appeal and 145 days in re-filing the appeal.3. For the reasons stated in the applications the same are allowed and the delays are condoned. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.893/2017 Page 1 of 9 RFA No.893/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.38071/2017 (for stay) 4. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judg...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Ishtar Alias Istak and Anr vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~R-12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2014 + Judgment reserved on:12thOctober,2017 Judgment pronounced on:25. hOctober,2017 MOHD. ISHTAR @ ISTAK & ANR ....Appellants Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Amicus Curiae, (Advocate) for appellant No.1 Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for appellant No.2 versus 1. STATE Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL The present appeal has been instituted by the appellants under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 13.11.2013 and order on sentence dated 18.11.2013 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred as ASJ), Special Fast Track Court (North West District), Rohini Courts, Delhi in case FIR No.187/2011 registered at Police Station - Kanjhawala, New Delhi, whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code...
Tag this Judgment!Sangeeta vs.alok Kumar Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~OS-6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3048/2014 SANGEETA Date of Decision:25. 10.2017 ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Rama Shanker and Mr.Saurabh, Advs. versus ALOK KUMAR GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arvaik Sharma, Advs. for D-1 to 3. Ms.Vijay Laxmi, Proxy Counsel for D-13 to 15& 17 to 31. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.8477/2015 1. This application is filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order I Rule 10 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint and for impleading defendants No.13 to 31.2. Some of the brief facts are that the plaintiff has filed the present suit for partition, declaration and permanent injunction in respect of property No.1833, Ravidas basti, Kotla Mubarak Pur, New Delhi measuring 280 sq. yards. Unfortunately, due to the infighting amongst the family members, a complex set of facts have emerged. It is urged that the grandfather, namely, Sh.Khachheru was the absolute owner of the said pro...
Tag this Judgment!Nitin Mainy vs.ee Garrison Engineer (Vi) Electrical Supply & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~359 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL5592011 Decided on:25. h October, 2017 NITIN MAINY Through: None versus ..... Appellant EE GARRISON ENGINEER (VI) ELECTRICAL SUPPLY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant had instituted accident claim case (MACP1452010) on 27.07.2009 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on the averments that on 23.05.2009 while riding on motorcycle bearing registration no.DL-3S-BK-5094, he was hit by a motor vehicle described as Eicher truck bearing registration no.05-D-163875A of the first respondent, driven negligently by the second respondent.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 27.01.2011, accepted the said case for compensation holding the driver of the Eicher vehicle responsible. The Tribunal found, on the basis of disability certificate (Ex. PW5/1) MAC A No.559/2011 Page 1 of 3 issued...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Kumar Virmani & Anr. Vs.ganga Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~357 & 358 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL5582011 Decided on:25. h October, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate versus SANJAY KUMAR VIRMANI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC APPEAL5792011 SANJAY KUMAR VIRMANI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: None versus GANGA SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 04.02.2008, Ravinder Singh @ Raman, a bachelor, aged 37 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident involving negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-4909 admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question MAC Aeal No.558/2011& 579/2011 Page 1 of 5 with National Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant in MACA5582011), and died in the consequence. Two of his brothers, they being appellants in MACA5792011 on their behalf and on behalf of their sisters, they being A...
Tag this Judgment!Virender and Ors vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11552/2016, CM Nos. 45502/2016 & 29255/2017 Date of decision: October 25, 2017 VIRENDER AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Adv. with Mr. Lokesh Kr. Sharma with Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, St. Counsel for SDMC with Mr. Sanjeev Garg & Mr. Abhinav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Eleven petitioners have filed the present petition. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to comply with the orders passed by the Single Judge of this Court dated June 02, 2010 and October 13, 2014 permitting the petitioners 1 to 9 to carry on hawking from the plaza area of Nehru Place or any other area.2. The case of the petitioners is that they are regular street vendors and have been vending at the Nehru Place plaza area since the year 1988/1990. Aggrieved by the action...
Tag this Judgment!