Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 19 of about 590 results (0.011 seconds)Arun Jain (Huf) vs.the Commissioner, Value Added Tax
Court: Delhi
$~ * + ARUN JAIN (HUF) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4573/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Jain, Mr.Virag Tiwari, Mr. V.K. Jain, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD THE COMMISSIONER, VALUE ADDED TAX CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notice for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act), dated 14th March 2016, is set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + ON QUEST MERCHANDISING INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 6093/2017 & CM No.25293/2017 Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahana, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI...
Tag this Judgment!Solvochem vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes, Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11846/2016 & CM466762016 SOLVOCHEM Through: Mr. Raj K. Batra, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Ms Doboshree Mukherjee, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notices for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and default assessment of penalty under Section 33 of the DVAT Act, dated 16th August 2016, are set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + ON QUEST MERCHANDISING INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W...
Tag this Judgment!Jvg Finance Ltd. (In Liqn.) vs.jvg Financing and Services Limited
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:26. h October, 2017 CO.PET. No.220/2015 & CA Nos.1063-64/2015 JVG FINANCE LTD. (IN LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Shailendra Singh, Adv. for ex- versus JVG FINANCING AND SERVICES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Adv. for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Ms. Swati Setia, Adv. for RBI. management. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition is under section 433(e) and (f) of read with section 439(b) the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter as the Act) by the petitioner through the Official Liquidator for winding up of JVG Financing and Services Ltd. (hereinafter as respondent company) in its capacity of a creditor as per the direction of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2012.2. On 14.09.2017, learned counsel for the ex-management stated that he has no objection in case the company is wound up.3. The respondent Company was incorporated on 14.06.1988, under the C...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Gupta vs.vijender Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~54 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6284/2016 & CM257252016 (stay), 19385/2017 (impleadment) & Crl M.A.1427/2017 SANJAY GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr K. Datta, Mr Rahul Malhotra, Advocates. versus VIJENDER SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr Peeyoosh Kalra, Advocate with Ms Sona Babbar, Mr Swati, Advocate and Mr Yashaswini Bindal, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Institute of Cost & Works Accountants) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER2610.2017 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the 1. order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the Appellate Authority constituted under the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (hereafter 'the Act'). The impugned order was passed in an appeal preferred by respondent no.1 (hereafter 'the respondent') against an order dated 06.02.2015 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of The Institute of Cost Accountants of India (herea...
Tag this Judgment!Suvasini Charitable Trust vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + SUVASINI CHARITABLE TRUST W.P.(C) 4086/2013 & CM No.9620/2013 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Agrawal, Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Abhishek Boob, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ........ RESPONDENTS % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notices for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and default assessment of penalty under Section 33 of the DVAT Act, dated 17th August 2012, are set aside. The decision of the Objection Hearing Authority dated 25th March 2013 is also set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date ...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.pinki Saini & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-366 & 367 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL5972011 & CM6392015 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate versus PINKI SAINI & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Sunita Harish and Mr. Girish Kandpal, Advocates for R-1 to 5 + MAC APPEAL7942011 & CM164292011 GOVINDAS GLOBAL EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant None Through: versus PINKI SAINI & ORS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Sunita Harish and Mr. Girish Kandpal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 14.06.2005, a motor vehicular accident took place in which Surinder Kumar Saini died. His wife and other members of the family dependent on him (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (suit no.384/2009) before the Motor Accident Claims MAC Appeal No.597/2011 & 794/2011 Page 1 of 5 Tribunal (Tribunal) on 21.12.2005, on the basis of averments that the accident had been caused due to the...
Tag this Judgment!Mayar Health Resorts Limited vs.indian Tourism Development Corporation
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2017 + W.P.(C) 6277/2016 & CM Nos.25652/2016, 31138/2016 & 11475/2017 MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS LIMITED Versus INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Ms Manjula Gandhi, Mr Aditya Kapoor, Mr Sarthak, Ms Piyusha Singh, Mr Shivanshu Kumar, Mr Jaideep Singh and Mr Kartik Bhardwaj. : Mr Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shweta Bharti, Mr Neelesh Sinha, Ms Anamika Dubey and Mr Ravi Thakur. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 Mayar Health Resorts Limited (hereafter Mayar) has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (hereafter ITDC) be directed to renew the license granted to Mayar for running a health club at the Ashok Hotel, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi.2. This petition is, in effect, the fourth round...
Tag this Judgment!Today Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.www.indiatodayshopping.co.in & A ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 10.2017 CS(COMM) 282/2016 & IA Nos. 11426/2014, 11707/2017 TODAY MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Nishant Verma, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Setu Niket, Adv. Versus WWW.INDIATODAYSHOPPING.CO.IN & ANR...... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through None. JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. Arguments have been heard in the suit. On 21.05.2015, learned Counsel for Defendant no.2 submitted that they are not a necessary and a proper party to the suit and hence, Defendant no.2 was deleted from the array of parties. Despite several attempts of service including service through publication in newspapers- Indian Express and Dainik Jagran, none has appeared on behalf of Defendant no.1. Since, Defendant no.1 did not appear, nor written statement was filed, it was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 11.07.2017.2. The Plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction restrainin...
Tag this Judgment!Sushma Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9379/2017 & C.M. No.38224-226/2017 1. SUSHMA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. O.N. Sharma, Advocate with Mr. J.S. Bhadoria, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2610.2017 The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment dated 21.09.2017 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) dismissing her original application praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondents/Director General, All India Radio, Prasar Bharti to release the entire death benefits to her on the demise of her husband, late Jagvir Singh.2. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has dismissed the original application filed by the petitioner, with the observations that in view of the fact that late Jagvir Singh, the deceased husband of the petitioner, had filled up Form-3 on 15.7...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Ass. Co. Ltd. Vs.saroj Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10532016 THE NEW INDIA ASS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Versus SAROJ DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R1 to R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Amit Kumar, bachelor, aged 24 years, died in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 04.09.2014 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL-1PC-6613, admittedly insured against the third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer). His parents and sister they being first to third respondents (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (old No.609 14 & MACT case No.476864/16) on 11.11.2014 seeking compensation. The tribunal by judgment dated 25.10.2016 accepted the claim for compensation under section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, MAC Appeal No.1053/2016 Page 1 of 5 1988, holding the bus driver Guru Charan Singh (re...
Tag this Judgment!