Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 59 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)Jaspal Chahar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.4182/2017 Date of decision:9. h October, 2017 JASPAL CHAHAR ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Jaspal Chahar, having been declared medically unfit on account of Refractive Error B/L and denied enrollment as a sailor in the Indian Navy, has filed the present writ petition for medical re- examination at the Army Hospital(Referral and Research), Delhi Cantonment.2. The petitioner relies on medical opinion expressed in the Out Patient Record dated 09.05.2017 of the V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital enclosed as Annexure P-4. W.P. (C) No.4182/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. The respondents, as recorded in the order dated 15.05.2017, had stated that they would like to verify the authenticity of Annexure P-4. Original of Annexure P-4...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs.steel Authority of India
Court: Delhi
$~16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2017 OMP (I) (COMM.) 408/2017 M/S ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LTD. ........ Petitioner versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh with Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocates. : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Veronica Mohan, Mr. Kartik Rai, Mr. Anshul Rawat and Ms. Sukanya Basu, Advocates and Mr. Ashish Rastogi, Dy. Manager (Law), SAIL CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0910.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA No.11597/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. OMP (I) (COMM.) 408/2017 & IA No.11596/2017 (stay) 1. The petitioner, by this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, seeks a restraint on the respondent O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 408/2017 Page 1 of 4 from floating and awarding a tender for the balance work of the project which has been awarded to the p...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.praveen Kumar Tanwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-299 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL1262011 & CM167592011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus PRAVEEN KUMAR TANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant (insurer) has been burdened with the liability to pay the compensation awarded by judgment dated 13.12.2010 on the accident claim case (MACT79902/08) of the first respondent on account of death of Jai Singh in a motor vehicular accident that occurred due to the negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.DL-1G-7203. During the inquiry before the Tribunal, it had taken the plea that there was a breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy issued by it in the name of the third respondent (registered owner) in respect of the offending vehicle as it was not covered by a valid permit and further that the driver (secon...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Manzoor & Anr vs.khuyabuda Khatun & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 401/2016 and CM Nos.17603/2016 & 17568/2017 MOHD MANZOOR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sood and Mr. Vishal Vimal, Advocates versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA KHUYABUDA KHATUN & ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The motor vehicular accident that occurred on 14.08.2013 resulting in the death of Nisar Udin @ Mohd. Nissar, it becoming the cause of action for accident claim case (suit no.789/2013) in favour of the first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) involved negligent driving by the second appellant (driver) of a motor vehicle described as Tata 709 Truck bearing registration no.DL-1LE-5066 (vehicle), which is registered in the name of the first appellant (owner) and was concededly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the sixth respondent (insurer).2. While contesting the claim case, the insurer had raised the...
Tag this Judgment!Murari Sharma vs.shweta Tiwari
Court: Delhi
$~4. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) No.256/2016 Date of decision:9. h October, 2017 MURARI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Chander Shekhar Patney, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sudhanshu Sikka, Advocate. SHWETA TIWARI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra Court appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 and Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code, for short) impugns the order dated 19th July, 2016 passed by the single Judge dismissing the Chamber Appeal against the orders closing the right of the appellant Murari Sharma, defendant No.13 in CS(OS) No.109/2014, Shweta Tiwari versus The Editor-in-Chief, Amar Ujala and Company to file his written statement.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and with their consent have taken up the appeal for hearing and disposal. FAO(OS) No.256/2016 Page 1 of 5 3. Shweta Tiw...
Tag this Judgment!Irwin Bin Hassim vs.anil Kumar, Air Customs Officer, Igi Airport
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEWDELHI CRL.A. 997/2011 IRWIN BIN HASSIM Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey with Ms. Judgment reserved on 07.09.2017 Judgment pronounced on 09.10.2017 ..... Appellant Namita Wali, Advocates. ANIL KUMAR, AIR CUSTOMS OFFICER, IGI AIRPORT Versus Through: Mr. Amish Aggarwala with Mr. Respondent Satish Aggarwala, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present appeal has been instituted under Section 36B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 read with Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the judgment and order dated 26.02.11 and 11.03.11 by which the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 20 (b)(ii)(C) & Section 28 read with Section 23(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS). The present appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with fi...
Tag this Judgment!Jagdish Aggarwal & Anr vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-294 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL842011 JAGDISH AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: None versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Recovery rights were granted in favour of the first respondent (insurer) against the appellant by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal by its decision dated 26.08.2010 whereby the claim petition ( Case No.1319/08) of the claimant (the second respondent) was decided on the ground that the evidence would show that the driving licence held by the first appellant (the driver of the offending vehicle) had been issued on the basis of documents which were fake, they purporting to have been issued as driving licence by another transport authority. The appeal at hand challenges the said grant of recovery rights.2. The issue is covered by a number of judgments of this Court in similar fact-situation, on...
Tag this Judgment!Rajbir Singh vs.neeru & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-291 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 71/2011 RAJBIR SINGH Decided on:09. h October, 2017 ..... Appellant NEERU & ORS. Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On his accident claim petition (MACT182010), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by its judgment dated 12.04.2010, which was rectified later on 04.06.2010, granted compensation in favour of the appellant (claimant) in the total sum of Rs.7,17,763/- directing the third respondent (insurer) to pay the same with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. for the injuries and permanent handicap suffered on account of the motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 25.08.2006 involving negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HR-38H-9667, admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the said insurer, calculating the amount ...
Tag this Judgment!Ishjot Mehta vs.dharam Raj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-285 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.15/2011 ISHJOT MEHTA ..... Appellant Through: None. versus DHARAM RAJ & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then a child aged 9 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 05.12.2006 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL1A0510(the bus), and has been rendered permanently disabled. The accident claim case (MACT No.100/2008) was filed on her behalf by her father/next guardian on 10.05.2007 impleading the driver, owner and insurer of the said bus, they now being the first, second and third respondents respectively. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 10.05.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 20,75,000/-, directing the insurer to pay with interest @ 9% per annum, the amount having been calculated thus:-"MAC Appeal No...
Tag this Judgment!Rekha Sati vs.the State & Another (Govt. Of Nct, Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4099/2017 REKHA SATI Through: Mr.Raaj Malhotra, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE & ANOTHER (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harendra Kumar Jaggi, attorney and husband of respondent no.2 (complainant) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER0310.2017 % CRL.M.A. 16463/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4099/2017 & CRL.M.A. 16462/2017 (STAY) This matter has been listed upon mentioning. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by which the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 21.8.2015 passed in CC No.659/2013 registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Pandav Nagar; and the orders dated 1.6.2017 and 27.9.2017. Notice. Mr.Harendra Kumar Jaggi, attorney and husband of respondent no.2 (complainant), is present in Court and accepts notice. In support of his identi...
Tag this Judgment!