Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 18 of about 590 results (0.018 seconds)Mahan Polymers vs.commissioner of Vat & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7388/2017 MAHAN POLYMERS Through: Mr. Vasdev Lalwani, Mr.Rohit ........ Petitioner versus Gautam, Mr. Advocates. Rahul Gupta, Through: Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notice for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act), dated 31st March 2017, is set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + ON QUEST MERCHANDISING INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 6093/2017 & CM No.25293/2017 Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahana, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI...
Tag this Judgment!Bls International Services Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:11. 08.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:26. 10.2017 W.P.(C) 2844/2017, CM APPL.12383/2017 BLS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Parvinder Singh, Mr. Anant Raj Kanojia and Ms. Aakshi Lodha, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocates for Resp-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghvendra M. Bajaj and Mr. Sahil Sood, Advocates for Resp-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In this proceeding, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the relief claimed is for a direction to quash the award of tender to the second respondent (hereafter referred to as VFS) for outsourcing of visa support services by the Consulate General of W.P.(C)2844/2017 Page 1 of 16 Ind...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ram Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.rajesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~16 & 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL1602017 & CM No.6529 & 6531/2017 SHRI RAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1. + MAC APPEAL1672017 & CM No.6737 & 6739/2017 SHRI RAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus SANGEETA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of a common judgment of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (tribunal), rendered on 11th November, 2016 on the claim petitions ( MAC petition nos. 48/2016 and 30/2016) of the first and second respondents, (collectively, the MAC Appeal No.160/2017 & 167/2017 Page 1 of 3 claimants) seeking compensation on account of death of their children, daughter Naina, aged 14 years and son Vishal @ Badal, aged 12 year...
Tag this Judgment!Universal Sompo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.savitri & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 409/2016 & CM No.18410/2016 (stay) & CM No.18421/2016 UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus SAVITRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The deceased, Akash Tiwari, was a bachelor and a trained nuero therapist earning Rs. 20,000/- or more from private employment. The tribunal has awarded compensation on account of his death in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 23.12.2012 involving negligent driving of a bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-6949 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer), calculating the loss of dependency on the basis of income notionally assessed with the help of minimum wages. While the appeal has been filed by the insurer questioning the method of calculation of loss of dependency wherein personal and living exp...
Tag this Judgment!Sangita Devi vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1812/2017 Order reserved on:15th September,2017 Order pronounced on:26th October,2017 SANGITA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra with Mr. Vishal Kalra, Advocates STATE versus Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with Inspector Rajender Singh, Police Station Narela ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.0401/2017, under Section 498A/304B/34 of The Indian Penal Code,1860(hereinafter referred as IPC), registered by P.S. Narela, New-Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on receiving an information vide DD No.85/B that one Kanchan aged 26 years was brought to the SHRC Hospital on MLC No.3732/17, who was declared brought dead by the doctors. The deceased body was inspec...
Tag this Judgment!Damson Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes, Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + DAMSON TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. W.P.(C) 6583/2016 & CM No.26973/2016 Through: Mr. Raj K. Batra, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI AND ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notices for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and default assessment of penalty under Section 33 of the DVAT Act, dated 21st April 2016, are set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + ON QUEST MERCHANDISING INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 6093/2017 & CM ...
Tag this Judgment!Faqeer Mohammad vs.jamia Millia Islamia and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5846/2017 & C.M. 24420-21/2017 FAQEER MOHAMMAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Prashant Shekhar & Mr. Asif Ali Sidiqui, Advocates Versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Amit George & Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 Change of date of joining is the subject matter of this petition.... Petitioner has retired as Associate Professor on 31st December, 2016. An offer of appointment was made to petitioner to join respondent-University as Lecturer, Chemistry on 16th December, 2003 and on 23rd December, 2003, a formal letter of appointment was issued to him and petitioner had submitted his acceptance through proper channel on 24th December, 2003. Since there were winter vacations in the respondent-University, W.P.(C) 5846/2017 Page 1 of 6 therefore, petitioner had joined his duties on 6th January, 200...
Tag this Judgment!Leo Duct Engineers & Consultants Ltd. Vs.gail Gas Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 793/2016 & CM Nos3468/2016 & 19603/2016 LEO DUCT ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Makkar, Se. Advocate with Ms S. Mukherjee and Mr Mithun Rao, Advocates. versus GAIL GAS LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Ms Purnima Maheshwari and Mr Tushkar Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER2610.2017 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 08.06.2015, passed by GAIL Gas Limited ( hereafter 'GGL'), debarring the petitioner from participating in the bidding process for a period of three years. The petitioner further impugns the order dated 15.12.2015 passed by respondent no.2 (Appellate Authority) rejecting the petitioner's appeal against order dated 08.06.2015 passed by.2. The impugned order dated 08.06.2015 was passed on the principal basis that the petitioner had submitted incorrect bi...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ombati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :26. h October, 2017 + MAC APP. 191/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus OMBATI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Amit @ Bittoo, aged 38 years, died due to the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.03.2013 due to the negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.UP-17-6780 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company for the period in question. Two accident claim cases came to be filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), one (MACT972013) for and on behalf of the parents and the minor son, aged 11 years of the deceased, and the other (MACT1202013) by the wife of the deceased, adding the said son as co- petitioner. While in the first case the widow Meenu was shown in the array of respondents, in the second case, the parents were in...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Kumar Verma vs.kishore Kumar Arora
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2017. RC.REV. 384/2017 & CMs No.30392/2017 & 30394/2017 RAMESH KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitin Soni, Mr. Kewin Kunjappy and Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advs. Versus KISHORE KUMAR ARORA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 24th March, 2017 in E No.1(Regd. ID No.87/17) of the Court of Pilot Court (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application of the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from shop bearing No.1641-A in property No.1639-1648, Dariba Kalan, Chandni Chowk, Delhi.2. The petition came up first before...
Tag this Judgment!