Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 21 of about 590 results (0.012 seconds)Shri Ram Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Sangeeta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~16 & 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL1602017 & CM No.6529 & 6531/2017 SHRI RAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus RAJESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1. + MAC APPEAL1672017 & CM No.6737 & 6739/2017 SHRI RAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. versus SANGEETA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both these appeals arise out of a common judgment of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (tribunal), rendered on 11th November, 2016 on the claim petitions ( MAC petition nos. 48/2016 and 30/2016) of the first and second respondents, (collectively, the MAC Appeal No.160/2017 & 167/2017 Page 1 of 3 claimants) seeking compensation on account of death of their children, daughter Naina, aged 14 years and son Vishal @ Badal, aged 12 year...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak R Gayakward & Anr. Vs.parameshwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL4312010 DEEPAK R GAYAKWARD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus PARAMESHWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Mr. Arjun Gadhoke and Mr. Archit Arora, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 27.10.2005, Vijaya, aged about 50 years, earning her livelihood as a maid-servant in the locality described as Nirman Apartments, is stated to have suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that took place around 05.40 hours. It is stated that at that time, she was accompanied by her husband Parmeshwar (first respondent herein), both moving on a bicycle. Vijaya died due to the injuries suffered.2. As per the record, the first intimation about the accident was received in police station Mayur Vihar (vide DD No.6A dated 27.10.2005) at 07.30 hours from Jeevan Anmol Hospital where the victim had been take...
Tag this Judgment!Pankaj Nailwal and Anr. Vs.secretary General, Supreme Court of India
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 13, 2017 Judgment delivered on: October 25, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4797/2015 & CM. No.8671/2015 PANKAJ NAILWAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Adv. versus SECRETARY GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, (CGSC) Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. and Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-"a) Issue a writ of certiorari/Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or orders to call the records relating to selection process of Junior Court Assistant advertised vide Advertisement dated by the respondent & direct the Respondent to comply with terms of Advertisement while making appointment to post of Junior Court Assistant and/or b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent to consider the petitioner for ap...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1822/2017 Order reserved on 12th October, 2017 Order pronounced on 25th, October, 2017 VINOD KUMAR ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Raj Sehipal, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. .Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for seeking interim bail for a period of 30 days in case FIR No.225/2013 under section 302/323/2IPC registered at Police Station Samaipur Badli.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.05.2013 and out of 33 witnesses, all the material witnesses have been examined including the complainant PW-7 Jasbir Singh; that the family of the petitioner is facing severe financial crunch specially children (one daughter and one son), whose studies are being hampered due to non-deposit of fee; that vide order dated 10.07.2017 passed by this Court, the petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Ntpc Limited vs.jindal Itf Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~OS-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:22. 09.2017 Pronounced on:25. 10.2017 ARB. A. (COMM.) 28/2017 NTPC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Singh, Through Mr.Vikas Ms.Bani Ms.Srishti Mr.KapishSeth, Advs. Dikshit, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Nikita, and Banerjee JINDAL ITF LIMITED & ANR versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Manoj K.Singh, Ms.Gunita Pahwa and Mr.Raj Dutt Shekhar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This appeal is filed under section 37(2) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 15.7.2017 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as The AT) in exercise of powers under section 17 of the Act. The appellant entered into an MOU with respondent No.2/Inland Waterways Authority of India on 24.9.2008 pursuant to which it released a Request for Proposal dated 12.1.2011 for the selection of an operator for transportation of coal through wate...
Tag this Judgment!Inderjeet Dugal vs.gurdeep Singh
Court: Delhi
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 476/2017 INDERJEET DUGAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, Adv. Versus GURDEEP SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ..... Respondent % Caveat No.915/2017 ORDER2510.2017 1.2. None appears for the caveator/respondent. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.37981/2017 (for exemption) 3.4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RC.REV. 476/2017 & CM No.37982/2017 (for stay) 5. This petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 19th August, 2017 in E-272/2017, Unique ID No.313/2017 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from Garage No.70, Ground Floor, situated in premises No.70, ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sanjay Kumar Virmani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~357 & 358 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL5582011 Decided on:25. h October, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate versus SANJAY KUMAR VIRMANI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC APPEAL5792011 SANJAY KUMAR VIRMANI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: None versus GANGA SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 04.02.2008, Ravinder Singh @ Raman, a bachelor, aged 37 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident involving negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-4909 admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question MAC Aeal No.558/2011& 579/2011 Page 1 of 5 with National Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant in MACA5582011), and died in the consequence. Two of his brothers, they being appellants in MACA5792011 on their behalf and on behalf of their sisters, they being A...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Rakesh Jagmohan Pandey vs.m/s Jvg Finance Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:25. h October, 2017 + CO.A(SB) 66/2014 SH. RAKESH JAGMOHAN PANDEY ..... Appellant J.Bhambhani, Sr Advocate with Mr.Vijay M Chauhan, Advocate. Through : Mr.Anup versus M/S JVG FINANCE LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate for Official Liquidator. Ms.Swati Setia, Advocate Reserve Bank of India. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is against the notice dated 13.11.2014 of the Official Liquidator and against the report dated 22.08.2014 of the One Man Committee constituted by this Court.2. It is only on the basis of the report dated 22.08.2014 of the One Man Committee, the Official Liquidator had demanded the vacant possession of flat bearing No.402, Panchmukhi Apartment and another flat bearing No.502, Panchamarat Apartment, Off Yari Road, Versova (West), Andheri, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as flat Nos.402 and 502 respectively). The ...
Tag this Judgment!The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.nirmala Devi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.74/2017 + % THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. 25th October, 2017 Through: Mr. S.P.Jain with ..... Appellant Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advs. versus NIRMALA DEVI & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanobar Ali Qureshi & Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advs. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.5612/2017(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO No.74/2017 & CM No.5613/2017(stay) 1. This First Appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the insurance company impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 25.11.2016 by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner FAO No.74/2017 Page 1 of 11 has allowed the claim petition filed by the claimant/respondent no.1 herein and has awarded compensation under the Employees Compensation Act on account of death of the son of the c...
Tag this Judgment!Ishlamuddin & Ors. Vs.iffco Tokio Gen. Insurnace Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~R-362 & R-363 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.573/2011 IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INSURNACE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus ISHLAMUDDIN & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.746/2012 ISHLAMUDDIN & ORS. Through: None. versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INSURNACE CO. LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ishlamuddin (the claimant) had instituted accident claim case (MAC Petition No.70/2009) on 03.02.2009 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.12.2008 due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tata 709 bearing registration No.DL1C2827 admittedly insured MAC Appeal No.573/2011 -conn Page 1 of 6 against third party risk with IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer) for the peri...
Tag this Judgment!