Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir Kumar Tyagi and Ors vs.supreme Court of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 13, 2017 Judgment delivered on: October 25, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5571/2016 & CM. Nos. 23169/2016, 6998/2017 and 36913/2017 SUDHIR KUMAR TYAGI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. versus SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS AND + W.P.(C) 6346/2016 & CM No.17159/2017 Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, (CGSC) Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. and Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. SURUCHI RAWAT & ORS versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Adv., Mr. R.K. Seewal, Ms. Kiran Bairwa, Mr. Rupesh Aggarwal and Mr. G.C. Rawal, Advs. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, (CGSC) Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. and Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. W.P.(C) No.5571/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 As both these petitions involve identical issue(s) and facts, they are being decided by this common order.2. The fact...
Asad Mueed vs.bank of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :25. h OCTOBER, 2017 + CS(OS) 162/2017 & IA Nos.80(u/O1R-10 CPC), 4953/2017 (u/S151CPC), 57(u/S151CPC), 43(u/O39 R-1&2 CPC), 49[u/S2b) Cont.of Court Act]., 58(u/O39R-2A) and 7874/2017 (u/S151CPC), 78(u/S151CPC), 95(u/O39R-2), 95(u/O39R-2 and 2A CPC) ASAD MUEED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Simran Mehta, Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr.Rishabh Kapur and Ms.Jyoti Sagar, Advocates. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Shreyans Singhvi and Ms.Ekta Mehta, Advocates for applicant versus BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Kailash Vasdev, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bobby Lao, Advocate for D-2. Mr.Arvind K.Nigam, Sr.Advocate wtih Mr.Satinder S.Bawa and Mr.Mikhil Sharda, Advocates for D-3. Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pawan Upadhyay, Mr.Rajesh Chhetri, Mr.Saravjeet Pratap Singh and Ms.Krishna Kanodia, Advocates for D-4. CS(OS) 162/2017 & connected matters. Page 1 o...
Shiv Kumar Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 79/2013 SHIV KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vijay Kasana with Mr. Sudhir Naagar and Ms. Chetna Singh, Advocates STATE versus % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Through None Date of Decision:25. h October, 2017 ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed for grant of Letters of Administration under Sections 218 and 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 with respect to the estate of deceased Smt. Sita Rani Verma.2. It is stated that Smt. Sita Rani Verma, wife of Late Ajay Prakash Verma and mother of petitioner no.1, i.e. Shiv Kumar Verma, expired on 18th November, 2001, leaving behind the following two legal heirs: a. Ajay Prakash Verma (Husband) b. Shiv Kumar Verma (Son) TEST.CAS. 79/2013 Page 1 of 3 3. It is averred in the petition that during her lifetime the deceased was ordinarily residing and had permanent abode with the petitioner. The deceased is stated to have purch...
Vijay @ Bittu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 25, 2017 CRL.A. 19/2011 VIJAY @ BITTU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate (DHCLSC). versus STATE Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ..... Respondent PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) for the State.1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant Vijay @ Bittu assailing the judgment and order on sentence 14th May, 2010 and 17th May, 2010 respectively whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine of 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for one year.2. Briefly stating, the case of prosecution is that on 25th May, 2007 on receipt of DD No.25A regarding rape of a girl, W/ASI Sushila reached the spot where ASI Karan Singh, Ct.Suresh and W/Ct.Sharmila were already present. W/ASI Sushila recorded the statement Ex.PW2/A of Smt.Padma mother of the child victim P (name withheld to concea...
Ninder Kaur & Ors vs.tata Aig Gen Ins. Co. Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 184/2017 and CM77012017 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus + MAC.APP. 824/2017 NINDER KAUR & ORS Through: None NINDER KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants versus Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) TATA AIG GEN INS. CO. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate 1. Ranjeet Singh, a bachelor, then aged 25 years, died due to the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 24.09.2012 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as a truck bearing registration no.HR-63B-2895, admittedly insured against third party risk with Tata AIG General Insurance company MACA Nos.184/2017 & 824/2017 Page 1 of 6 Ltd. (insurer). On the accident claim case (old suit no.777/2012, new MACT case no.476944/16) instituted on 31.10.2012 by the firs...
Iffco Tokio Gen. Insurnace Co. Ltd. Vs.ishlamuddin & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
$~R-362 & R-363 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.573/2011 IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INSURNACE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus ISHLAMUDDIN & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.746/2012 ISHLAMUDDIN & ORS. Through: None. versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INSURNACE CO. LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ishlamuddin (the claimant) had instituted accident claim case (MAC Petition No.70/2009) on 03.02.2009 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.12.2008 due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tata 709 bearing registration No.DL1C2827 admittedly insured MAC Appeal No.573/2011 -conn Page 1 of 6 against third party risk with IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer) for the peri...
Libas Investments Private Limited vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 11736/2016 & CM Nos.46180/2016, 7913/2017, Date of Decision:25. 10.2017 14809/2017 & 20476/2017 LIBAS INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta with Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Pranjal Saran, Advs. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent versus Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, North DMC with Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar and Ms. Anushruti, Advs. for North DMC. Mr. Nimish Chib, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner challenges the rejection of its bid, for allotment of parking sites, by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC). The petitioners were not allowed to participate in the e- auction on account of denial of access by the respondent NDMC. W.P.(C) No.11736/2016 Page 1 2. The NDMC was of the opinion that the petitioners bid could not be considered on account of a ...
Sh. Hammad Ahmed vs.sh. Abdul Majeed & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :25. h OCTOBER, 2017 + CS(OS) 162/2017 & IA Nos.80(u/O1R-10 CPC), 4953/2017 (u/S151CPC), 57(u/S151CPC), 43(u/O39 R-1&2 CPC), 49[u/S2b) Cont.of Court Act]., 58(u/O39R-2A) and 7874/2017 (u/S151CPC), 78(u/S151CPC), 95(u/O39R-2), 95(u/O39R-2 and 2A CPC) ASAD MUEED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Simran Mehta, Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr.Rishabh Kapur and Ms.Jyoti Sagar, Advocates. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Shreyans Singhvi and Ms.Ekta Mehta, Advocates for applicant versus BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Kailash Vasdev, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Bobby Lao, Advocate for D-2. Mr.Arvind K.Nigam, Sr.Advocate wtih Mr.Satinder S.Bawa and Mr.Mikhil Sharda, Advocates for D-3. Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pawan Upadhyay, Mr.Rajesh Chhetri, Mr.Saravjeet Pratap Singh and Ms.Krishna Kanodia, Advocates for D-4. CS(OS) 162/2017 & connected matters. Page 1 o...
Capital Land Builder (P) Ltd. Vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 25, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 8561/2015, CM No.18494/2015 CAPITAL LAND BUILDER (P) LTD. Through: Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with ..... Respondent Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC Mr. Arjun Garg, Adv. with Ms. Sunanda Tulsyan, Adv. for Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Rule DB.2. With the consent of the parties, the petition is setting down for final hearing and disposed of.3. The petitioner seeks a direction that the entire acquisition proceedings in respect of land of the petitioner being comprised in khasra No.835 and 837 measuring 1 bighas 2 biswas, situated in the Revenue Estate of village Chattarpur, Delhi including notification bearing No.9(16)/80/L&B dated November 25, 1980 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 18...
Naresh Kumar Kapur vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2765/2014 NARESH KUMAR KAPUR Date of decision: October 25, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Not present. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: Wherefore it is prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to issue: (a) a writ or an order in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent Bank to make payment of Dearness Allowance to the petitioner on quarterly basis along with interest on delayed payment of Dearness Allowance being made to the petitioner on half yearly basis rather on quarterly basis in the light of Serial No.2 of Appendix II of Regulation 37 of Syndicate Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995 as amended up to date and on the basis of which Respondent Bank allowed pension benefi...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »