Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagwati vs.allahabad Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 24, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3943/2016 JAGWATI Through: Mr. Umesh Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus ALLAHABAD BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam & Mr.Aakash Sehrawat, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This is second round of litigation. In the first round of litigation, vide order of 6th November, 2015, this Court had directed the respondent- Bank to decide representation of petitioners husband. It stands decided vide impugned order of 4th December, 2015.... Petitioners husband was employed as a Head Cashier with respondent-Bank and was put under suspension in July, 2009 and during the period of his suspension, his entry into the bank premises was restricted only for the purpose of operating his bank account and collecting his dues. Vide order of 1st September, 2011, petitioners suspension was revoked and upon joining his duties, he came to know about second option to...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sita Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.428/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manu Shahalia, Adv. versus SITA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The insurance company by this appeal assails judgment dated 14.03.2016 of the tribunal whereby the accident claim case (suit No.125/13) of first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) was decided and compensation in the total sum of Rs. 13,73,205.20 was awarded with interest @ 9% per annum due to death of Lal Bahadur, aged 40 years, then earning his livelihood as a mason, in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 10.02.2013 due to negligent driving of rural transport vehicle bearing registration No.DL1A9035(RTV) which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question. The challenge is to the ...
Sachin Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA172017 SACHIN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through Appellant in person Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr. Junaid Nahvi and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates for respondents No.2 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER2410.2017 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Appeal assails the judgment dated 09.09.2016, rendered by a learned Single Judge of this court in WP(C) No.2732/2016 titled as Sachin Kumar vs. UOI & Ors., whereby the said petition was rejected as being devoid of merit.2. This is admittedly the second round of litigation between the parties based on the same subject matter.3. On 09.01.2012, the appellant/Sachin Kumar tendered his resignation as Deputy Manager (Kuwait) to respondent No.2/ Telecommunication Consultants India Limited (hereinafter referred to as TCIL), with immediate ...
Kajal Sarkar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:15. 09.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:24. 10.2017 W.P (CRL.) 1999/2017 KAJAL SARKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta & Mr.Sanjiv Joshi, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate with SI Varun, PS Hauz Khas, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.690/2016, registered against him on 06.11.2016 with Police Station Hauz Khas, South Delhi, Delhi, under Section 307 of the IPC and Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The respondent no.2 and respondent no.3 while studying in a college at Guwahati fell in love with each other in the year W.P. (Crl.) 1999/...
Raj Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:24. h October, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.1910/2015 RAJ SINGH Through Mr. Ankit Jain with Mr. Sarvesh Rai, ........ Petitioner versus Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC. Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocate for Mr. Madan Lal Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner claims to be 1/6th owner of the land situated in Khasra Nos.116(2(3-10), 24 (4-16), 25(4-04), 126/(3-10), 4(4-16), 5(4-16), 8(4-16), (2-16), 12(4-12), 13(4- 12), 14(4-12), 16(4-16), 17(4-16), 18(4-16), 19(4-16), 20(4-16), 1(4-16), 22(4-16), 23(4-16), 24/1(3-16), 25/1(3-08), 127/16(4- 16), 17/2(3-16), 24(4-16) 25 (4-16), 14(4-12), 5(4-12), 6(4-16), 7(4-16), 155/(3-03), 2(4-08), 3(4-05) & ...
Inder Kumar Jha & Anr vs.national Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1034/2016 and CM452912016 & 22943/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arihant Jain for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus INDER KUMAR JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Prashant Kumar for Mr. M.M. Singh, Adv. for R-3 & 4 + MAC.APP. 571/2017 INDER KUMAR JHA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arihant Jain for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MACA NOs.10& 571/2017 Page 1 of 6 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Pinki Jha, an unmarried girl, aged 19 years, then pursuing the course leading to the degree of Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) in the first year, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.10.2014 and died in the consequence. Her parents (appellants in MACA5712017) inst...
Upsrtc vs.manju Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~R-350 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL5192011 UPSRTC ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. versus MANJU YADAV & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 01.11.2008, the motor vehicular accident took place involving collision between two vehicles one being Maruti Van bearing registration No.DL-3C-AW-0291 (van) and the other bus bearing registration No.UP-15-Z-9773 (bus). The collision resulted in Sanjay Yadav, driving the van, suffering injuries that proved fatal. The bus admittedly belonged to the appellant and driven by its driver Imamuddin at the relevant point of time. The first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (suit No.609/2008) on 21.11.2008 seeking compensation on the grounds that the accident had occurred due to the negligent driving of the bus by the said Imamuddin. During the inquiry before the tribunal, ...
Raj Kumar Sethi & Anr. Vs.janki Devi @ Usha Kiran
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.339/2000 + % RAJ KUMAR SETHI & ANR. Reserved on:9. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:24. h October, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Rashmi Verma and Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocates. versus JANKI DEVI @ USHA KIRAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit challenging the impugned judgment dated 9.3.2000 passed by the trial court dismissing the suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellants/plaintiffs with respect to the suit property. The suit property is 1157 sq. yards of land situated in Khasra Nos. 201 and 1274/191 in RFA No.339/2000 Page 1 of 23 Village Kilokari, Delhi and known as Plot Nos. 51, 51A and 51B, Block-A, Friends Colony, Delhi...
Icici Lombard Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd vs.laxmi Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.383/2008 ICICI LOMBARD GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD ... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus LAXMI DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for claimants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The insurance company is aggrieved with the direction passed in the judgment dated 17th May, 2008 of the motor accident claims tribunal in the accident claim case (suit No.287/2006) instituted on 20th May, 2006 by the first respondent, whereby compensation in the sum of Rs. 4,94,700/- was awarded and liability was fastened against it to pay with interest to the claimant who also represents the interest of third and fourth respondents on account of death of Sandeep Sharma in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 15.03.2006 while riding motorcycle bearing registration No.DL7 AH7582(the motorcycle), the appellant being the insurer against third party ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.geeta Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 37/2016 and CM15082016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus GEETA SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma, Adv. for R-1 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (suit no.569/2014) instituted on 27.08.2014 by the first to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 28.11.2015, awarded total compensation in the sum of Rs.37,67,000/- on account of death of Shiv Ratan Sharma in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 19.06.2014 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as one bearing registration no.DL-1LG-7001 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company (insurer) for the period in question. The said amount included Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of consortium...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »