Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 16 of about 590 results (0.016 seconds)Medical Council of India vs.dr Anil Grover & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: October 09, 2017 Pronounced on: October 27, 2017 LPA5772017& CMs 31824-MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr.T. Singh Dev, Ms. Biakthansangi, Mr. Tarun Verma and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates versus DR ANIL GROVER &ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Bina Madhavan and Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi, Advocate for respondent-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 The first respondent (hereafter the doctor) is a Professor of Cardiology who was debarred from undertaking any post of an administrative nature/teaching post of similar nature in any university and/or a medical college for a period of five years because the Ethics Committee of the appellant-Medical Council of India (hereinafter referred to as MCI) found that he was working in more than one medi...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.madhu & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~20 & R-323 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 349/2011 & CM No.7819/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus MADHU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent (the claimant) had instituted accident case (suit No.125/10/09) on 03.11.2009 seeking compensation for injuries suffered in motor vehicular accident that had occurred, on 16.09.2009 at about 8:30 p.m. statedly due to the negligence on the part of the driver of bus bearing registration No.DL1A7988admittedly insured against the third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (the insurer). Besides the insurer (the appellant), the driver and the owner respectively of the bus were impleaded as parties to the accident claim case, they being second and third respondents in the appeal. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 13.01.2011, accepted...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Anita Jain vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5597/2017 DR. ANITA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhur Jain, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, CGSC. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2710.2017 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by judgment dated 31.05.2017 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing her original application for issuing directions to the respondent No.1/Union of India to consider appointing her to the post of Director, CGHS with all consequential benefits.2. The case of the petitioner as set up before the Tribunal was that she is posted as an Additional Medical Superintendent, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi and entitled for being appointed to the post of Director, CGHS, on adoption of the criteria of seniority cum suitability but the competent authority has failed to apply the said criteria and instead, appointed respondent No.2 to the subj...
Tag this Judgment!Priyam Batra (Deceased) Through Lrs vs.navketan Cooperative Group Hous ...
Court: Delhi
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1185/2017 PRIYAM BATRA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan S. Thukral, Mr. Rohit Yadav and Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAVKETAN COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD & ANR Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER2710.2017 % CM No.38384/2017 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1185/2017 & CMs No.38382/2017 (for stay) & 38383/2017 (for condonation of 84 days delay in filing) 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 3rd May, 2017 in CS No.7703/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-03 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi]. to the extent the same allows the application of the respondent/defendant No.2 Ram Milan Dubey under Order XVIII Rule 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). CM(M) 1185/2017 Page 1 of 8 4. The petitioner/plaintiff has i...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar Dhall vs.dharampal Dhall and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 27, 2017 RFA4002010 VINOD KUMAR DHALL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.K.R.Chawla, Mr.Harsh Kumar, Advocates. versus DHARAMPAL DHALL AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Mr.Vidit Gupta, Mr.Prakash Pandey, Advocates for LRs of R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 01.05.2010 passed 1. by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit for recovery, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff has been decreed in his favour, the appellant/defendant No.1 has filed the present appeal. RFA400/2010 Page 1of 12 registered on plaintiff/respondent No.1 The facts narrated in the plaint filed before the Court below are 2. that a suit was filed before the Trial Court by respondent No.1/plaintiff for recovery, possess...
Tag this Judgment!Manjeet Kumar vs.north Delhi Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 27, 2017 RFA402009 MANJEET KUMAR Through: Mr. V.K. Goel, Advocate ..... Appellant versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J Through: Mr.Manish Srivastava, Mr. Shagun Trisal, Advocates ..... Respondent 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.5/2006, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 96 of CPC. 33200475344, 33205012639 In nutshell, the facts of being K.Nos. the case are that three electric 2. connections and 33200137295 were installed at B-223, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase I, New Delhi and were sanctioned for industrial purpose in the name of the appellant herein. The appellant paid the bills received against all the aforesaid connection numbers. On 07.02.2005, all the three connections got amalgamated and consequently an HT connection of 225 KW with K.No.331...
Tag this Judgment!Deveshwari Devi & Anr. Vs.akram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-379 & 380 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL7512011 & CM157042011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus DEVESHWARI DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R- 1 & 2 + MAC APPEAL712012 DEVESHWARI DEVI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus AKRAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vishwambar Pd. Joshi, a bachelor, aged 24 years, employed with Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. as Assistant Supervisor, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 30.05.2008 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-9169 and died in the consequence. His parents, appellants in MACA7112 MACA7512011 & 71/2012 Page 1 of 5 (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (MACT123608) on 30.07.2008 seeking compensation im...
Tag this Judgment!Anita Devi & Ors. Vs.yudhvir Sigh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1063/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENENRAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Adv. versus ANITA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannnie, Adv. for R-1 to 6. + MAC APPEAL No.205/2017 ANITA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. versus YUDHVIR SIGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Pankaj Kumar Mishra was running across the road on 1. 16.04.2015 at about 1.30 p.m. when he was hit by car bearing registration No.HR26 8712 and died due to the injuries consequently suffered. On the accident claim filed by his wife and MAC Appeal No.1063/2016 -conn Page 1 of 4 other members of the family dependent on him, they being appellants in MAC Appeal No.205/2017 instituted accident claim case (MACP No.86/16) on 05.10.2015.2. The motor accident claims tribunal held inquiry and...
Tag this Judgment!Javed Ali vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1639/2017 Order reserved on 09th October, 2017 Order pronounced on 26th October, 2017 JAVED ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State ..Respondent with SI Anurag, PS Mehrauli. for Mr. O.P. Panwar, Advocate complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this present application filed under Section 438 Cr.PC, the petitioner is seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.315/2017 under Sections 420/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) registered at Police Station Mehrauli.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/accused entered into a collaboration agreement with one Mr. Narender Singh according to which it was decided that upon completion of the construction both the parties shall own equal proportion of flats in the building. Another co-accused Pooja Duggal who runs...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Meenu Trading Co. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes, Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6804/2017 M/S MEENU TRADING CO. Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI AND ANR. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR % ORDER2610.2017 The present petition has been disposed of by a common judgement passed today in W.P.(C) 6093/2017 and batch. Consequently, the notice for default assessment of tax and interest under Section 32 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, dated 17th July 2017, is set aside. A copy of the said judgment is placed below. OCTOBER26 2017 Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J.CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h September, 2017 Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + ON QUEST MERCHANDISING INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 6093/2017 & CM No.25293/2017 Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahana, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDEN...
Tag this Judgment!