Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Chand Verma and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...
M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Sharma Prasad and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...
Ms. Lalita Vs. North Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2970/2015 & C.M.No.5313/2015 (Stay) 27th March, 2015 % MS. LALITA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.M.Rais Farooqui, Advocate. versus NORTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pratap Singh, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner in this case seeks appointment as an Assistant Teacher (Primary) with the respondent no.2/School, however, admittedly petitioner does not have the qualification of Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) which is required for being appointed as a Primary Teacher in the School.2. I have considered this aspect in the judgment in the case of Ruchika Arora & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. in W.P.(C) No.2544/2013 decided on 22.4.2013, and in which judgment I have held that if a person does not have CTET qualification which is required by virtue of notification issued under the Right of Chi...
Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co Ltd Vs. Yograj Infrastructur ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:27. h March, 2015 % + E.A. (OS) No.169/2013 in Ex.P. No.322/2012 SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD ..... Decree Holder Through Mr.Navin Kumar, Adv. with Ms.Rashmeet Kaur, Adv. versus YOGRAJ INFRASTRUCTURE LTD ..... Judgment Debtor Through Mr.Dinesh Agnani, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Khattar and Mr.Faisal Zafar, Advs. for JD. Mr.V.Sudeer, Adv. for Objector/ Syndicate Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The decree holder has filed the present execution petition under Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for enforcement of the partial award dated 30th June, 2011 and the final award dated 24th August, 2012 against the judgment debtor passed by the Arbitral Tribunal duly appointed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) as per terms agreed between the parties. As per the SIAC Rules, all partial awards and final aw...
Santosh Dhiraj Pathak Vs. Technology Development Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 27, 2015 Crl. M.C. No.1258/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Through None + ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1259/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Through None + ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1260/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Through None + ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1261/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Through None + ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1262/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Through None + ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1264/2015 SANTOSH DHIRAJ PATHAK ..... Petitioner Through Mr.L.M.Grover, Adv. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Thr...
Sunil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. h March, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. No.2444/2014 TEJINDER PAL KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Devender Kaushik, PS I.P. Estate, in person. + BAIL APPLN. No.332/2015 SUNIL KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Devender Kaushik, PS I.P. Estate, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide two anticipatory bail applications, filed by Tejinder Pal Kaur and Sunil Kumar, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest/anticipatory bail with directions to the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer in case FIR No.377/2014, under Sections 420/468/471 IPC, P.S. I.P. Estate (Central District), New Delhi to release the petitioners in the event of thei...
Tejinder Pal Kaur Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:27. h March, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. No.2444/2014 TEJINDER PAL KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Devender Kaushik, PS I.P. Estate, in person. + BAIL APPLN. No.332/2015 SUNIL KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Devender Kaushik, PS I.P. Estate, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide two anticipatory bail applications, filed by Tejinder Pal Kaur and Sunil Kumar, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest/anticipatory bail with directions to the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer in case FIR No.377/2014, under Sections 420/468/471 IPC, P.S. I.P. Estate (Central District), New Delhi to release the petitioners in the event of thei...
Nirmala Jain and Anr. Vs. G.S.Batra and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on March 10, 2015 Judgment delivered on March 27, 2015 + IA191372014 in OMP No.145/2004 NIRMALA JAIN & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajat Navet, Advocate versus G.S.BATRA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Malhotra, Adv. for R1 Ms.Shweta Priyadarshani, Advocate for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.IA191372014 in OMP No.145/2004 (filed by the respondent No.1) 1. By the present order, I will dispose of the application i.e. IA191372014 filed by the respondent No.1/applicant (Applicant, in short) Mr. G.S.Batra in the aforesaid OMP. The facts:2. The aforesaid OMP has been filed by the petitioners herein under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, in short). When the matter was listed on May 4, 2004, this Court has passed the following order:Notice to the respondents for 14th July, 2004. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to maintain status quo in re...
Aroon Purie Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on November 21, 2014 Judgment Delivered on March 27, 2015 + ITA2322002 AROON PURIE Through versus ..... Appellant Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through ..... Respondent Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short) has been filed by the assessee challenging the order dated 08.04.2002 in ITA No.531/Delhi/1995, whereby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal for short) has set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and affirmed the finding of the assessing officer that Rs.1 lakh received by the assessee from B. D. Goenka Foundation is income so as to be taxable. The year of assessment with which we are concerned in this appeal is 1991-92.2. The following substantial questions of law...
Madhur Kishore Bhatnagar Vs. The State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:26. h February, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:27. h March, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 25/2007 MADHUR KISHORE BHATNAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B.P. Aggarwal & Ms. Shalini Aggarwal, Advocates versus THE STATE THR. CBI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 18.03.2005 and order on sentence dated 22.03.2005 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.3,000/- for offence under Section 193 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month; to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.3,000/- under Section 469 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month; to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »