Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Uoi Through Ministry of Urban Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2345/2014 & CM No.5406/2015 (of the Amicus Curiae for directions). COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. versus UOI THROUGH MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan with Ms. Nitya Sharma, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel PWD & GNCTD. Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel and Ms. Divya Jain, Adv. for NDMC. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel, DDA. Mr. Ajay Arora, Adv. for MCD. Mr. Daleep Kumar Dhyani and Mr. Rahul Arya, Advs. for applicant (Peoples action through its executive member). Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Adv. for Delhi Cantonment Board. Mr. Balendu Shekhar & Mr. Vivek Jaiswal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 25.03.2015 1. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta (Amicus Curiae) has handed over in Court in a sealed envelope copies of the letter dated 5th Febr...
Radhey Shyam Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1217/2015 RADHEY SHYAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jaidev Verma, Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sumit Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.815/2014, under Sections 308/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Bawana, Delhi is sought while relying upon Judgment of 9th February, 2015 vide which the FIR in question has been quashed qua co-accused of petitioner and also on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 in support of this petition cofirming amicable settlement between the parties. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so ...
Trimurti Exports and Ors. Vs. Modelama Exports Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4105/2014 & Crl.M.As.14090/14, 14542/14 TRIMURTI EXPORTS & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh, Ms. Swati Goswami and Mr. Shubham Agarwal, Advocates versus MODELAMA EXPORTS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Amritansh Batheja, Mr. Milan Malhotra and Mr. Kunal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % Vide impugned order of 27th July, 2012, petitioner No.1 through its three partners has been summoned as accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by respondentcomplainant. Vide order of 22nd April, 2013 petitioners application for transfer of complaint case in question to the court of competent territorial jurisdiction stands rejected by trial court while observing that the question of jurisdiction was urged by petitioners before this Court, but the...
Gopal Krishan Bhasin Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:25. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 3003/2015 GOPAL KRISHAN BHASIN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vinny Shangloo, Adv. versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Kakra and Mr. Bheem, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) C.M. No.5384/2015 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3003/2015 & C.M. No.5385/2015 (stay) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjeev Kakra, Advocate accepts notice. With consent, the petition was heard finally.2. The petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is aggrieved by an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 27.05.2014 made in two applications filed by the respondent (hereafter referred to as the Bank), i.e., OA592005 and OA792005.3. The DRT had for the same reasons, dismissed the petitioners W.P.(C) 3003/2015 Page 1 Sec...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Anil Patel and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 974/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate with Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate versus ANIL PATEL & ORS Through: ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of Rs.17,02,588/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondent no.1 who suffered grievous injuries resulting in amputation of right leg below knee in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 22.11.2008.2. The compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is tabulated hereunder: Sl. Compensation under various Heads No.1. Medical Bills and Expenses 2. Future Medical Expenses 3. Special Diet 20,000/- 4. Conveyance Charges 25,000/- 5. Loss of Income 23,076/- 6. Future Loss of Income 7. Loss of Amenities Enjoyment of Life 8. Pain, Suffering and Trauma TOTAL3 A...
Niagara Hotels and Builders (P) Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: March 25,2015 + ITA432014 NIAGARA HOTELS & BUILDERS (P) LTD .Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kavita Jha and Ms. Shraddha, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. B. Chakraborty and Mr. Mukul Mathur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred by the assessee questioning the correctness of the view taken by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the ITAT) in its order dated 30.04.2012 deciding ITA No.901/Del/2012 and rejecting the contention of the appellant that the income claimed as rent from space antenna in respect of the top terrace of property described as Vikram Tower, 16, Rajendra Place, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the property), in th...
Royal Safe Company (Kb) Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:24. h March, 2015 W.P.(C) No.7498/2014 & CM No.17749/2014 (for stay) DELITE HI-TECH FURNITURE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Archit Vasudev, Mr. Prayas Aneja and Mr. Puneet Relan, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Surekha Raman and Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advs. for R-3. + AND W.P.(C) No.7506/2014 & CM No.17760/2014 (for stay) DELITE KOM LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Archit Vasudev, Mr. Prayas Aneja and Mr. Puneet Relan, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Surekha Raman and Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advs. for R-3. + AND W.P.(C) No.7510/2014 & CM No.17766/2014 (for stay) ROYAL SAFE COMPANY (KB) ..... Petitione...
Kansal Woolen and Hosiery Vs. Dr Usha Singh and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RC.REV. 98/2015 Reserved on:2. d March, 2015 Decided on:24. h March, 2015 KANSAL WOOLEN AND HOSIERY MILLS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. AbhinavVasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naveen Kr. Chaudhary, Adv. versus DR USHA SINGH AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gursharan Singh, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 19th September, 2014 the petitioner prefers the present petition whereby his leave to defend application in an eviction petition filed by the respondents under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act) was dismissed.2. In the eviction petition the respondents stated that the erstwhile owner of plot bearing No.A-8/11, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi was Smt. Raj Rani who left behind the two daughters i.e. respondent No.1 and Smt. Kamlesh Bajaj. The ground floor and one room on the first floor of the said pl...
State Vs. Balbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2015
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1335/2014 Judgment reserved on 13th March, 2015 Judgment pronounced on 24th March, 2015 % STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State. versus BALBIR SINGH Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Dua, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J1 Present appeal has been filed by the appellant/State against the judgment dated 19.10.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (Central), Delhi, whereby the respondent has been acquitted by the learned trial court for the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Before the rival submissions of counsel for the parties can be considered, we deem it appropriate to notice the case of the prosecution, as noticed by the learned trial court in the judgment dated 19.10.2013. Relevant portion of the trial court judgment reads as under:1. Vide DD No.2-A dated 26.7.2010, the police was informed by...
Gurbachan Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h March, 2015 % + LPA No.702/2014 GURBACHAN SINGH Through: .... Appellant Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Bahri, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for R-1 to 3 along with Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Asstt. Director, Enforcement Directorate. AND + W.P.(C) No.8210/2003 GURBACHAN SINGH Through: .... Petitioner Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Bahri, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikram Jetly, Adv. for R-1 to 3 along with Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Asstt. Director, Enforcement Directorate. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 15th May, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of the applications, being CM Nos.17965/2012 and 15521/2013 filed for restoration of the W.P.(C) No.8210/2003 (filed by the appellant) dismissed in default ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »