Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pawan Kumar Vs. Paramjit Singh Gill
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 50/2015 & CM16362015 (stay) Reserved on:13. h March, 2015 Decided on:25. h March, 2015 % PAWAN KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Keshav Dayal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sheetal Mishra and Ms. Saumitri Pradhan, Advs. versus PARAMJIT SINGH GILL Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal with Mr. Sushil Thakur, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 26th September, 2014 dismissing the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner in an eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. In the eviction petition, the respondent stated that the tenanted premises was a shop on the ground floor in suit property bearing No.C-145, Hari Nagar, Clock Tower, Main Market. The suit property was purchased by the father of the respondent who executed a Will in favour of the respon...
Sangeeta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 19, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: March 25, 2015 + W.P.(C) 7606/2012 SANGEETA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mrs.Rekha Palli, Mrs.Punam Singh and & Ms.Shruti Munjal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vikas Mahajan, CGSC for UOI/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated December 01, 2011 whereby the Disciplinary Authority imposed a penalty of compulsory retirement on the petitioner against which the appeal preferred was dismissed and against which order the revision filed was dismissed on December 27, 2011, the writ petition has been filed praying that the orders be quashed and the petitioner be reinstated in service after imposing such penalty as may be found proportionate to the wrong committed by the petitioner. In other words, the proportionality of the penalty has been questioned...
Ms. Priti Sharma Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7825/2014 & CM No.18373/2014 25th March, 2015 % MS. PRITI SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Ms. Divya Aggarwal, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nikita Khetrapal, Adv. for Ms. Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-1 to 3 and Ms. Jalaj Kumari, Zone as DEO. Ms. Rekha Aggarwal, Adv. for R-4 and 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner who was employed originally with the DAV Sec. School at Baird Road Branch New Delhi, and thereafter subsequently adjusted with the Vidya Bhawan Mahavidyalaya, Lodhi Estate New Delhi in terms of the office order dated 5.3.2011 of the Director of Education/respondent no.3, impugns the order passed by the Lieutenant Governor dated 20.3.2014 by which the Lieutenant Governor has recalled and cancelled...
Amar Pal Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH12 2015 DECIDED ON : MARCH25 2015 + CRL.A. 803/2005 & Crl.M.A.10115/2005 AMAR PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Raj Pal Singh with Mr.Sauraj Singh and Ms.Meenakshi, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present appeal is directed against a judgment dated 11.08.2005 in Sessions Case No.10/05 arising out of FIR No.582/99 registered at Police Station Timarpur by which the appellant-Amar Pal Singh was convicted under Section 452/376/506-II IPC. By an order dated 20.08.2005 he was sentenced to undergo RI for two years with fine `1,000/- under Section 452 IPC; RI for ten years with fine `1,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for two years with fine `1,000/- under Section 506-II IPC. The substantive sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as projected in the charge- sheet was that on 01.12.99 at about 2:...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Bumi Hiway (M) Sdn Bhd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 249/2013 Reserved on: March 3, 2015 Decision on: March 25 2015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor with Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocates. versus BUMI HIWAY (M) SDN BHD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D. Moitra, Advocate. AND O.M.P. 274/2013 BUMI HIWAY (M) SDN BHD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Moitra, Advocate. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor with Mr. Anil Kumar and Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2503.2015 1. Both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) raise limited challenge to an Award dated 4th December 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the parties i.e. the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and Bhumi Hiway (M) SDN BHD ('BHSB') arising out of a contract agreement dated 14th June 2001 for the Four-Laning of ...
Yusuf Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$ 4. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:25. 03.2015 CRL. APPEAL No.488/2009 YUSUF Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate with Ms. Karuna Chhatwal, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.02.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.161/06 arising out of FIR No.162/03, PS New Usmanpur, under Sections 392/394/397/34 IPC. By the impugned judgment, the appellant Yusuf and the co-accused Arif were held guilty and convicted for offences punishable under Sections 452, 392, 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appellant also assails the order on sentence dated 19.02.2008, whereby the appellant was sentenced to undergo three years RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- for offence punishable under Section 452 IPC. In ...
Rajeev Saroha and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1209/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.4437/2015 RAJEEV SAROHA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pujya Kumar Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR . Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Narender Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.299/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 18th March, 2014, arrived at Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by SI Narender on the basis of identity proof produ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1779/2014 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Begum, Adv. for Ms. Zubeda GNCTD. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 25.03.2015 1. This petition in public interest was registered on receipt of letter dated 16th June, 2014 from the Special Judge, CBI-IX (P.C. Act), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi acting as Inspecting Judge, Jail No.5, flagging the issue of inordinate delay in verification of sureties. It was informed that the release of prisoners who had been ordered to be released on bail was being unduly delayed owing to the process of verification of sureties being very slow. It has been suggested by the learned Judge that some steps be taken at the level of D.G. (Prisons) to not only standardize the process of verifications of sureties but to also create some agency / cel...
Jerry Samson and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1206/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.4430/2015 JERRY SAMSON & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Suredner Sheoram, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Rajeveer Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.157/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Crime Against Women Cell, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 19th April, 2015, arrived at The Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Rajveer Singh on the basis of identity Crl.M.C.No.1206/2015 ...
Paardarshita Public Welfare Foundation (Ngo) Vs. Union of India and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2015
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8957/2014 PAARDARSHITA PUBLIC WELFARE FOUNDATION (NGO) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harkrishan Das Nijhawan, Secretary of petitioner appearing in person. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CSGC with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Akash Nagar, Advs. for R-1&2. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R3/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 25.03.2015 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed in public interest with respect to the practice stated to be prevalent of, the Delhi Police registering with itself arms licences of All India validity got issued by the residents of Delhi from the North Eastern States, without even verifying the arms licence had in fact been issued by the North Eastern States or not. It was pleaded that the Secretary of the petitioner through the medium of Right to Information Act, 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »