Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 24 2015

Irfan Badshah and Anr. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-24-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1365/2014 Judgment dated March 24th , 2015 % IRFAN BADSHAH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Abhishek Singh and Mr.Amit Bhalla, Advocates versus STATE Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 16.4.2014 and order on sentence dated 21.4.2014, by which appellants have been convicted under Sections 302/323/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC; and also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the offence punishable under Sections 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and in default thereof further simple imprisonment for two m...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Ajai Saxena Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 23, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4706/2013 AJAI SAXENA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate with Ms.Ankita Patnaik and Ms.Garima Sachdeva, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ajay Digpaul, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner joined the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) as an Assistant Commandant on March 26, 1998. He was promoted as the Deputy Commandant on May 09, 2005 and thereafter as a Second-in-Command in December 2009.2. The appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Commandant was delayed for reasons not attributable to him and as a result persons junior to him in the merit list were offered appointment in August, 1997 and the petitioner was offered appointment in March, 1998. However, this did not create any problem for the petitioner because in the seniority list drawn up, the meri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Ashutosh Chamoli and Ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 8094/2014 & CM Nos.18890/2014 & 2781/2015 ADITYA SANWAL & ORS versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS AND + W.P.(C) 9429/2014 & CM No.21294/2014 ..... Petitioners ASHUTOSH CHAMOLI & ORS versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS AND + W.P.(C) 8193/2014 & CM No.19070/2014 ..... Petitioners PALAK GUPTA ..... Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS AND + W.P.(C) 604/2015 & CM No.1035/2015 ..... Respondents SARAPREMASHISH BUTOLA & ORS. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents ..... Respondents ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rakesh C. Agrawal, Mr N. K. Bhatnagar and Ms Astha in W.P.(C) 8094/2014. Mr Deepak Vohra and Mr Vipin Malik in W.P.(C) 8193/2014. Mr K. Anand Singh and Mr Lauv Kumar in W.P.(C) 604/2015. For the Respondents : Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Palak Gupta Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Sarapremashish Butola and Ors. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univ ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

M.L.Bhuyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 12, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: March 23, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 2838/2012 M.L.BHUYAN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Madhusmita Bora & Mr.Bijay Pradhan, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner lays a challenge to the order dated October 11, 2011 imposing a penalty of reduction of his pension by 25% for a period of five years for the alleged act of gross misconduct in the year 1999-2000 in purchase of medicines.2. The factual matrix concerning the writ petition is that the petitioner joined Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) as a Doctor in the year 1974. On attaining the age of superannuation he retired as DIG (Medical) on May 31, 2009. The petitioner was posted as CMO, Divisional HQ, Itanagar, A.P. in the year 1999-2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Lajpat Rai (Since Deceased) Thr: Lrs Vs. D.D.A.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 23rd 2015 % + W.P.(C) 13840/2006 LAJPAT RAI (SINCE DECEASED) THR: LRS ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. Versus D.D.A. Represented by: .... Respondent Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 10.07.2006 whereby MIG plot No.272, Pocket-9, Sector-21, Rohini, Delhi, measuring 60 sq.mtr., allotted to him under Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981 (Rohini Extension) has been cancelled.2. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondent to hand over the physical possession of above mentioned plot to the petitioner.3. It is pertinent to note that the petitioner died during the pendency of present petition. Accordingly, vide order dated 02.05.2008, passed in CM. No.6480/2008, legal heirs of the petitioner were directed to be brought on record.4. Facts of the case are that the petitione...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Shri Himanshu Pande Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :March 18, 2015 Judgment Delivered on :March 23, 2015 + WP(C)No.5934/2012 SHRI HIMANSHU PANDE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Praying that the orders dated October 24, 2002, June 10, 2009, September 15, 2011 and September 07, 2012 be quashed. Mandamus sought by the petitioner is that the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) be directed to grant seniority to the petitioner along with the 32nd Batch based on petitioners merit, or in the alternative the petitioner be at least placed above the entire 33rd Batch including Manish Kumar Bharti, Rajiv Kumar, Amit Kumar and Ramesh Chandra.2. The four persons named above were not impleaded as a respondent in the writ petition when it was originally filed but, later...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Gaya Prasad Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on :March 19, 2015 Judgment Delivered on :March 23, 2015 + WP(C) No.1142/2012 GAYA PRASAD Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Gaya Prasad is aggrieved because the Department has bid him a departure : penalizing him for a wrong done by way of an order of compulsory retirement.2. He was charged for a serious misconduct and grave carelessness in terms of confidential letters dated July 13, 2009, July 20, 2009, July 22, 2009, July 24, 2009, July 26, 2009 and July 31, 2009 sent by the Assistant Security Commissioner (RPF) Aligarh informing that while working as an Assistant Sub-Inspector at Khurja, on July 13, 2009 the petitioner did not confiscate 15 bags of rice at the site in accordance with the rules becaus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Aditya Sanwal and Ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University an ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.