Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Noddy Auto Pvt. Ltd Vs. M/S Honda Cars India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. No.945/2014 % Judgement pronounced on:27. 03.2015 M/S NODDY AUTO PVT. LTD ... Petitioner Through: Mr.Abinash K. Mishra, Advocate. versus M/S HONDA CARS INDIA LTD. .......Respondent Through: Mr Jagdev Singh and Mr.Ankit Verma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Review Petition 418/2014 1. This order shall dispose of the review petition for review of the order dated 12th August, 2014.2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner/applicant that petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 was filed along with stay application. It had been urged that the respondent had violated Clause 9.4 of the dealership agreement which had mandated a party to give a prior notice for showing its intent of not renewing of existing agreement. The respondent had violated the terms and conditions of the dealership agreement. The petitioner had initiated the arbitral proceedings. It is submitted that t...
M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Babu and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...
Sachin Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :27. h MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 185/2012 SACHIN Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Aurora, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. AND + CRL.A. 838/2010 KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Aurora, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellants Sachin (A-1) and Krishan Kumar (A-2) impugn a judgment dated 05.10.2009 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.65/08 emanating from FIR No.212/08 PS Kashmiri Gate, by which they were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 363/366A/34 IPC read with Section 376 (2)(g) IPC. By an order dated 07.10.2009, they were sentenced to undergo RI for three years with fine ` 100/- each under Sections 363/34 IPC;...
Guru Harkrishan Public School Through Its Managing Vs. Directorate of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8058/2011 & C.M.No.20480/2014 27th March, 2015 % GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL THROUGH ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate. Versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. T.N. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. As detailed hereinafter, a very difficult position has arisen in the facts of the present case because of two different judgments passed by two different learned Single Judges of this Court on the interpretation of Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules,1973).2. By the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner/School had challenged the judgment of the Delhi ...
Pes Installations Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:23. d February,2015 Judgment Delivered on:27. h March, 2015 % + WP(C) 1351/2015 & CM No.2374/2015 PES INSTALLATIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR. .. Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners: Mr Sanjiv Behl with Mr Madhur Dhingra and Mr Eklavya Behl. For the Respondents: Mr Vikram Jetly with Mr Ankur Chibber for R1/UOI. Mr P.K. Bansal for respondent No.2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition for directing the respondents to consider the bid of the petitioners along with the other participants in the tender. The validity of the Bank Guarantee submitted by the Petitioners as Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) along with the Bid was short by 7 days. On the opening of the bids it was =============================================================== di...
Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs. M/S Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.233/2014 Reserved on:13. h February, 2015 Date of Decision:27. h March, 2015 % COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus M/s COTTON NATURALS (I) PVT. LTD. Respondents Through Mr. Ved Jain with Mr. Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.The question raised in the present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) relates to determination of arms length rate of interest, paid to the assessed, i.e. Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd., by their subsidiary M/s JPC Equestrian, a company registered in the United States of America. The appeal emanates from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short), dated 30th October, 2013, and pertains to the assessment year 2007- 08.2. On the basis of the contentions raised by the parties, the following substanti...
Krown Agro Foods Pvt. Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. h March, 2015 Judgment pronounced on:27. h March 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.5330/2014 KROWN AGRO FOODS PVT. LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE5(1) NEW DELHI ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr K.R. Manjani, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal with Mr Shashank Menon and Mr Aamir Aziz, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner, by way of the present writ petition, has challenged the order dated 23.06.2014 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax disposing of the objections filed by the petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the very issuance of the notice dated 18.03.2014. ===================================================================== W.P.(C) 5330/2014...
M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Lal Bahadur and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...
Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd Vs. The Designated Authority and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 03.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2015 W.P. (C) 3022/2014 MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr Advocate with Mr Ratheesh M. + W.P.(C) 3023/2014 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No....
Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 03.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2015 W.P. (C) 3022/2014 MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr Advocate with Mr Ratheesh M. + W.P.(C) 3023/2014 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »