Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shipali Sharma Vs. Gaurav Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 27, 2015. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 52/2013 SHIPALI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Singh Senior Advocate with Mr.S. Venkatesh, Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala, Advocates versus GAURAV SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.C. Singhal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against judgment/decree dated 11.09.2013 passed by the learned Family Court, Rohini, New Delhi in HMA No.164/2010, whereby the marriage between the appellant and respondent has been dissolved on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.2. Assailing the legality and correctness of the impugned judgment, Mr. Vikas Singh, learned Senior Advocate, counsel for the appellant vehemently contende...
Ravi Dass Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March27, 2015. + W.P.(C) 3347/2014 RAVI DASS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Raman Duggal, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION...... Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh & Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the correctness of the order dated 04.10.2013 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) in Original Application (in short OA) No.1491/2012. The petitioner also seeks to challenge the order dated 06.01.2014 passed by the learned Tribunal dismissing the Review Application (in short RA) No.187/2013 preferred by the petitioner.2. In the said OA No.1491/2012, the petitioner who has been...
Gugan Vs. Commissioner of Police and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:27. h March 2015 + W.P.(C) 3182/2015 GUGAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocates versus % COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Mr. Kamlesh Anand, Advocates for respondent No.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER2703.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.5678/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.3182/2015 1. By the instant Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the tenability of the impugned order dated 22.12.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the Original Application preferred by the petitioner.2. We would now turn to the facts of the case for better comprehension:The petitioner was selected to...
Naresh Kumar and Ors Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$-11 &12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 683/2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. versus NARESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Badri Dass, Adv. with Mr. Dev Dutta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. + MAC.APP. 178/2014 NARESH KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Badri Dass, Adv. with Mr. Dev Dutta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of judgment dated 18.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of ` 18,74,400/- was awarded for the death of Dinesh Kumar, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 27.06.2012.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the ac...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Naresh Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$-11 &12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 683/2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. versus NARESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Badri Dass, Adv. with Mr. Dev Dutta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. + MAC.APP. 178/2014 NARESH KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Badri Dass, Adv. with Mr. Dev Dutta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of judgment dated 18.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of ` 18,74,400/- was awarded for the death of Dinesh Kumar, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 27.06.2012.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the ac...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chitra Bahadur Khatri and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
$-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 899/2011 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. with Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Adv. & Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. versus CHITRA BAHADUR KHATRI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 03.08.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.1,96,034/- was awarded to Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 02.04.2010.2. At the time of hearing of the appeal, negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle and the quantum of compensation is not challenged.3. It is urged by learned counsel for the Appellant that the Appellant had proved before the Claims Tribunal that...
Anant Ram Vs. Ridhima Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2015 Decided on:26. h March, 2015 % + RC.REV. 314/2013 and CM Nos.13042/2013 and 20234/2013 ANANT RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 316/2013 and CM Nos. 13070/2013 and 20222/2013 SAMEER NARULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 405/2013 and CM Nos.17415/2013 and 5127/2014 ADARSH DISTRIBUTORS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhiraj Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA RC.REV.Nos.314/2013, 316/2013 and 405/2013 Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.S...
Sameer Narula and Ors. Vs. Ridhima Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2015 Decided on:26. h March, 2015 % + RC.REV. 314/2013 and CM Nos.13042/2013 and 20234/2013 ANANT RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 316/2013 and CM Nos. 13070/2013 and 20222/2013 SAMEER NARULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 405/2013 and CM Nos.17415/2013 and 5127/2014 ADARSH DISTRIBUTORS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhiraj Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA RC.REV.Nos.314/2013, 316/2013 and 405/2013 Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.S...
Adarsh Distributors and Ors. Vs. Ridhima Lamba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2015 Decided on:26. h March, 2015 % + RC.REV. 314/2013 and CM Nos.13042/2013 and 20234/2013 ANANT RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 316/2013 and CM Nos. 13070/2013 and 20222/2013 SAMEER NARULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. S.P.Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Uddhav Pratap, Advocates. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.Sidharth Das, Advocates. RC.REV. 405/2013 and CM Nos.17415/2013 and 5127/2014 ADARSH DISTRIBUTORS & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhiraj Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus RIDHIMA LAMBA RC.REV.Nos.314/2013, 316/2013 and 405/2013 Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Mr.S...
Cambridge Foundation School and Anr. Vs. Sh. v.R. Subramanian and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2583/2014 26th March, 2015 % CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. K.R.Sunder Rao, Adv. versus SH. V.R. SUBRAMANIAN & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-School-Cambridge Foundation School Rajouri Garden Extension, New Delhi impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 29.10.2013 by which the Delhi School Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the respondent no.1 herein and directed that the action taken by the petitioner herein/School for reduction of basic pay of the respondent no.1 herein from that of a Lab-Assistant to a Lab-Attendant Class-IV employee, is quashed. Putting it differently, the Tribunal has, by the impugned jud...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »