Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tractel Tirfor India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nehru Place Hotels Ltd. and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 221/2014 Reserved on:30. h January 2015 Decision on:24. h February 2015 TRACTEL TIRFOR INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Girdhar Govind with Ms. Noor Alam, Advocates. versus NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Mishra with Mr. S.D. Behl, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT2402.2015 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 1st November 2013 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1.2. A contract dated 30th June 2004 was entered into between Respondent No.1 and the Petitioner whereunder the Petitioner was to supply and instal a window cleaning system for the multi-storeyed parking and commercial complex of Respondent No.1 at Nehru Place, New Delhi. The contract was to be performed within a period of 8 to 12 weeks from the date of the execution of the co...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Naresh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 721/2014 Reserved on :06. 02.2015 Date of decision:24. 02.2015 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State. Insp.Raj Singh, P.T.C. versus NARESH AND ANR. Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.1. The State has preferred this leave to appeal against the judgment dated 7.8.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.27/2010 (reference FIR No.213/2000, PS Bawana, Delhi) whereby Respondent No.1 Naresh and Respondent No.2 Nitin @ Sonia have been acquitted of the charges under Sections 302/506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The aforementioned Respondents had been charged for murder of Satish, since he had failed to return money which he had borrowed from the Respondents-accused.3. After having gone through the Trial Cou...
Padmini Hindupur Vs. Abhijit S Bellur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 02.2015 Judgment delivered on :24. 02.2015 CS(OS) 2916/2014 PADMINI HINDUPUR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri and Mr. Nishant Anand, Advs. versus ABHIJIT S BELLUR Through ..... Defendant Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Trideep and Ms. Dharini Ravi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A. No.18648/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC) 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff wife against her defendant husband seeking an anti-suit injunction.2. The case as set up by the plaintiff is that the parties had got married on 26.02.2012 at Bangalore according to Hindu rites. Both parties come from a backgrounds of status. Two days after the marriage, the defendant went back to the United State where he was working. The plaintiff stayed with her in-laws. She joined her husband in USA on 26.09.2012. This was after r...
Satish and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~121 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 701/2015 SATISH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Kunwer Pal Singh, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Gulshan Kumar, PS Mayur Vihar Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.153/2007 under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 29th January, 2015 (Annexure P-3) arrived at between the parties at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in...
Sanjeev Bansal and Anr. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3399/2014 SANJEEV BANSAL & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Through: .... Respondents Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Deepak PS Mangolpuri Respondents-in-person CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.206/2012 under Section 304-A IPC registered at Police Station Mangolpuri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the deceased accidentally died of electrocution while working on plastic dana cutting machine and no negligence is attributable to petitioners. However, it is asserted that legal heirs of deceased i.e. respondents No.2 & 3 have been suitably compensated. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that all the respondents are present in the Court and status report has been placed on record. Respondent No.2-Ramesh Singh, present in the court, is complai...
Baldev Sharma and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4855/2014 BALDEV SHARMA & ORS Through: .... Petitioners Mrs. Brijinder Khurana, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .... Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Saroj Bala Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.557/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Amar Colony, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement of 15th April, 2014 (Annexure-C). Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Saroj Bala on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 4855/2014 Page 1 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the disp...
Cit-V Vs. Nortel Networks India a. Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :24. 02.2015 + ITA1152015, C.M. APPL.3043/2015, 3044/2015 & 3045/2015 CIT-V ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus NORTEL NETWORKS INDIA A PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Deepak Chopra and Ms. Manasvini Bajpai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Revenue is in appeal against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA4765Del/2011 and 425/Del/2013. The ITAT had allowed the assessees appeals. The question of law urged in this case is: ITA1152015 Page 1 Whether the ITAT fell into error in directing inclusion of data and particulars pertaining to Cyber Media Events Limited in the transfer pricing studies, to determine arms length price (ALP) for the purpose of income tax. 2. The assessee is engaged in installation, maintenance, ...
Saurabh Agrawal and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 CRL.M.C. 3137/2013 + SAURABH AGRAWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Chander Bhan CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.126/2011, under Sections 498- A/406/323/342/34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at police station Rajouri Garden, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 4th September, 2012 arrived at Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Respondent No.2-Mrs. Arpita Agrawal @ Arpita Gupta was put to notice. Now, she has sent a written communication of 13th January, 2015 virtually indicating that she is not desirous of any hearing in this matter. Mr.Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL.M.C. 3137/2013 Page 1 respondent-State submits that the ...
Kumar Gaurav and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~126 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 708/2015 KUMAR GAURAV & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. M.A.Hashmi &Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocates versus THE STATE & ANR Through: .... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Bhoori Singh, PS Karawal Nagar Mr. Zahid Ali, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.2706/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.708/2015 Quashing of FIR No.502/2013 under Section 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 18th December, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Crl.M.C.No.708/2015 Page 1 Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Zahid Ali, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. L...
Noshir Jal Driver and Ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
$~23 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4482/2014 & Crl.M.A.15358/2014 SHAILESH HARISHCHANDRA RAJADHYAKSHA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma and Mr. Apoorva Pandey, Advocates versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, for respondent No.1 + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4485/2014 & Crl.M.A. 15364/2014 NOSHIR JAL DRIVER & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma and Mr. Apoorva Pandey, Advocates versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 4482 & 4485 of 2014 Page 1 J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of Criminal Complaint No.123/2013, under Section 629 (A) for contravention of Section 293(1)(d) of the Companies Act, ...