Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tarun Sharma@vivek Sharma and Ors. Vs. Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 669/2015 & Crl.M.A.2578/2015 TARUN SHARMA @ VIVEK SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Divya Malhotra, Advocate versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Aditi Lily Mr. B.N. Singhvi, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.24/2010, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in Family Courts order of 10th December, 2014. Notice. Mr. Praveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. B.N.Singhvi, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 669/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Cou...
Krbl Ltd Vs. Lal Mahal Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :18. 02.2015. Judgment delivered on :23. 02.2015 CS(OS) 427/2014 KRBL LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitsha Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr.April Chandhal Jha, Advs. Versus LAL MAHAL LTD AND ANR Through ..... Defendants Mr.Mohan Vidhani, Mr. Rahul Vidhani and Mr. Ashish Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.I.A.No.2842/2014 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC) 1 Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff (M/s KRBL Limited) against the defendants under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copy Right Act, 1957; relief of permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery etc. has been prayed for. 2 The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. It has a registered office at Lahori Gate, Delhi. It is engaged in the business of processing, marketing and exporting of rice i...
Vikram Soni Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C.No.4633/2014 VIKRAM SONI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.L.Soni, Advocate versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Pramod Kumar PS Patel Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.41/2014, under Sections 279/337 IPC and under Section 134(A) of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 9th September, 2014 (Annexure-P-2) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, is the complainant party of the FIR in question and they have been identified to be so by SI Pramod Kumar of Police Station Patel Nagar on the basis of iden...
Deepak Seth, Proprietor M/S Pearl Wears Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~23 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 7795/2014 DEEPAK SETH, PROPRIETOR M/S PEARL WEARS ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent/ LAC For the Respondent/ DDA For the Respondent /UOI : Mr Ashok Chhabra :Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr M. Tapan Sharma CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the201. Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafte...
Inderpreet Singh Jhelumi Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 9064/2014 and CM No.20683/2014 INDERPREET SINGH JHELUMI ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondent No.1 : Mr J.P.N. Shahi For the Respondent No.2 & 3: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent No.4 : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 3 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit in view of the averments already contained in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (h...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Lal Babu Jha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d February, 2015 + MAC.APP.222/2013 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus LAL BABU JHA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Dr. Pratyusit Nandan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. There is twin challenge to the judgment dated 22.11.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `5,98,176/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 and 2 for the death of their son Ajit Kumar Jha, a bachelor who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 17.12.2007.2. It is urged that the compensation awarded is exorbitant and excessive in as much as in case of a bachelor, the multiplier ought to have been taken as per the age of the Claimants rather than of the deceased. Reliance is placed on U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC362 New India Assurance ...
Manvender Singh@bhanu Vs. The State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C.No.673/2015 MANVENDER SINGH@BHANU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zafar Sidique & Mr. Sher Mohd. Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Balbeer Singh & HC Hoshyar Singh, PS Shahdara Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.2582/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.673/2015 Quashing of FIR No.510/2014, under Sections 408 of IPC registered at Police Station, Shahdara, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 5th January, 2015 (Annexure P-2) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared Crl.M.C.No.673/2015 Page 1 between the parties. Notice. Mr.Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState accepts notice and submits that inves...
Sanjeev Tyagi and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 682/2015 & Crl.M.A.2602/2015 SANJEEV TYAGI & ANR Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Vijay Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.245/2001, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Trilok Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 6th January, 2015 (Annexure-D). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Vijay Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. ...
Anguri Devi Vs. Ram Chander and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.193/2007 & C.M. No.1354/2015 Decided on :23. d February, 2015 ANGURI DEVI Through: Appellant Mr. Rahul Srivastava & Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocates. Versus RAM CHANDER & ORS Through: Respondents Mr. Hamilton Simpsor, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, SC for EDMC for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 24.1.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge allowing the appeal of the respondents/defendants.2. On 28.10.2010, my learned predecessor had framed the following substantial question of law :Whether the impugned judgment dated 24.1.2007 had misconstrued and misread the documenst,i.e., the sale deed exhibited as Ex. PW11 and the rectification deed exhibited as Ex. PW11A?. If so, its effect?.3. Before dealing with the aforesaid question, so-called substantial question of law, it may be pertinent here to give brief bac...
Sunita Dass Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-23-2015
$~28 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 7807/2014 & CM183332014 SUNITA DASS ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Vasisht with Mr Vishal Singh, Ms Jyoti Kataria and Mr M.P. Bhargava. For the Respondent/UOI : Ms Monika Arora with Mr Abhishek Choudhary For the Respondent Nos.4&5: Mr sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the201. Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter refe...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »