Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narender Singh Rana Vs. Director, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2761/2014 & CM57252014 (stay) % 2nd February, 2015 NARENDER SINGH RANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Joshi, Mr. Birender Singh Rawat, Advocates versus DIRECTOR, NEHRU MEMORIAL MUSEUM & LIBRARY Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Chetan Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus or any appropriate writ for setting aside the advertisement dated 22nd to 28th June, 2013 for the post of Senior Technical Assistant STA (Museum). Relief in the writ petition is claimed on the ground that the post of Senior Technical Assistant STA (Museum) cannot be filled in by direct recruitment but can only be filled by promotion from departmental candidates. Relief is also prayed for promoting the petitioner to a post as per his eligibility ...
M/S Kamla Devi Memorial Educational Welfare and Ch Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 8102/2014 & C M Appl1. 8902/2014 M/S KAMLA DEVI MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL WELFARE AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY .... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Yashraj Singh Deora, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms Puja Sarkar for UOI. Mr Dhanesh Relan and Mr Arush Bhandari for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ p...
Luminous Power Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vinay Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:02. 02.2015 CRL.L.P. 268/2014 & CRL MA59702014 LUMINOUS POWER TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Goswami and Mr. K Bhimraj Achary, Advocates versus VINAY AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Peeyosh Kalra and Mr. Abhishek B, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. This leave petition has been preferred to assail the judgment of the learned Civil Judge-I/MM, New Delhi in CC No.48/2012, whereby the learned Civil Judge/MM has dismissed the complaint preferred by the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act).2. The case of the petitioner/complainant was that the respondent was appointed as a distributor of the petitioner, which manufactures invertors and supplies batteries. The case of the petitioner was that the respondent/accused had issued the cheque in question for Rs.1,68,...
Bhajan Pura Co-Operative Urban Thrift and Credit Soc Vs. State Govt. o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:02. 02.2015 CRL.L.P. 50/2015 BHAJAN PURA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vipin Dilawari, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) Crl. M.A. No.1544/2015 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 50/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.1543/2015 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Even if one were to condone the delay of 92 days for the reasons stated in the application, there is no merit in this petition.4. The case of the complainant is that the accused/ respondent No.2 is a member of the complainant society. The accused stood surety for one Sh.Inderjeet Singh, who had taken a loan from the petitioner in August 2007. He also stood surety for one Sh. Raj Kumar, who too, had taken a loan from the petitioner in Augus...
State Vs. Mahadev and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.464/2014 Date of decision :2. d February, 2015 % . APPELLANT STATE Through : Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State. versus .RESPONDENTS MAHADEV & ORS. Through : Mr. M. K. Gautam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Delhi against the judgment dated 26.04.2014 of Shri Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge-01 (West), Delhi in SC No.104/2010 acquitting the respondents of the charges under Section 498-A/304-A/34 Indian Penal Code and in alternative 302-A/34 Indian Penal Code.2. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that Smt. Geeta got married to accused Mahadev on 16.02.2010; that she was subjected to cruelty and harassment being unable to meet the demands of dowry made by the respondents; that on 25.06.2010, she was reportedly brought dead at Deen Dayal Up...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. M/S Satish Steel Traders and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.325/2014 Decided on :2. d February,2015 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Arun Birbal, Adv. versus M/S SATISH STEEL TRADERS AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.R.K.Jain and Mr.Rajesh Garg, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated 30.05.2013. As a matter of fact, the appellant had earlier filed a civil revision petition against rejection of an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 310 days by the learned ADJ in RCA No.59/2013.2. My learned predecessor vide order dated 25.09.2014 treated the order dated 30.05.2013 rejecting the application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 310 days in filing the RCA No.59/2013 as an appealable order in view of a Division Bench Judgment of the Supreme Court in Shyam Sunder Sarma v. Pannalal Jaiswal & Ors.; AIR2005SC226 This is how the Civil Re...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›