Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Power Ltd. Vs. Sarover Hospital and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$ 4-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:25. 02.2015 CRL.A. 652/2008 NORTH DELHI POWER LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikram Nandrajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates versus SAROVER HOSPITAL & ANR Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. R.N. Sharma and Mr. Avinash Vats, Advocates CRL.A. 653/2008 NORTH DELHI POWER LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikram Nandrajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates versus SAROVER HOSPITAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Mr. Avinash Vats, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. These appeals are listed for hearing. However, learned counsel for the respondent has drawn the attention of the Court to two previous orders dated 16.07.2009 and 18.05.2010, to submit that, firstly, the preliminary objection of the respondent needs to be considered.2. The submission of learned counsel for the respondent is that the present appeals had been preferred, as if the appellant had a stat...
Brahm Dev Gupta Vs. Container Corporation of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19.02.2015 Judgment delivered on :25.02.2015 CS(OS) 2033/2010 BRAHM DEV GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Akhil Sibal, Mr. Kamal Gupta and Mr.Abhisehk Gupta, Advocates Versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR .... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi K.Awasthi and Mr. Raghav Ghai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff Brahm Dev Gupta against the two defendants. The first defendant is the Container Corporation of India Limited (CONCOR) and the second defendant is New India Assurance Company Limited. 2 The case of the plaintiff is that he is carrying on the business of import and export under the name and style of M/s D.S.M. International. He is the sole proprietor. Defendant No.1 is a public limited company. In the course of its business, the plaintiff had entrusted a consignment meant for export to defendant No....
Shiv Industries Vs. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.156/2014 Decided on :25. h February, 2015 SHIV INDUSTRIES Through: Appellant Mr. V.K. Goel, Advocate. Versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD Through: None. Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 22.3.2014 passed by Sh. Pankaj Gupta, the learned Additional District Judge in R.C.A. No.59/2013 by virtue of which the judgment and the decree dated 13.8.2013 passed by Ms. Ruchi Aggarwal Asrani, the learned Civil Judge was upheld.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present appellant, M/s. Shiv Industries, a proprietary concern had filed a suit through its sole proprietor Vinod Kumar Gupta for permanent and mandatory injunction. The prayer in the suit was that the respondent, that is, North Delhi Power Limited be restrained from raising and realizing the amount of theft bill in respect of electricity connection No...
Mahender Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2822/2014 & Crl.M.A.9682/2014 MAHENDER KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.L. Shamra, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DLEHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Jagdish Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.25/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at police station New Usman Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 15th January, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Annexure-B) as well as subsequent Mediated Settlement of 14th March, 2014 arrived at Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi (Annexure-C). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Cour...
Pankaj Rajput@bunty and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 747/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.2819/2015 PANKAJ RAJPUT @ BUNTY & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Avinash Gupta, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Kamlesh Kumar Mr. Ajay Burman, Mr. Karan Burman and Mr. Amrit Raj, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.168/2012, under Sections 498A/406/307/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Ranjit Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement of 30th April, 2014. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice of this petition. Mr. Ajay Burman, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2 and he has placed on record his Vakalatnama/ Power of Attoreney, which is taken on record. Crl.M.C. No....
Kamal Singh Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 739/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.2809/2015 KAMAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Neeraj Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.218/2014, under Section 288/337 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Mandawali Fazalpur, Delhi is sought on the ground that the incident in question was purely accidental and no negligence is attributable to the petitioner. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2 is the first-informant/complainant of FIR in question and he is present in the Court and he has been identified to be so by SI Neeraj on the basis of identity proof produced by him. It is submitted that two minor children of second respondent had sustained injuri...
Sh.V.K. Jain Vs. Delhi Pollution Control Committee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5491/2012 25th February, 2015 % SH.V.K. JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Mr. Anish Gupta and Mr. Tanuj, Advocates versus DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate AND + W.P.(C) No.5524/2012 SANJAY VATS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Mr. Anish Gupta and Mr. Tanuj, Advocates versus DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.5491/2012 1. This writ petition has been remanded for decision by the Division Bench of this Court by the order dated 18.2.2015 observing that the learned Single Judge of this Court who decided the writ petition on 17.7.2014 should have decided all the aspects in the writ petition and not decided the writ petition only with respect to one aspect of fresh promotions to b...
Vinod Thakur Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2789/2014 VINOD THAKUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishnu Shamra and Mohd. Irsad, Advocates versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Parmod Kumar Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.393/2013, under Sections 420/34 of IPC registered at police station subhash Place, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 22nd May, 2014 and affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant CRL.M.C. 2789...
Joint Investments Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:25. 02.2015 + ITA1172015 JOINT INVESTMENTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Angad Sandhu, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Revenue. With consent the appeal was heard finally.2. The assessee is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter referred to as ITAT) in ITA85Del/2014 and urges that in the facts and circumstances, the ITAT fell into error in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer (AO) ITA117-15 Page 1 with respect to the additions made under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules.3. The brief facts are that the assessee is engaged in diverse investment activities and in the course of its bus...
Naveen Malhotra Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:25. 02.2015 TR.P.(CRL.) 11/2015 NAVEEN MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. O.P. Gulabani & Ms. Swati Goswami, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP along with SI Vijender, PS-S.J.Enclave for the respondent No.1/State. Mr. Rajan Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) Crl. M.A. No.2807/2015 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. TR.P.(CRL.) 11/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.2806/2015 3. This petition has been preferred under Section 407 Cr.P.C. to seek transfer of the Complaint Case Nos.818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 827, 828 & 829/2013, all under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) pending trial in the Court of Ms. Deepti Devesh, learned M.M., Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, titled...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »