Skip to content

Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 24 2015

Dilip Kumar Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2169/2012 DILIP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Latika Dutta & Mr. Rahul Chopra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2402.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.655/2015 By this application filed under Section 148 read with Section 151, CPC, the respondents seek enlargement of time to fill up the post of Deputy Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities in compliance with order dated 11.02.2013 passed by this Court. We have heard Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the Govt. of NCT of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the GNCTD). Mr. Salwan, the learned ASC for the GNCTD submits that vide order dated 25.04.2012 this Court while disposing of the main Writ Petition directed the respondents to issue a fresh notification for ...


Feb 24 2015

Radha Krishan Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6950/2014 RADHA KRISHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Bansal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhra Parashar and Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Pancham Lal, Head Clerk for R-2 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2402.2015 1. This is a writ petition whereby, in effect, the petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 21.10.2013. The petitioner, who is 97 years old, has been running from pillar to post, at least, since 1989, to get pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (in short Scheme). 1.1 It is the petitioners case that his father who was working in the British Administration as Collector and District Magistrate asked him to leave the family home as he was bent upon taking part in the freedom struggle. 1.2 The petitioner, avers, that he, participated in the Quit India Movement, and that, in this process, he was imprisoned in Sukkur Jail (Sind), ...


Feb 24 2015

Shailesh Harishchandra Rajadhyaksha and Ors. Vs. Registrar of Companie ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

$~23 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 24, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 4482/2014 & Crl.M.A.15358/2014 SHAILESH HARISHCHANDRA RAJADHYAKSHA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma and Mr. Apoorva Pandey, Advocates versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, for respondent No.1 + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4485/2014 & Crl.M.A. 15364/2014 NOSHIR JAL DRIVER & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma and Mr. Apoorva Pandey, Advocates versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON' BLE MR. J USTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 4482 & 4485 of 2014 Page 1 J UDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of Criminal Complaint No.123/2013, under Section 629 (A) for contravention of Section 293(1)(d) of the Companies Act, ...


Feb 24 2015

Surjeet Singh Kalra and Ors. Vs. Darshan Lal and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h February, 2015 % + CM(M) 62/2013 and CM No.934/2013 SURJEET SINGH KALRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus DARSHAN LAL & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advocates. CM(M) 65/2013 and CM No.1001/2013 SURJEET SINGH KALRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Advocate. versus DARSHAN LAL & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The present petitions arise from a common impugned judgment dated 30th November, 2012 whereby two appeals of the Respondent being RCT No.40/2009 and RCT No.67/2011 were decided in favour of the Respondent and the order dated 20th August, 2011 dismissing the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and eviction order dated 20th November, 2008 were set aside subject to payment of cost of Rs.15,000/- by the Respondent. The Respon...


Feb 24 2015

State Vs. Neeraj @ Lukka

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.341/2014 Date of decision:24. h February 2015 % . Petitioner STATE Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. versus ..Respondent NEERAJ LAL@LUKKA Through : None. CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The State seeks leave to file an appeal under Section 378(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure to challenge the judgment dated 19.10.2013, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Case No.27/2012, whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charges under Section 363/364/302 and section 201 of Indian Penal Code.2. To appreciate the contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner/State, a brief summary of the prosecution case is given below:On 11.04.2012, complainant Suresh @ Pappu (PW2) lodged a report regarding his son Atul @ Bunty missing since 10.04.2012 from 9pm onwards. FIR Ex.PW1/A was registered. CCTV footage of th...


Feb 24 2015

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Nthadiseng Josephina Bulaya and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A. 1311/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.14713/2014 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Through ..... Appellant Mr.Mohit Arora, Adv. with Mr.B.S. Arora, Adv. versus NTHADISENG JOSEPHINA BULAYA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Gaurav Chandhok, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The facts as per record and recorded by the trial court are : (a) On 20th July, 2013 Sh. Rajesh Kumar, IO received information from Inspector Tulsi Ram, CISF that two foreign nationals namely Nthadiseng Josephina and Grace Bongiwe who were to depart from IGI Airport for Gaborone via Nairobi by Kenya Airways flight 221 were suspected to be carrying huge quantity of narcotic drugs in their baggage. (b) The information was reduced into writing and put up before Sh. R.K. Singh, Superintendent, NCB and on his instructions a raiding team consisting of Intelligence Officers of NCB namely, C.S.K. Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Vishw...


Feb 24 2015

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Mohd. Sher Nabi Chaman and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % C.M.(M) No.304/2014 24th February, 2015 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus MOHD. SHER NABI CHAMAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.A.Maitri, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.No.2131/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. C.M.No.2132/2015 There is no opposition to this application which is allowed and the delay in filing C.M.No.2130/2015 is condoned. Application stands disposed of. C.M.No.2130/2015 1. By this application, the respondent no.1/plaintiff/applicant/review petitioner seeks modification of the consent order dated 07.11.2014 passed by this Court by which the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner/Delhi Development Authority (DDA) as also the main suit were disposed of. Counsel for respondent no.1/p...


Feb 24 2015

Kanhaiya Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h February, 2015 + CRL.A. 1540/2013 & Crl.M.B.10109/2014 KANHAIYA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal and Mr.R.C.S.Bhadhauria, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.O.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CRL.A. 1617/2013 DALIP @ BABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishan Kumar with Ms.Sunita Arora, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.O.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CRL.A. 1071/2014 & Crl.M.B.10226/2014 SANJAY KUMAR @ ANU Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.O.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Vide this common judgment, I shall dispose off three criminal appeals bearing Crl.A.Nos. Crl.A.1540/2013, Crl.A.1617/2013 and 1071/14, filed by Kanhaiya, Dalip @ Babban and Sanjay Kumar @ Anu respectively, ...


Feb 24 2015

R.K. Saxena Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1794/2015 & CM APPL. No.3194/2015 (Exemption) R.K. SAXENA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Shreya Mukherjee & Mr. Jeet Ram Dhangar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anil Grover & Ms. Divya Jain, Advocates for R-2 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 24.02.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.3194/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1794/2015 Challenge in the present Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the impugned order dated 13.11.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) thereby dismissing the O.A. No.4290/2013 preferred by the petitioner and to the order in review dated 05.01.2015 dismissing the R.A. No.228/2014. Assailing the said order, Mr. Shreya Mukherjee, th...


Feb 23 2015

Rajeev Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On : February 11, 2015 Judgment Delivered On : February 23, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.3416/2013 RAJEEV KUMAR Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate with Ms.Punam Singh and Mrs.Garima Sachdeva, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Sub-Inspector in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in November, 2003 and after serving at Vishakapatnam was posted at Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI Airport) in May, 2008.2. Along with SI Shashi Kumar and SI Ajay Yadav, the petitioner was deployed for duty in the intervening night of November 21, 2011 and November 22, 2011 at X-BIS-14 of Terminal III at the IGI Airport and the duty hours were between 20:00 hours of November 21, 2011 till 07:00 hours of November 22, 2011.3....


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial