Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayant Kumar Trehan Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~A-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on:04. 02.2015 Judgment pronounced on :25. 02.2015 CS(OS) 497/2013 JAYANT KUMAR TREHAN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Bhalla, Adv. versus HDFC BANK LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH,J.IA No.13608/2013 (under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC) 1. The present application is filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of mesne profits. The plaintiff is the owner of premises C-17, Ground Floor, Anand Niketan, New Delhi admeasuring 1800 square feet. The defendant entered into a lease for the said property in 2004. The lease deed was executed between the plaintiff and the defendant on 11.03.2005. The date of commencement of the lease was 01.06.2004 and it was for a period for five years i.e. up to 31.05.2009. On or before expiry of the lease the plaintiff sought ...
Neraj Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 25, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1824/2015 NERAJ KUMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Mr.Amandeep Joshi and Mr.Sameer Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr.Kunal Punj, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel appears for the respondents since advance copy of the writ petition was served and prays for disposal of the writ petition by placing reliance upon the latest policy decision dated January 19, 2015 issued by the Director General, CRPF on the subject of allotment and occupation of family accommodation at Sector-16-B, Pocket-2, Dwarka, New Delhi.2. The petitioner is undoubtedly posted in the State of Jammu & Kashmir.3. In the year 2006 a family accommodation was allotted to the petit...
Kuldeep and Ors. Vs. The State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~9 & 79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 25, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 5548/2014 MONU @ RAJEEV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anand Singh Malik and Mr. Kunal Husain, Advocates versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Balwan Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 5521/2014 KULDEEP & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with HC Anuj Mr. Anand Singh Malik and Mr. Kunal Husain, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 5548 & 5521 of 2014 Page 1 % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.440/2014, under Sections 323/324 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 5548/2014]. and FIR No.439/2014 under Sections 326...
M/S Panjwani Packaging Ltd. and Ors Vs. Allahabad Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h February, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1803/2015, C.M. No.3210/2015 (stay) & C.M. No.3211/2015 (Exemption) M/S PANJWANI PACKAGING LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. versus ALLAHABAD BANK ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. Through the writ petition at hand challenge is brought to order dated 03.11.2014 passed by Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in appeal No.115/2014 arising out of original application (OA) No.591/97 decided by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 11.10.2012.2. The background facts lie in a short compass and may be noted at the outset. The petitioner No.1 is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act having its office in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner No.2 is one of the Directors while petitioner No.3 is legal heir of one of the co-defendants (defendant No.7 since ...
Deepak Yadav Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h February, 2015. + W.P.(C) No.8967/2014 DEEPAK YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Ms. Ritika Jhurani, Advs. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Mahima Bahl & Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Arush Bhandari for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. for L&B Deptt. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns Section 33 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, as constitutionally invalid.2. Section 33 prohibits a bhumidhar (of agricultural land) from transferring by sale or gift or otherwise any land to any person where as a result of the transfer, the transferor shall be left with less than eight standard acres of land. However Sub-Section (2) of Section 33 clarifies that the said prohibition shall not preclu...
Anita Soharu Guleria Vs. Director of Educationand Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1845/2014 & Conn. 25th February, 2015 % +W.P.(C) No.1845/2014 ANITA SOHARU GULERIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A.Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION& ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Adv. for Ms. Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-1 with Ms. S. Agarwal, DEO, zone-20. Mr.R. Bala Subramanium, and Mr. Anukr Chhibber, Advs. for R-2 and 3 +W.P.(C) No.1944/2014 MANJU NAUTIYAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A.Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION& ORS. Through: WP(C) 1845/2014&conn. ..... Respondents Mr.R. Bala Subramanium, and Mr. Anukr Chhibber, Advs. for R-2 and 3 +W.P.(C) No.2112/2014 SHAYAM DUTT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A.Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION& ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for R-1. Mr.R. Bala Subramanium, and Mr. Anukr Chhibber, Advs. for R-2 an...
Uday Foundation for Congenital Defects and Rare Bl Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h February, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.8568/2010 UDAY FOUNDATION FOR CONGENITAL DEFECTS AND RARE BLOOD GROUPS .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Amicus Curiae. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Tiwari & Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Devendra Kumar & Mr. Anjum Javed, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. with Arvind Varma, Mr. Ajay Kohli & Ms. Aditi Kochhar, Advs. for NRAI. Mr. V.K. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bhumika Kapoor, Adv. for Halwai & Bakers Association. Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Adv. for R-7. Mr. Ashok Desai & Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs. with Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. for R-8. Mr. Mehmood Pracha & Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advs. for FSSAI. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...
Sonu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1727/2014 Reserved on:03. 02.2015 Date of decision:24. 02.2015 SONU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP along with Inspector Sher Singh, SHO, P.S.Burari. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.1. Appellant Sonu stands convicted vide impugned judgment dated 29th March, 2014 for committing murder of Chetan Pal @ Anu and for having attempted to murder Tulsi Kumar, PW.1; Rajesh Sharma, PW.5 and Kishan Singh Rawat, PW.9. Sonu has been sentenced to undergo Imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) and Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 307/34 IPC. In case of default of payment of fine, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo one year and six months simple...
Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA2022011 & CM Nos.5542/2012 & 12135/2012 (both for filing addl. docs.) Pronounced on:24. 02.2015 % JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.C. Bharuka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Jasmeet Kaur & Mr. Kaushik, Advs. Versus SARDA ENERGY AND MINERALS LTD & ORS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ratan Kr. Singh with Mr. J.K. Chaudhary, Mr. Vinod Chawla, Mr. Shashi Bhushan & Mr. Akshay Malhotra, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC with Mr. A.K. Sinha & Ms. Indu Prabha, Advs. Mr. Atul Jha & Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advs. for State of Chhattisgarh. AND + LPA2052011 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.C. Bharuka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Jasmeet Kaur & Mr. Kaushik, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC with Mr. A.K. Sinha & Ms. Indu Prabha, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Ratan Kr. Singh with Mr. J.K. Chaudhary,...
M/S. Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tarseem Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on February 18, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 24, 2015 + IA Nos. 497/2014 & 17214/2013 in OMP10642012 M/S. SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Jagjit Singh, Advocate with Ms.Nisha, Advocate versus TARSEEM KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Pramod Pandey, Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manoj Gupta, Advocate for applicant M/s. Shree Rathanam Restaurant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.IA Nos. 497/2014 (filed on behalf of impleaded respondent M/s. Shree Rathnam Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. to modify the order dated 17.4.2013) & 17214/2013 (under Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the petitioner for appointment of fresh Receiver) 1. By this order, I would dispose of two applications, one being IA17214of 2013 filed by the petitioner for appointing a new Receiver pursuant to order dated April 17, 2013 and IA4972014 file...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »