Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Bharat Buildtech Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Vrp Landbase Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2015
$~A-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved on :08. 01.2015 Judgement pronounced on :16. 01.2015 + CS(OS) 2489/2013 M/S BHARAT BUILDTECH PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Vibha Mahajan, Adv. versus M/S VRP LANDBASE PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr.Narendra Vashistha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.12380/2014 1. This is an application filed under Order 37 Rule 3 CPC (5) by the defendant for unconditional leave to defend the suit. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.60 lacs under Order 37 CPC.2. As per averments in the plaint, in May-June, 2012 one Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhir approached the plaintiff company for the purpose of making certain investments in real estate/land and properties. A mutual agreement took place between the plaintiff and the said Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhir. The plaintiff company for the purpose of investment in land/properties of the defendant company at the instance of Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhir issued...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shanti and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. h January, 2015 + MAC. APP. No.1021/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate Versus SHANTI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. impugns the judgment dated 17.08.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.2,85,955.75P was awarded to Respondents no.1 and 2 for death of Shri Tilak Raj, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 26.06.2006.2. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. First, that there was no negligence on the part of the tractor driver, i.e., driver of the vehicle insured with the Appellant. Deceased Tilak Raj himself was to be blamed for the unfortunate accident and thus the owner of the vehicle was not liable to pay ...
M/S D.G. Exports Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 1365/2014 & CM No.2834/2014 M/S D.G. EXPORTS ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr S. Venkatesh, Ms Deepika Kalia, Mr Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr Kapis Seth. For the Respondents : Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms Mahima Bahl. Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Sumit Gaur for R-3 & 4. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a circular dated 04.12.2008 being circular No.45 (RE-08)/2004-2009 (hereafter impugned circular) issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade (hereafter the DGFT) whereby the DGFT has proscribed export of goods, which are apparently in the nature of military stores, without a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Department of Defence Production and Supplies, Ministry of Defence (hereafter DoDP).2. According to t...
Monu Kumar @ Monu Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : December 22, 2014 Pronounced on : January 07,2015 + CRL.A. 1519/2014 MONU KUMAR @ MONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.B.S.Jain, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R.K.GAUBA, J.1. The appellant stood trial in the Court of Sh.Sanjay Garg, Additional Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma on the charge for offences punishable under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 307/34 IPC allegedly committed in the course of an incident that occurred at 7.10 PM on February 24, 2012 near house No.B-1/25, Rajbir Colony, Gharauli Extension, Delhi within the jurisdiction of Police Station Ghazipur (hereinafter referred to as the police station). As per the police case, three other persons had participated in the incident sharing the common intention with the appellant, they being S...
Ascent Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. No.15 of 2014 ASCENT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Khattar and Mr. Tileshwar Prasad, Advocates. versus PARSVNATH BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vijay Nair with Mr. Rajat Joneja and Ms. Neeharika Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER701.2015 1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Ascent Construction Private Ltd. (ACPL) seeking reference of the disputes that has arisen between the parties to arbitration.2. The background to the present petition is that the Respondent Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (PBPL), a subsidiary of Parsvnath Developers Limited, entered into an agreement dated 10th May 2011 with ACPL for execution of certain works at Parsvnath Exotica, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP. The value of the contract on the basis of the bill of quantity was Rs. 21,70,76,177. Clause 4.7.2.1 of the 'conditions of contract', which w...
Rajender Thr. Parokar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on : December 22, 2014 Pronounced on : January 07, 2015 CRL.A.713/2012 RAJENDER THR. PAROKAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari and Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajbir Malik, SHO PS Najafgarh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R.K.GAUBA, J.1. The appellant faced trial in sessions case No.83/2011, on conclusion of which he was found guilty and convicted for offences punishable under sections 302 and 498A of Indian Penal Code (IPC) vide judgment dated March 14, 2012 passed by Sh.Virender Bhat, Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka. Vide order on sentence passed on March 17, 2012 the learned trial court awarded imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under section 302 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under section 498A IPC. ...
S.P. Singh, Adg and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 121/2015 S.P. SINGH, ADG & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Sharma & Mr. Sumeer Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1 to R-3 with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer & Mr. B.K. Rout, Pairvi Officer, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER0701.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.182/2015 (EXEMPTION) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 121/2015 By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to the respondents to carry out a Cadre Review of existing Group A Service of Central Reserve Police Force (in short CRPF) in a time bound manner without any further delay in terms of the instructions already laid down by the Department of Personnel & Training (in short DoPT) t...
Balbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 07, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2925/2013 BALBIR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Trivedi and Mr.Ashok K.Vij, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Kumar Rout, Pairvi Officer, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the representative of the Department.2. Claiming to be born on October 08, 1950 and enrolled as a Constable (GD) in CRPF on August 12, 1969 the petitioner was served with a charge of memo on March 09, 2001 alleging against him that in the character certificate which he had submitted when he took employment and with respect to which character certificate, the department accepted the date of birth as indicated thereon, the petitioner interpolated the year of his birth by changing 1953 into 1950. It was alleged that the same was a serious offence.3. ...
S.P. Singh, Adg and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 121/2015 S.P. SINGH, ADG & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Sharma & Mr. Sumeer Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1 to R-3 with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer & Mr. B.K. Rout, Pairvi Officer, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER0701.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.182/2015 (EXEMPTION) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 121/2015 By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to the respondents to carry out a Cadre Review of existing Group A Service of Central Reserve Police Force (in short CRPF) in a time bound manner without any further delay in terms of the instructions already laid down by the Department of Personnel & Training (in short DoPT) t...
Monu Kumar @ Monu Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : December 22, 2014 Pronounced on : January 07,2015 + CRL.A. 1519/2014 MONU KUMAR @ MONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.B.S.Jain, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R.K.GAUBA, J.1. The appellant stood trial in the Court of Sh.Sanjay Garg, Additional Sessions Judge (East), Karkardooma on the charge for offences punishable under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 307/34 IPC allegedly committed in the course of an incident that occurred at 7.10 PM on February 24, 2012 near house No.B-1/25, Rajbir Colony, Gharauli Extension, Delhi within the jurisdiction of Police Station Ghazipur (hereinafter referred to as the police station). As per the police case, three other persons had participated in the incident sharing the common intention with the appellant, they being S...