Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dcm Shriram Consolidated Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
M/S Bayer Bioscience Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
Phonographic Performance Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 09, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.8144/2011 & CM. No.18341/2011 PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr. Neeraj K. Gupta, Advocates. Versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meghna Mishra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Akhil Sachar and Mr. Dheeraj P. Deo, Advocates for Respondent No.3. AND + W.P.(C) 7724/2011 & CM. Nos. 17493/2011, 19273/2011 and 3719/2012 PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. N.B. Joshi and Mr. Neeraj K. Gupta, Advocates. Versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos. 8144 & 7724 of 2011 ..... Respondents Mr. Ripudaman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. M.P. Singh and Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocates for Respondents No.1 and 2. Page 1 of 34 Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kartik Yadav, Advocate for Res...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prakash Chand and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$ -7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 172/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.A.K. Soni, Advocate versus PRAKASH CHAND & ORS. Through: None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20.11.2010 whereby compensation of Rs.8,27,408/- was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 24.11.2004 at 11:30 p.m.2. At the time of hearing of the appeal, the sole contention raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant is that since the Appellant had successfully proved breach of terms and conditions of policy, he was entitled to recovery rights against the insured(Respondent no.3), owner of the vehicle. Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate urges that although the Claims Tribunal was conscious of the fact that...
Novartis Ag and Anr Vs. Cipla Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:9. h January, 2015 % + I.A. No.24863/2014 IN CS(OS) 3812/2014 NOVARTIS AG & ANR Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Ms.Shilpa Arora & Mr.Talha Rahman, Advs. versus CIPLA LTD Through ..... Defendant Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Bitika Sharma, Ms.Anusuya Nigam & Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of patent no.222346 granted under The Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in favour of plaintiff No.1, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery-up etc. By this order I propose to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. Two plaintiffs have filed the present suit against Cipla Ltd. The plaintiff No.1 (the expression include...
Monsanto Holdings Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co. Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
H.R.Siddique Vs. Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$~R-21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:09. 01.2015 % CRL.A. 86/2009 H.R.SIDDIQUE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC along with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) read with provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) to assail the order dated 03.10.2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (Appellate Tribunal) in Appeal No.241/2005, whereby the appellants first appeal has been dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal, and the penalty imposed upon the appellant under Section 50 of the FERA in the adjudication order dated 28.01.2005 of Rs.1.5 Lakhs, has been sustained.2. One Dinesh Kumar Goel @ Titu was found to be engaged in receiving and s...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Usha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$ -8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 707/2011 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus USHA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. impugns a judgment dated 10.03.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.11,92,600/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1, 2 and 3 for the death of Pappu @ Puspender, who succumbed to fatal injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 23.08.2010.2. The appellants grievance is that the offer given by the Appellant Insurance Company as per the Claims Tribunals agreed procedure was not accepted by the claimants. The only option available to the Claims Tribunal was to proceed with the inquiry in respect of th...
Nandita Narain Vs. Delhi University and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2342/2014 9th January, 2015 % NANDITA NARAIN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Mathews, Advocate, Ms. Shikha Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Kartik Prasad, Advocate. VERSUS DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Senior Advocate with Mr. K. Vijeyekumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner who is a teacher of the respondent no.2-college and also a member of the governing body of the respondent no.2-college. In the writ petition, the following reliefs are prayed:(a) directing the Respondent No1 to intervene and ensure that the Respondents 2 to 4 function in accordance wi...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »