Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bir Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 306/2015 BIR PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Ms. Pratibha Gupta and Ms. Santwana, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1201.2015 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 10.10.2012 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (hereinafter referred to as CAT), whereby OA No.1594/2012 preferred by the petitioner has been partly allowed, and the respondents were directed to release the arrears of salary and allowance of the petitioner from 03.08.2009 to 14.2.2010 with interest at the rate as applicable to the GPF deposits till the date of actual payment.2. Mr. A. K Gautam, the learned Standing counsel appears on behalf of respondent on adv...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Chander Shekhar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 64/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. versus CHANDER SHEKHAR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14.10.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.14,42,826/- was awarded in favour of Respondent No.1 for having suffered serious injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 10.09.2005 at about 6:40 p.m. at Liyo Chowk, Konsewar Road, Rewari, Haryana. The compensation as computed in para 19 of the judgment is tabulated hereunder:Sl. Compensation under various heads No.1. Awarded by the Claims Tribunal (in Rs.) Compensation on account of pain and sufferings MAC. APP. No.64/2012 2.2. Compensation on account of medicines, medical treatments and...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Avdesh Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 163/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus AVDESH KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20.11.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.25,571/- was awarded in favour of Respondent No.1.2. The only ground of challenge raised is that the Appellant successfully proved the breach of the terms and conditions of the policy and therefore, recovery rights ought to have been granted. In this connection, it will be appropriate to refer to paras 16 and 17 of the impugned judgment where the Claims Tribunal held as under:-16. The driver of the offending vehicle has produced the driving licence to the police after the accident. The insurance comp...
Director of Income Tax International Taxation Vs. Ge Packaged Power In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
$~6 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :12. 01.2015 + ITA3522014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus GE PACKAGED POWER INC. ..... Respondent + ITA3532014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus M/S GE PACKAGED POWER INC. ..... Respondent + ITA3542014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus GE PACKAGED POWER INC ..... Respondent + ITA3552014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus GE PACKAGED POWER INC. ..... Respondent + ITA3562014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus GE PACKAGED POWER INC. ..... Respondent + ITA3572014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus ITA3522014 and connected matters Page 1 GE PACKAGED POWER INC ..... Respondent + ITA3582014 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant versus GE JENBACHER GMBH & CO. OHG ..... Respondent + ITA3592014 DIRECTOR O...
Mahavir Prasad Vs. Ved Bharat Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 425/2011 and CM No.19507/2011 Reserved on:6. h January, 2015 Decided on:9. h January, 2015 % MAHAVIR PRASAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shiv Charan Garg and Mr. Imran Khan, Advocates. versus VED BHARAT KAPOOR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arvind K. Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide the impugned judgment dated 1st April, 2011 the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short DRC Act) has been dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that three erroneous findings have been arrived at by the learned Trial Court: (i) Though in Para 15 (D2) learned Trial Court holds that the requirement of one room by the Petitioner for his another son i.e. Ravi who is residing in U.K. at present along with his family but visits the petitioner is not mala fide in view of the judgment reported as Brij Mohan Vs. Sri Pal Jain 1993 RLR190howeve...
M/S Moti Mahal Delux-Ii Vs. Kiran Dutta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 2/2015 and CM No.43/2014 (Stay) Reserved on:7. h January, 2015 % Decided on:9. h January, 2015 M/S MOTI MAHAL DELUX-II ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates. versus KIRAN DUTTA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi and Ms. Ekta Sukhramani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The grievance of the Petitioner to the order dated 3rd December, 2014 is to the extent that while allowing the amendment application and taking the amended petition on record the Rent Controller granted liberty to the Respondents to withdraw the relief of eviction on the ground of the bona fide requirement and file a fresh petition on the said ground.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Respondents herein filed a composite petition seeking the relief of eviction of tenanted premises under Section 14 (1) (a) and 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1...
Novartis Ag and Anr Vs. Cipla Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:9. h January, 2015 % + I.A. No.24863/2014 IN CS(OS) 3812/2014 NOVARTIS AG & ANR Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Ms.Shilpa Arora & Mr.Talha Rahman, Advs. versus CIPLA LTD Through ..... Defendant Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Bitika Sharma, Ms.Anusuya Nigam & Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of patent no.222346 granted under The Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in favour of plaintiff No.1, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery-up etc. By this order I propose to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. Two plaintiffs have filed the present suit against Cipla Ltd. The plaintiff No.1 (the expression include...
Sungro Seeds Ltd Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
Mahavir Prasad Vs. Ved Bharat Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 425/2011 and CM No.19507/2011 Reserved on:6. h January, 2015 Decided on:9. h January, 2015 % MAHAVIR PRASAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shiv Charan Garg and Mr. Imran Khan, Advocates. versus VED BHARAT KAPOOR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arvind K. Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide the impugned judgment dated 1st April, 2011 the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short DRC Act) has been dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that three erroneous findings have been arrived at by the learned Trial Court: (i) Though in Para 15 (D2) learned Trial Court holds that the requirement of one room by the Petitioner for his another son i.e. Ravi who is residing in U.K. at present along with his family but visits the petitioner is not mala fide in view of the judgment reported as Brij Mohan Vs. Sri Pal Jain 1993 RLR190howeve...
M/S Moti Mahal Delux-Ii Vs. Kiran Dutta and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 2/2015 and CM No.43/2014 (Stay) Reserved on:7. h January, 2015 % Decided on:9. h January, 2015 M/S MOTI MAHAL DELUX-II ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates. versus KIRAN DUTTA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi and Ms. Ekta Sukhramani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The grievance of the Petitioner to the order dated 3rd December, 2014 is to the extent that while allowing the amendment application and taking the amended petition on record the Rent Controller granted liberty to the Respondents to withdraw the relief of eviction on the ground of the bona fide requirement and file a fresh petition on the said ground.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Respondents herein filed a composite petition seeking the relief of eviction of tenanted premises under Section 14 (1) (a) and 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1...