Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S D.G. Exports Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 1365/2014 & CM No.2834/2014 M/S D.G. EXPORTS ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr S. Venkatesh, Ms Deepika Kalia, Mr Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr Kapis Seth. For the Respondents : Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms Mahima Bahl. Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Sumit Gaur for R-3 & 4. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a circular dated 04.12.2008 being circular No.45 (RE-08)/2004-2009 (hereafter impugned circular) issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade (hereafter the DGFT) whereby the DGFT has proscribed export of goods, which are apparently in the nature of military stores, without a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Department of Defence Production and Supplies, Ministry of Defence (hereafter DoDP).2. According to t...
Balbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 07, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2925/2013 BALBIR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Trivedi and Mr.Ashok K.Vij, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Kumar Rout, Pairvi Officer, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the representative of the Department.2. Claiming to be born on October 08, 1950 and enrolled as a Constable (GD) in CRPF on August 12, 1969 the petitioner was served with a charge of memo on March 09, 2001 alleging against him that in the character certificate which he had submitted when he took employment and with respect to which character certificate, the department accepted the date of birth as indicated thereon, the petitioner interpolated the year of his birth by changing 1953 into 1950. It was alleged that the same was a serious offence.3. ...
Rajender Thr. Parokar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on : December 22, 2014 Pronounced on : January 07, 2015 CRL.A.713/2012 RAJENDER THR. PAROKAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari and Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajbir Malik, SHO PS Najafgarh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R.K.GAUBA, J.1. The appellant faced trial in sessions case No.83/2011, on conclusion of which he was found guilty and convicted for offences punishable under sections 302 and 498A of Indian Penal Code (IPC) vide judgment dated March 14, 2012 passed by Sh.Virender Bhat, Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka. Vide order on sentence passed on March 17, 2012 the learned trial court awarded imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under section 302 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under section 498A IPC. ...
Ascent Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. No.15 of 2014 ASCENT CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Khattar and Mr. Tileshwar Prasad, Advocates. versus PARSVNATH BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vijay Nair with Mr. Rajat Joneja and Ms. Neeharika Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER701.2015 1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Ascent Construction Private Ltd. (ACPL) seeking reference of the disputes that has arisen between the parties to arbitration.2. The background to the present petition is that the Respondent Parsvnath Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (PBPL), a subsidiary of Parsvnath Developers Limited, entered into an agreement dated 10th May 2011 with ACPL for execution of certain works at Parsvnath Exotica, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP. The value of the contract on the basis of the bill of quantity was Rs. 21,70,76,177. Clause 4.7.2.1 of the 'conditions of contract', which w...
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Hans Raj and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 530/2011 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shomik Mazumdar, Advocate versus HANS RAJ & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23.02.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.1,10,206/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum was awarded in favour of Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 10.10.2009 at 9:40 p.m. on account of the rash and negligent driving of delivery van bearing no.DL-1LL-1103 by its driver (Respondent Devender Kapoor).2. There is twin challenge to the judgment. First, that the compensation awarded is on the higher side and second, that since breach of the terms and conditions of the policy was established, the Appellant ou...
Ajay Gautam Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h January, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.112/2015 .. Petitioner AJAY GAUTAM Through: Petitioner in person. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC & Ms. Pallavi Shali, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Zubeda Begum & Ms. Sana Ansari, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal with Mr. Sidharth Chopra & Ms. Savni Dutt, Advs. for R-4 to R-6. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks a restraint on the exhibition of the Hindi feature film / movie titled PK, whether it be in movie theaters or on the television, on the ground of the same hurting the religious sentiments of all the communities and mainly of Hindus and thereby violating the rights of Hindus under Articles 19(2) and 25 of the Constitution of India.2. It is the case of the...
Rev. Dr. Fr. Jose Aikara Vs. Council for the Indian School Certificate ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8567/2014 7th January, 2015 % REV. DR. FR. JOSE AIKARA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate with Mr. Achint Singh Gyani, Advocate. VERSUS COUNCIL FOR THE INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.K. Das, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Das, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. N.L. Ganapathi, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Das, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocate for respondent No.7. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.228-29/2015 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.8567/2014 and C.M. No.227/2015 (stay) 2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...
S.P. Yadav and Ors. Vs. Lok Sabha and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.162/2013 7th January, 2015 % S.P. YADAV AND ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. K. Venkatraman, Advocate. VERSUS LOK SABHA & Anr. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by four petitioners seeking relief that they ought to have been appointed as Security Assistants Grade-I (SAG-I) employees with the respondent no.1 and not as Security Assistant Grade-II (SAG-II). This writ petition was filed in the year 2013 and reliefs which are sought are of notional appointment to the posts of SAG-I in terms of a selection process which admittedly took place way back in the year 2002. Not only the writ petition is filed after about 11 years, petitioners have in fact worked at the posts of SAG-II from ...
the Commissioner of Income Tax Xiii Vs. Manoj Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~25 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. 01.2015 + ITA5782008 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XIII Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Rohit Madan and Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Advs. versus MANOJ BANSAL Through + ..... Respondent Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Vikas Jain and Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advs. ITA5822008 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XIII Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Rohit Madan and Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Advs. versus RADHEY SHYAM BANSAL Through + ..... Respondent Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Vikas Jain and Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advs. ITA5832008 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XIII Through ITA Nos.578/2008, 582/2008 & 583/2008 ..... Appellant Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr. Rohit Madan and Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Advs. Page 1 versus SUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Vikas Jain and Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The pre...
Gaurav Jain Vs. Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust (H
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P(C) No.139/2015 & CM No.218/2015 (stay) 7th January, 2015 % GAURAV JAIN ......Petitioner Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Sumitha S. and Ms. Harsha, Advocates. Through: VERSUS HINDUSTAN LATEX FAMILY PLANNING PROMOTION TRUST (HLFPPT) & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohit Abraham, Mr. Arvind Ray and Ms. Shruti Dutt, Advocates for R1. Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocates for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, who was an employee of the respondent no.1/employer/Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust (HLFPPT), impugning the order of the employer dated 20.11.2014 by which the services of the petitioner were terminated pursuant to the report dated 17.11.2014 of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) which indicted the petitioner f...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »