Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Babu Lal Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~39 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 808/2014 Decided on 7th January, 2015 BABU LAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Jha Kamal, Adv. Versus STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Charu Dalal, Adv. along with IO ASI Jagpal, P.S. DIU West Distt. Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv. for R-2 & R-3. AND W.P.(CRL) 874/2014 RAGHUNATH SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Jha Kamal, Adv. Versus THE STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Addl. Standing Counsel with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. along with ASI Jagpal Singh, DIU West Distt. Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv. for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Both the writ petitions arise from the same FIR, thus, are disposed of together by this common order.2. By way of present writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), petitioners hav...
Shiv Charan Lal Sharma Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8158/2013 & C.M.No.17218/2013 (for directions) 7th January, 2015 SHIV CHARAN LAL SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Darpan Wadhwa with Mr.Nikhil Singhvi and Ms.Nidhi Mohan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner who is an aspirant to the post of the Presiding Officer of the National Highways Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) formed under the Control of National Highways (Land & Traffic) Act, 2002.2. The appointment of the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal is governed by the National Highways Tribunal (Procedure for appointment as Presiding Officer of the Tribunal) Rules, 2003 (in short the Rules). The relevant rule in this regard dealing with the procedure and method of appoint...
Ram Saroop Vs. Dhanni Devi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~A-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 07.01.2015 + CS(OS) 2701/2014 RAM SAROOP Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sohit Chaudhary, Advs. versus DHANNI DEVI AND OTHERS ..... Defendant Through Mr.Deepak Jain, Adv. for D-1 to D-3 Mr.B.N.Gupta, Adv. for D-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.17125/2014 (For amendment of plaint and impleadment of D-4) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking possession, declaration, damages and mesne profits and other reliefs pertaining to property bearing No.WZ-4, built on plot No.10 admeasuring 45 sq.yds out of 289.5 sq.yds. out of Khasra No.232 and 233, Khewat No.137/413, situated in the approved colony known as Ashoka Park Extn., Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi. Defendant No.1 is the mother of the plaintiff and defendant No.3 is the brother. Defendant No.2 is the wife of defendant No.3.2. As per the plaint the plaintiff and defendant No.3 are the sons of late Shri Bishna Ram. The said Shri Bishna Ra...
Jeet Ram and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 86/2015 JEET RAM & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER0701.2015 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.136/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.86/2015 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners seek to challenge the impugned order dated 11.08.2014, passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as CAT), whereby the O.A. filed by them was dismissed.2. In the present case, the Petitioners were appointed on the post of Constable in Secretariat Security Force (SSF) and retire...
Pepsico Inc and Anr Vs. Vomara Distributors and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
$~A-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:07. 01.2015 CS(OS) 1607/2013 PEPSICO INC & ANR Through ..... Plaintiff Ms.Bitika Sharma & Mr.Kapil Midha, Advs. versus VOMARA DISTRIBUTORS & ORS Through None. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. Arguments have been heard in the suit. On 13.01.2014, Defendant nos. 1 and 2 sought some more time to resolve the dispute and prayed for a short adjournment. On the next date of hearing, vide order dated 01.04.2014 the defendants were proceeded ex-parte as the defendants did not give any proposal for settling the matter despite the order dated 13.01.2014.2. The present suit relates to the plaintiffs registered trade mark AQUAFINA, including packaging/writing style/logo and the illegal adoption and use by defendants of a virtually identical trademark/trade dress/label/logo form AQUAFIZZA for identical products i.e. packaged drinking water.3. It is the contention of the plaintiff that...
Ravi Saran Vs. The Cooperative Store Ltd., Super Bazar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 06, 2015 + W.P. (C) No.5907/2012 RAVI SARAN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus THE COOPERATIVE STORE LTD., SUPER BAZAR .... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is directed against the award dated 03.09.2005 whereby ld. Industrial Adjudicator in I.D. No.754/2004 (Old I.D. No.318/1991) held that the termination of services of the petitioner was legal and justified and, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.2. The present petition is also directed against the order dated 11.12.2002 passed by the ld. Industrial Adjudicator, whereby it was held that the enquiry conducted was legal, fair, proper and in accordance with the principles of natural justice.3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner joined the respondent Establishment as a Sweeper in the year 1966 and h...
Jai Narain and Ors. Vs. The Collector (North West) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 06, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.9128/2008 JAI NARAIN & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.K.Gupta, Advocate. Versus THE COLLECTOR (NORTH WEST ) & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Standing Counsel with Mr. M.K. Vikkey, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Anil Kaushik and Mr. Pradeep K.B., Advocate for Respondents No.3 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order dated 12.12.2008 passed by the respondent No.1 in Case No.24/DC/NW/2005 and directions, thereby directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to allot Plot No.304 in favour of the petitioners.2. Brief facts of the case are that Scheme for consolidation of land of Village Khera Khurd was framed during the period 1973-75. In the year 1974, father of the petitioners No.1 and 3 to 7, namely, late Shri Ram Murti (to be referred as Predecessor-in...
Karuna Gupta (Senior Citizen) Vs. Sh.Balvinder Kumar, Vice Chairman, D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.712/2014 Decided on :6. h January, 2015 KARUNA GUPTA (SENIOR CITIZEN) Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ajay Kumar Gupta, Adv. Versus SH.BALVINDER KUMAR, VICE CHAIRMAN, DDA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv.for DDA. Mr.D.N.Goburdhun and Mr.Hemant Phalpher, Advs.for Applicants in No.20346/2014. Raj CM CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.CM No.20346/20141) This order shall dispose of CM No.20346/2014 by virtue of which impleadment of the applicants in the present contempt proceedings as well as recall of the order dated 19.11.2014 is sought. The aforesaid application was heard pursuant to allowing the application of the applicant being CM No.20863/2014 as the learned counsel for the applicant stated that there is an impending threat of demolition of the property in question i.e. Flat No.100, A4, Priyadarshini Apartments, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.2) Before dealing with the submissions of the learned counse...
Baroda Road Tankers and Anr. Vs. Deputy General Manager - Lpg North Zo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 12.2014 Pronounced on:06. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 8776/2014, C.M. NOS.20152-20153/2014 BARODA ROAD TANKERS & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER-LPG NORTH ZONE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 8435/2014, C.M. NO.19492/2014 MR. RAJESH MALIK & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8568/2014, C.M. NOS. 19774/2014 & 20119/2014 M/S. THAKUR BALWAN SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Yashank Adhyaru, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Naman Joshi, Advocate, for petitioners in Item No.2. Sh. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, for UOI in Item No.2. W.P.(C) 8776/14, 8568/14 & 8435/14 Page 1 Sh. Rajat Navet with Sh. Kushagra Pandit and Sh. Rohan Yadav, Advocates, for IOC/BPCL in Item Nos. 2 to 4. Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rahul Shukla, Advocates, for petitioner in Item No.4. Sh. Rikesh Singh and Sh. Nakul Pathania, ...
Pramod Ramjee Sahare Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % 10.09.2014 06.01.2015 W.P.(C) 43/2014 PRAMOD RAMJEE SAHARE ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand & Mr.Prateek Tushan Mohanty, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 18.07.2013 passed in O.A. No.3551/2011 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal), whereby the Tribunal disallowed his said original application. The Petitioner had sought to assail the adverse entries in his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08 and had sought a direction that these entries be ignored by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for consideration of his promotion to the Functiona...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »