Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nirmal Kumar Vs. M/S Tommy Hilfiger Licensing Llc and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2015 % + LPA No.9/2015 NIRMAL KUMAR Through: .... Appellant Mr. Kamal Kishore Arora with Mr. Gaurav Arora & Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advs. Versus M/S TOMMY HILFIGER LICENSING LLC & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. for R-3&4. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 29th September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing the application of the respondent No.2 M/s Tommy Hilfiger Licensing BV to be substituted as a petitioner in W.P.(C) No.826/2014 originally filed by the respondent No.1 M/s Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC, as well as of allowing the said writ petition.2. Having gone through the paper book and being prima facie of the opinion that the order of the learned Single Judge requires no interference, we have heard the counsel for the appellant at length on...
Dr. Amit Chakrapani Vs. Dav College Managing Committee and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7606/2014 & C.M.No.17918/2014 (stay) 9th January, 2015 DR. AMIT CHAKRAPANI Through versus ..... Petitioner Mr.Asish Nischal, Advocate. DAV COLLEGE MANAGING COMMITTEE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.B.K.Khurana with Mr.Gaurav Malik, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Inspite of a catena of judgments of the Supreme Court, as well as this Court, that when departmental enquiry commences, the charged employee cannot rush to the court for seeking quashing of the charges inasmuch as merits of the issues are determined at the conclusion of the enquiry by the departmental authority, however, certain litigants in order to delay and drag the departmental enquiries, do this, one such person being the petitioner against whom article of charges have been issued with respect to financial misappropriation running into lacs of rupees.2. With respect to the aspect that th...
Eastern Economist Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2015. + W.P.(C) No.151/2015, CM No.245/2015 CM No.246/2015 (for exemption) (for stay) and EASTERN ECONOMIST LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Salyendra Kumar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Nidhi Raman & Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advs. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks declaration of the second proviso to Section 3(a) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), inter alia providing that only an Officer of the Statutory Authority concerned shall be appointed as an Estate Officer in respect of the public premises controlled by that Authority, as ultra vires. The petition also claims certain other and ancillary reliefs.2. For conspectus of the matter, it may be stated tha...
Mohd. Sadiq Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 315/1999 Judgment dated 9th January, 2015 % MOHD. SADIQ . APPELLANT Through : Mr. Javed Ahmed, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI .. RESPONDENT Through : Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State with SI Yash Pal, PS Chandani Mahal CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Present appeal filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment dated 15.05.1999 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Delhi, by which the appellant has been directed to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, is as under :Prosecution case as per chargesheet disclosed that on 03.06.1996 vide DD No.2A, Ins./SHO Chanderkant ...
Shyam Lal Mittal Vs. Sarla Mittal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.28/2007 Decided on :9. h January, 2015 + SHYAM LAL MITTAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashok Sapra, Adv. versus SARLA MITTAL & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Applicant in person No.17823/2014. in CM CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.17823/2014 (u/O1Rule 10 CPC) 1. This is an application filed by the brother of the respondent No.1/plaintiff (since deceased) for being impleaded as a party to the present appeal.2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that he is the brother of respondent No.1/plaintiff and as the respondent No.1/plaintiff Smt.Sarla Mittal has died and there is a will purported to have been made by her in respect of the property in question in his favour, therefore, he may be brought on record by allowing the present application for impleadment.3. I have considered the submission and have also gone through the record.4. The applicant cannot be permitted to be impleaded as a p...
Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd. Vs. Faheem Baig and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:9. h January, 2015. + LPA No.8/2015, CM No.385/2015 (for condonation of 17 days delay in filing the appeal) INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION CO. LTD. ............ Appellant Through: Mr. A.S. Dateer, Adv. Versus FAHEEM BAIG & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 13th August, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of CM No.13032/2012 under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed by the appellant in Cont. Cas.(C) No.484/2011 filed by the respondent no.3 herein i.e. Ajmera Steel Pvt. Ltd. against the officers of the appellant. This appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay of 17 days in filing thereof and is listed subject to office objection as to the maintainability thereof.2. As far as the aspect of maintainability of...
Iqbal Gazi and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h January, 2015 +CRL.A.1045/2013 & Crl.M.A.12384/2013 & 16243/2013 IQBAL GAZI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. D.B. Goswami, Mr. Ritesh Bahri, Mr. S. Gaurav Sasan and Mr. Randeep Kumar Rehan, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State along with Mr. Shiv Anand Mishra, ACP & Insp. Anand Sagar, PS Seelampur Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Present appeal under Section 12 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred as MCOCA) r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred challenging the order dated 29th July, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby on the application moved by the complainant under Section 9 of the MCOCA r/w Section 319 Cr.P.C., FIR was ordered to be registered against the appellants.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that ...
Smt. Balwant Kaur Vs. Director of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7418/2014 9th January, 2015 % SMT. BALWANT KAUR Through: ......Petitioner Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. VERSUS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms.Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.R.K.Kapoor with Ms.S.Rama, Advocates for R-2. Mr.Sudhanshu Tomar, Advocate for R3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is a Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) with the respondent no.2/school, seeks quashing of the recommendation dated 14.10.2014 made by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) appointing the respondent no.3 as the principal of the respondent no.2/school. The petitioner claims that the respondent no.3 has been wrongly appointed and the petitioner ought to have been appointed but has wrongly not been appointed by considering the bench mark for appo...
Sh. Aakash Deep Chakravarti Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.209/2015 & CM No.331/2015 (stay) 9th January , 2015 % SH. AAKASH DEEP CHAKRAVARTI ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Shankar Raju, Adv. and Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. J.S.Bhasin, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Pratima Gupta, standing counsel and Ms. Anshul Garg, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner seeking the relief of quashing of the fresh advertisement issued for appointment to the post of Executive Director (Law) (in short ED (Law)) of the respondent no.2/Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) and also for setting aside the impugned order dated 11.11.2014 of respondent no.2 whereby respondent no.2 put a hold on the appointment of the petitioner to the post of ED (Law) in the respondent no.2. The subsequ...
M/S Xerox Modi Corp Ltd. Vs. The Special Director, Enforcement Directo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2015
$~R-12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 01.2015 CRL.A. 300/2009 M/S XEROX MODI CORP LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vijay Nair & Ms. Neeharika Aggarwal, Advocates. versus THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vineet Malhotra, Mr. Vishal Gohri & Mr. Jitender, Advocates for respondent/ ED. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. At the commencement of the hearing today, learned counsel for the respondent has sought to urge the preliminary objection taken by it in its reply, namely to the territorial jurisdiction of this Court to deal with the present appeal.2. In this regard, reference is made to Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, which provides that Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court ... ... ... ... .... In the explanation, the term High Court has been defined to mean (a) the High Court ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »