Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G L Sharma Vs. Hemant Kishor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h January, 2015 + CRL.A.1400/2011 & Crl.M.A. 4777/2014 G L SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj and Mr. Ravinder, Advocates along with Appellant in person Versus HEMANT KISHOR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Vikash Chandra and Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocates CRL.A. 1401/2011 & CRL. M.A. 4776/2014 G L SHARMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. K.K. Manan, Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj and Mr. Ravinder, Advocates along with Appellant in person. versus SHOBHA SAXENA Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Vikash Chandra and Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Vide this common judgment, I shall dispose of two appeals bearing Crl.A.No.1400/2011 and 1401/2011 as both the appeals have been filed by an unsuccessful complainant in case relating to offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act) against the respondents who are moth...
the New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Naresh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 79/2006 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus NARESH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Nemo. . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. I have perused the order dated 07.11.2014 passed by the Registrar (Original). Respondent no.5 has failed to put in appearance despite service through publication in the newspaper Statesman. Respondent no.5 is thus, proceeded ex-parte.2. By virtue of this appeal, the Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited seeks recovery of the compensation(from the owner of the vehicle) paid to the legal heirs of the deceased Sri Krishan, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 02.03.1995 at 1:50 a.m. while deceased Sri Krishan was driving a taxi bearing no.DLT6547 which was hit by a truck bearing registration No.DEL5539 which was being driven by Puran Singh in a rash and negligent man...
the. Commissioner ofincometax-Iv Vs. M/S Denso India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~31 & 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h January, 2015 + + ITA7672014 ITA7962014 THE. COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX-IV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balbir Singh, Adv. versus M/S DENSO INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.C.S.Aggarwal, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The revenue has preferred the present appeals against the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 27.02.2013 in ITA No.3014/Del./ 2009 (for Assessment Year 2002-03) and ITA No.887/Del./2010 (for Assessment year 2003-04). It urges that the Court should consider the following substantial question of law:1. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT is correct in confirming the order of Ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of Royalty paid by the Assessee to its parent Company by treating the same as Capital in nature?. ITA767&796/2014...
the. Commissioner ofincometax-Iv Vs. M/S Denso India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~31 & 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h January, 2015 + + ITA7672014 ITA7962014 THE. COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX-IV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balbir Singh, Adv. versus M/S DENSO INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.C.S.Aggarwal, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The revenue has preferred the present appeals against the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 27.02.2013 in ITA No.3014/Del./ 2009 (for Assessment Year 2002-03) and ITA No.887/Del./2010 (for Assessment year 2003-04). It urges that the Court should consider the following substantial question of law:1. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT is correct in confirming the order of Ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of Royalty paid by the Assessee to its parent Company by treating the same as Capital in nature?. ITA767&796/2014...
Babu Mandal Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1571/2011 Date of decision:13. 01.2015 ..... Appellant BABU MANDAL Through Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. With Mr.Narsingh Narain Rai & Ms. Neha Singh, Advs. versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the state. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The appellant Babu Mandal stands convicted by the impugned judgment dated 21.07.2011 for having committed murder of Rinku Mandal aged about 8 years in the night intervening 13 and 14th of September, 2009.2. The prosecution relies upon circumstantial evidence and there is no eyewitness to the commission of the said offence.3. The undisputed and accepted factual position is that the dead body of Rinku Mandal with injuries was found at about 6.30-7.00 a.m. on 14.09.2009 at a distance of 25-30 yards from her residence in the jungle. This factum is deposed by Ruma Mandal (PW-7) mother and Bablu Man...
Geeta and Ors. Vs. Dinesh Chander and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP.23/2013 GEETA & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus DINESH CHANDER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Ray, Adv. with Mr. Amitava Poddar, Adv. For R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of this appeal, the Appellants seek enhancement of compensation of Rs.13,32,672/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) to the Appellants (the Claimants) for the death of Raj Kumar, who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 01.03.2010.2. In the absence of any appeal filed by the Insurance Company, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. Evidence was led before the Claims Tribunal that the deceased was an income tax assessee. At the same time, the Claims Tribunal opined that the business of the deceaseds proprietorship firm is still being carried out in as much as now the brother of the de...
Om Prakash Vs. Inspector General/N.S. and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 06, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 12, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2884/2005 OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus INSPECTOR GENERAL/N.S. AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Inderjit Singh, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 2438/2006 RATAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Geeta Sharma and Mr.Ujjwal Jain, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 19649/2005 PREM SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chandan Kumar, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The challenge in these writ petitions is to the final orders dated November 07, 2003 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and orders passed by the Appellate Authority whereby the penalty of removal from service imposed on all the three petit...
Ratan Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 06, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 12, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2884/2005 OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus INSPECTOR GENERAL/N.S. AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Inderjit Singh, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 2438/2006 RATAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Geeta Sharma and Mr.Ujjwal Jain, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 19649/2005 PREM SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chandan Kumar, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The challenge in these writ petitions is to the final orders dated November 07, 2003 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and orders passed by the Appellate Authority whereby the penalty of removal from service imposed on all the three petit...
Prem Singh Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 06, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : January 12, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2884/2005 OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus INSPECTOR GENERAL/N.S. AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Inderjit Singh, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 2438/2006 RATAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: None versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Geeta Sharma and Mr.Ujjwal Jain, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 19649/2005 PREM SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chandan Kumar, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The challenge in these writ petitions is to the final orders dated November 07, 2003 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and orders passed by the Appellate Authority whereby the penalty of removal from service imposed on all the three petit...
Anand Chaturvedi and Ors. Vs. Pravesh Chaturvedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. No.1298 of 2014 ANAND CHATURVEDI & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Sandeep Phogat and Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advocates. versus PRAVESH CHATURVEDI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1201.2015 1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking interim reliefs prior to the commencement of the arbitration proceedings.2. The Respondent Pravesh Chaturvedi is admittedly the owner of the property at H-39/8, DLF Phase I, Gurgaon, measuring 200 square yards. Petitioners 1 to 4 are the partners of M/s. Apoorv Builders a partnership firm (Petitioner No.5) engaged in the field of building construction and related works, having its registered office in Bhopal.3. The Petitioners approached the Respondent for development of the aforementioned plot belonging to the Respondent. In terms of the collaboration agreement dated 1st September...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »