Delhi Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cpwd Mazdoor Union (Regd) Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7219/2012 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS, CPWD ..... Petitioner versus SUSHIL KUMAR & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr V. K. Tandon. For the Respondents : Mr R. K. Kapoor and Mr S. Rama for respondents. Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for respondent/UOI. + AND W.P.(C) 14846/2004 & CM No.10601/2004 CPWD MAZDOOR UNION (REGD) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Varun Prasad. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for respondent/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The Writ Petition (W.P.(C) No.7219/2012) has been filed by the Director General (Works), CPWD seeking quashing of order dated 25.06.2012 passed by the Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) (hereafter...
Director General of Works, Cpwd Vs. Sushil Kumar and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7219/2012 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS, CPWD ..... Petitioner versus SUSHIL KUMAR & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr V. K. Tandon. For the Respondents : Mr R. K. Kapoor and Mr S. Rama for respondents. Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for respondent/UOI. + AND W.P.(C) 14846/2004 & CM No.10601/2004 CPWD MAZDOOR UNION (REGD) ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Varun Prasad. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for respondent/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The Writ Petition (W.P.(C) No.7219/2012) has been filed by the Director General (Works), CPWD seeking quashing of order dated 25.06.2012 passed by the Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) (hereafter...
Lajjawati Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 6352/2014 & CM153252014 LAJJAWATI ... Petitioner versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Sumit Bansal with Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi : Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with Mr T.P. Singh : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Pawan Mathur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1...
Lalta Devi and Anr. Vs. Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:12. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 189/2014 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate Versus SMT LALTA DEVI & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate MAC.APP. 640/2014 LALTA DEVI & ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Respondent no.1 insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. MITTAL, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 08.10.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.19,50,000/- was awarded to the parents of the deceased Aditya who had lost his life in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 19.06.2011 at 10:40 a.m. near Village Bhatipur, Luxor Road, Haridwar, Uttrakhand.2. MAC APP.189/2014 is preferred by the HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited (the...
Shashi Kher and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 6612/2014 and CM No.15724/2014 ... Petitioners SHASHI KHER & ORS versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : : : : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur, Ms Richa Oberoi Mr Vikram Jetly for UOI Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Pawan Mathur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) ...
Manju Sharma @ Maya Devi Vs. Kalawati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 436/2013 & CMs. 18963/2013 & 2970/2014 (stay) Decided on:12. h January, 2015 % MANJU SHARMA @ MAYA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. G.P. Thareja, Adv. versus KALAWATI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 2nd August, 2013 whereby leave to defend application filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. Eviction petition was filed by the respondent claiming herself to be the owner of a shop admeasuring 7 x 9 ft. situated at the ground floor of premises No.1/3215, Mandoli Road, Shahdara, Delhi-110032. In the eviction petition, the respondent claims that she was the owner of the premises wherein four shops had been constructed. One shop had been sold by her around 10 years ago and the other in the year 2008 for her bona fide needs. Thereafter, the respondent was left with two shops one of which was given in tenancy to the pe...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Smt Lalta Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:12. h January, 2015 + MAC.APP. 189/2014 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate Versus SMT LALTA DEVI & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate MAC.APP. 640/2014 LALTA DEVI & ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Respondent no.1 insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. MITTAL, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 08.10.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs.19,50,000/- was awarded to the parents of the deceased Aditya who had lost his life in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 19.06.2011 at 10:40 a.m. near Village Bhatipur, Luxor Road, Haridwar, Uttrakhand.2. MAC APP.189/2014 is preferred by the HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited (the...
Reena Suri Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 6698/2014 and CM No.15892/2014 ... Petitioner REENA SURI versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3&4 : : : : Mr Ajay Sharma Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with Mr T.P. Singh Mr Pawan Mathur Mr Siddharth Panda CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 & 4 has handed over the counter affidavit on behalf of the said respondent. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file a rejoinder inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and...
Chammi Begum (Thr Its Attorney Vs. Noor Bano and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
4# $ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1125/2014 and CM No.21323/2014 Decided on:12. h January, 2015 % CHAMMI BEGUM (THR ITS ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY MRS SHAHIDA AQEEL) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Pankaj Aggarwal, Advocate with Mrs.Shahida Aqueel, Petitioner in person. versus NOOR BANO & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The Plaintiff Chammi Begum filed the suit through Smt. Shahida Aqueel, her attorney seeking permanent injunction and restraint from dispossessing the Plaintiff/ Petitioner from the suit premises bearing Municipal No.1237-1238, Haveli Hissamuddin, Bali Maran, Delhi against Noor Bano, Asfia Shees and Afsha Saeed. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21st April, 2014 whereby the right of the Petitioner as Plaintiff to lead evidence was closed and the order dated 10th November, 2014 whereby the review petition was dismissed.2. Before dealing with the issue whether the right to lead ...
Babu Lal Yadav Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 12, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1943/2013 BABU LAL YADAV Represented by: ..... Petitioner Sunil Narula, Advocate with Ms.Isha Thakur, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated December 15, 2011 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal in OA No.04/2009, wherein the Tribunal had dismissed the said Original Application, holding that no interference was warranted as there was no infirmity or illegality in the pre-mature discharge of the petitioner from service.2. The brief facts relevant for adjudication of the present petition are that the petitioner was enrolled in the army on January 11, 1999 as Sepoy (Infantry). Upon successfully completing his training the petitioner was posted to 11 Kumaon Regime...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »