Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 17 of about 1,333 results (0.025 seconds)Hi-Speed Movers Pvt Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3474/2012 & & CM No.12289/2013 HI-SPEED MOVERS PVT LTD. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Gurpreeet Singh Sethi, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Mr. Arush Bhandari, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.Ajit Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 3474/2012 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the award dated 21.03.2012 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.260/2009 and LIR No.245/2011.2. Vide order dated 30.05.2012 passed in C.M. No.7326/2012, this Court stayed the reinstatement of the respondent No.2/workman, however, declined to stay the operation of the impugned award directing the payment of back wages to the respondent No.2 on the ground that no irreparable loss is going to...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Mohan Sharma and Ors Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + + $~1 & 12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27.11.2014 MAC.APP. 661/2014 SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate MAC.APP. 848/2011 & CM No.17637/2011 (stay) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate Through: versus SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER % 27.11.2014 JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. These are two appeals filed by the appellant against the award dated 04.06.2011. MAC. APP. No.848/2011 is filed by the Insurance Company seeking recovery rights against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. MAC APP No.661/2014 has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The brief facts are that on 31.03.2007 the claimant Surinder Mohan Sharma was travelling in a bus. When the bus rea...
Tag this Judgment!Sunder Singh and Anr Vs. State (Govt. of Nct)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1097 of 2014 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 10282, 10283 of 2014 (for suspension of sentences) Reserved on: November 24, 2014 Delivered on: November 27, 2014 SUNDER SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sundeshwar Lal with Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 3rd June 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Session Case No.18 of 2011 arising out of FIR No.304 of 2010 registered at Police Station (PS) Geeta Colony, Delhi convicting the Appellants, Sunder Singh and Vinod, for the offence under Sections 304 (Part-II), 323 and 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 7th June 2014 whereby both of them were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) of five years with fine of Rs.10,000 each and in default, to undergo six months SI...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Madan and Anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:27th November, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 3599/2014 MANISH MADAN & ANR. Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: .....Respondent Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assailing the order dated 24.07.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the Criminal Revision bearing C.R. No.135/14 was dismissed.2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that on 23.04.2005 complainant Mr. Hemant Bishnoi, Chief Manager (Shopping), India Times lodged a complaint stating that on 12.04.2005 one Ravi Arora placed an order for purchase of 256 MB SD card worth Rs.38,400/(Rupees Thirty eight thousand four hundred) and on the same day he had als...
Tag this Judgment!Love Aggarwal and Ors Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan and Ors Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii Vs. Jubilant Securities Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 27, 2014 ITA4902014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Madan,Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advs. versus JUBILANT SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Through: + ..... Respondent Ms.Kavita Jha, Adv. ITA4912014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Madan,Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advs. versus JUBILANT SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Kavita Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. These two appeals filed by the revenue pertain to the Assessment Year 2009-10 and arise out of one order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal in short) dated 09.01.2014. The revenue has possibly preferred two appeals as two cross appeals were disposed by the Tribunal by the said impugned order.2. Two issues have been raised in t...
Tag this Judgment!Suraj and Ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~43 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4354/2014 SURAJ & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 4340/2014 SUNIL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. Both these petitions seek quashing of FIR No.481/2014 under Sections 308/147/323/148/324/149/34 IPC; and FIR No.483/2014 under Sections 147/148/149/323/...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax officer
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.137/2003 Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 PAWAN KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Aseem Swaroop and Ms. Suvarna Kashyap, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocate for Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. 59/2003 This is an application for stay. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-assessee states that he is not pressing the stay application. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. ITA No.137/2003 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by the appellant-assessee Pawan Kumar Aggarwal impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 17th September, 2002, relating to the genuineness of the gift of Rs....
Tag this Judgment!Geyir Potom Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!