Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Sunil and ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
$~43 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4354/2014 SURAJ & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 4340/2014 SUNIL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. Both these petitions seek quashing of FIR No.481/2014 under Sections 308/147/323/148/324/149/34 IPC; and FIR No.483/2014 under Sections 147/148/149/323/...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shish Pal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
$~A-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2014 + CM(M). 922/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. versus SHISH PAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Tribunal dismissing the application of the petitioner for directions to refund of Rs.50,000/- plus interest totalling Rs.55,162/- paid as per the order of the Tribunal dated 27.07.2006 in exercise of power under Section 140 of the M.V. Act on account of an alleged accident that had taken place on 30.04.1999 wherein it was alleged that Smt.Gasna Devi had expired in the said accident.2. Subsequently the Tribunal passed an award on 25.02.2012 holding that the death of Smt. Gasna Devi was not as a consequence of any motor accident. The Tribunal held that she died due to natural causes inasmuch as she was seri...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Mohan Sharma and ors Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
* + + $~1 & 12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27.11.2014 MAC.APP. 661/2014 SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate MAC.APP. 848/2011 & CM No.17637/2011 (stay) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate Through: versus SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER % 27.11.2014 JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. These are two appeals filed by the appellant against the award dated 04.06.2011. MAC. APP. No.848/2011 is filed by the Insurance Company seeking recovery rights against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. MAC APP No.661/2014 has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The brief facts are that on 31.03.2007 the claimant Surinder Mohan Sharma was travelling in a bus. When the bus rea...
Tag this Judgment!Suraj and ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
$~43 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4354/2014 SURAJ & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 4340/2014 SUNIL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. Both these petitions seek quashing of FIR No.481/2014 under Sections 308/147/323/148/324/149/34 IPC; and FIR No.483/2014 under Sections 147/148/149/323/...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Alpana Khandhway and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2014
$~A-14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 957/2011 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates. versus ALPANA KHANDHWAY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-6. + MAC.APP. 1092/2011 ALPANA KANDHWAY & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate versus BAJRANJ BALI TRANSPORT CO & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates for R-4. + MAC.APP. 991/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate. versus ALPANA KHANDHWAY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NA...
Tag this Judgment!Suraj Seth Vs. Ruchika Abbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:26. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 2902/2014 SURAJ SETH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Jagat Singh, Adv. with Mr. Bhagat Singh, Adv. versus RUCHIKA ABBI Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Anil Malhotra, Adv. with Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Adv. and Defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. Mittal, J.(Oral) IA No.19884/2014 (O.VII Rule 11 CPC) in CS(OS) 2902/2014 1. This suit for declaration and injunction has been filed by the Plaintiff primarily seeking ante suit injunction. The Plaintiff is the husband of the Defendant. As per the averments made in the plaint, the parties got married in January, 2001 at New Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies.2. According to the Plaintiff, after the marriage, the parties stayed at Virginia, USA. They were blessed with a baby girl on 24.12.2007. Certain averments have been made about the ill habits of the Defendant in para 4 and other paragraphs of the plaint which are not very releva...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Bhagat Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi, Department of Transport and An
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2014. + W.P.(C) 6825/2014 AMIT BHAGAT + ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupender Pratap Singh, Adv. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Transport Department. AND W.P.(C) 6854/2014 & CM No.16179/2014 (for stay) JAMSHED ANSARI Through: ..... Petitioner Versus THE STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Transport Department. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [ RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as Public Interest Litigations, impugn the Notification dated 28th August, 2014 of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Transport Department) amending Rule 115(2) of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rul...
Tag this Judgment!Jamshed Ansari Vs. the State, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2014. + W.P.(C) 6825/2014 AMIT BHAGAT + ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupender Pratap Singh, Adv. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Transport Department. AND W.P.(C) 6854/2014 & CM No.16179/2014 (for stay) JAMSHED ANSARI Through: ..... Petitioner Versus THE STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for Transport Department. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [ RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as Public Interest Litigations, impugn the Notification dated 28th August, 2014 of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Transport Department) amending Rule 115(2) of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rul...
Tag this Judgment!Punjab National Bank Vs. Sh. Gian Prakash and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1051/2014 26th November, 2014 % PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Narula with Mr.Ajay Kalra, Advocates. VERSUS SH. GIAN PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr.Dheeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate for R- 1 to 3 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.1050/2014 Since appearance has been put in on behalf of the respondents/caveators, caveat stands discharged. CM(M) 1051/2014 & C.M.Nos.19494/2014 (Stay),19495/2014 (Exemption) 1. Some officers of public sector banks in this country such as of the petitioner/Punjab National Bank (in short the Bank) in this case, it is seen that they can go to any extent in causing a perverse reading of the applicable circulars and guidelines issued by the Bank itself. Why this is done is not understood by this Court, but, the same surely besides causing a grave harassment to the customers...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Sonu Kumar Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :26. h November, 2014 % + CRL.L.P. 76/2014 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Ms.Shinjan Jain, Adv. and SI Alok Kumar Rajan, PS Sarai Rohilla. versus SONU KUMAR YADAV Through : ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The State is seeking leave to appeal impugning the judgment dated 26.10.2013 passed by learned Addl. Session Judge in Session Case No.151/2013 whereby the Respondent Sonu Kumar Yadav was acquitted of the charges under Section 354-A/363 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act.2. The grievance of the State is that from the statement of the child victim (PW-4) as well as the Complainant (PW-1), the Prosecution has been able to prove its case against the Respondent/Accused beyond reasonable doubt. However, learned Trial Court has failed to appreciate their testimony in correct perspective and acquitted the Respondent on non-existent ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »